From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Should we remove unused code?
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 11:18:53 -0400
Message-ID: <25311.1460992733@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160418180711.55ac82c0@fujitsu>
References: <20160418180711.55ac82c0@fujitsu>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru> writes:
> For instance there are two flags - HASH_SEGMENT and HASH_FFACTOR that
> are in fact never used (see attachment). I wonder whether we should
> keep code like this or not.
> What do you think?
The fact that make check-world doesn't run any code that uses some
feature isn't a great argument for removing it. Consider third-party
extensions, for starters.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru
Subject: Re: Should we remove unused code?
In-Reply-To: <25311.1460992733@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox