pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:13:17 -0500
Message-ID: <2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYbN=mkUcm_BY2VBqpJTqz4e81C3NXWjqayg6i_xnrRWg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+Tgmoap6WXzta=zw97SF73hCfzEWVMtfDFB01svYXMtTzKVVA@mail.gmail.com>
<20220117192510.txue5mihjaxlngep@alap3.anarazel.de>
<85428.1642447853@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20220117201619.3ltudwhgk2krmoki@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20220118210847.GC23027@telsasoft.com>
<20220203035827.GG23027@telsasoft.com>
<20220203195718.smqo5xg4ygp5qktq@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20220204050403.GL23027@telsasoft.com>
<20220213012008.4wpqzyszxu3z22d2@alap3.anarazel.de>
<20220213051937.GO31460@telsasoft.com>
<20220213083006.f2wulffsxr5zfwc4@alap3.anarazel.de>
<CA+TgmoYbN=mkUcm_BY2VBqpJTqz4e81C3NXWjqayg6i_xnrRWg@mail.gmail.com>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> This is exactly why I'm not a huge fan of having ci stuff in the tree.
> It supposes that there's one right way to do a build, but in reality,
> different people want and indeed need to use different options for all
> kinds of reasons. That's the whole value of having things like
> configure and pg_config_manual.h. When we start arguing about whether
> or ci builds should use -DWRITE_READ_PARSE_PLAN_TREES we're inevitably
> into the realm where no choice is objectively better,
Right. Can we set things up so that it's not too painful to inject
custom build options into a CI build? I should think that at the
very least one needs to be able to vary the configure switches and
CPPFLAGS/CFLAGS.
regards, tom lane
view thread (142+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de, pryzby@telsasoft.com, alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org, andrew@dunslane.net, thomas.munro@gmail.com, melanieplageman@gmail.com, peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, daniel@yesql.se
Subject: Re: Adding CI to our tree
In-Reply-To: <2597660.1644772397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox