public inbox for [email protected]help / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v4 5/7] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). 3+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v4 5/7] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). @ 2023-08-09 07:56 Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Tatsuo Ishii @ 2023-08-09 07:56 UTC (permalink / raw) --- doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- 3 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml index 755c9f1485..eda3612822 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/advanced.sgml @@ -537,6 +537,58 @@ WHERE pos < 3; <literal>rank</literal> less than 3. </para> + <para> + Row pattern common syntax can be used with row pattern common syntax to + perform row pattern recognition in a query. Row pattern common syntax + includes two sub clauses. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines definition + variables along with an expression. The expression must be a logical + expression, which means it must + return <literal>TRUE</literal>, <literal>FALSE</literal> + or <literal>NULL</literal>. Moreover if the expression comprises a column + reference, it must be the argument of <function>rpr</function>. An example + of <literal>DEFINE</literal> is as follows. + +<programlisting> +DEFINE + LOWPRICE AS price <= 100, + UP AS price > PREV(price), + DOWN AS price < PREV(price) +</programlisting> + + Note that <function>PREV</function> returns price column in the previous + row if it's called in a context of row pattern recognition. So in the + second line means the definition variable "UP" is <literal>TRUE</literal> + when price column in the current row is greater than the price column in + the previous row. Likewise, "DOWN" is <literal>TRUE</literal> when when + price column in the current row is lower than the price column in the + previous row. + </para> + <para> + Once <literal>DEFINE</literal> exists, <literal>PATTERN</literal> can be + used. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows that satisfies + certain conditions. For example following <literal>PATTERN</literal> + defines that a row starts with the condition "LOWPRICE", then one or more + rows satisfy "UP" and finally one or more rows satisfy "DOWN". If a + sequence of rows found, rpr returns the column at the starting row. + Example of a <literal>SELECT</literal> using the <literal>DEFINE</literal> + and <literal>PATTERN</literal> clause is as follows. + +<programlisting> +SELECT company, tdate, price, max(price) OVER w FROM stock + WINDOW w AS ( + PARTITION BY company + ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING + AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW + INITIAL + PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+) + DEFINE + LOWPRICE AS price <= 100, + UP AS price > PREV(price), + DOWN AS price < PREV(price) +); +</programlisting> + </para> + <para> When a query involves multiple window functions, it is possible to write out each one with a separate <literal>OVER</literal> clause, but this is diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index be2f54c914..6cda164522 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -21715,6 +21715,7 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable; returns <literal>NULL</literal> if there is no such row. </para></entry> </row> + </tbody> </tgroup> </table> @@ -21754,6 +21755,59 @@ SELECT count(*) FROM sometable; Other frame specifications can be used to obtain other effects. </para> + <para> + Row pattern recognition navigation functions are listed in + <xref linkend="functions-rpr-navigation-table"/>. These functions + can be used to describe DEFINE clause of Row pattern recognition. + </para> + + <table id="functions-rpr-navigation-table"> + <title>Row Pattern Navigation Functions</title> + <tgroup cols="1"> + <thead> + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + Function + </para> + <para> + Description + </para></entry> + </row> + </thead> + + <tbody> + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>prev</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>prev</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> ) + <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Returns the column value at the previous row; + returns NULL if there is no previous row in the window frame. + </para></entry> + </row> + + <row> + <entry role="func_table_entry"><para role="func_signature"> + <indexterm> + <primary>next</primary> + </indexterm> + <function>next</function> ( <parameter>value</parameter> <type>anyelement</type> ) + <returnvalue>anyelement</returnvalue> + </para> + <para> + Returns the column value at the next row; + returns NULL if there is no next row in the window frame. + </para></entry> + </row> + + </tbody> + </tgroup> + </table> + <note> <para> The SQL standard defines a <literal>RESPECT NULLS</literal> or diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml index 0ee0cc7e64..8d3becd57a 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/select.sgml @@ -966,8 +966,8 @@ WINDOW <replaceable class="parameter">window_name</replaceable> AS ( <replaceabl The <replaceable class="parameter">frame_clause</replaceable> can be one of <synopsis> -{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] -{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] +{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax] +{ RANGE | ROWS | GROUPS } BETWEEN <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> AND <replaceable>frame_end</replaceable> [ <replaceable>frame_exclusion</replaceable> ] [row_pattern_common_syntax] </synopsis> where <replaceable>frame_start</replaceable> @@ -1074,6 +1074,40 @@ EXCLUDE NO OTHERS a given peer group will be in the frame or excluded from it. </para> + <para> + The + optional <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable> + defines the <firstterm>row pattern recognition condition</firstterm> for + this + window. <replaceable class="parameter">row_pattern_common_syntax</replaceable> + includes following subclauses. <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST + ROW</literal> or <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> controls + how to proceed to next row position after a match + found. With <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW</literal> (the + default) next row position is next to the last row of previous match. On + the other hand, with <literal>AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW</literal> next + row position is always next to the last row of previous + match. <literal>DEFINE</literal> defines definition variables along with a + boolean expression. <literal>PATTERN</literal> defines a sequence of rows + that satisfies certain conditions using variables defined + in <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause. If the variable is not defined in + the <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause, it is implicitly assumed + following is defined in the <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause. + +<synopsis> +<literal>variable_name</literal> AS TRUE +</synopsis> + + Note that the maximu number of variables defined + in <literal>DEFINE</literal> clause is 26. + +<synopsis> +[ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW | AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW ] +PATTERN <replaceable class="parameter">pattern_variable_name</replaceable>[+] [, ...] +DEFINE <replaceable class="parameter">definition_varible_name</replaceable> AS <replaceable class="parameter">expression</replaceable> [, ...] +</synopsis> + </para> + <para> The purpose of a <literal>WINDOW</literal> clause is to specify the behavior of <firstterm>window functions</firstterm> appearing in the query's -- 2.25.1 ----Next_Part(Wed_Aug__9_17_41_12_2023_134)-- Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="v4-0006-Row-pattern-recognition-patch-tests.patch" ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq @ 2023-11-01 01:11 Tom Lane <[email protected]> 2023-11-01 01:55 ` Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Tom Lane @ 2023-11-01 01:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>; +Cc: Yugo NAGATA <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-hackers Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > Okay, I added "_successful_ calls", attached. I am not sure what else > to add. What I'm objecting to is removal of the bit about "if they need to be called again". That provides a hint that retry is the appropriate response to a failure. Admittedly, it's not 100% clear, but your version makes it 0% clear. regards, tom lane ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq 2023-11-01 01:11 Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq Tom Lane <[email protected]> @ 2023-11-01 01:55 ` Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Bruce Momjian @ 2023-11-01 01:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Tom Lane <[email protected]>; +Cc: Yugo NAGATA <[email protected]>; Alvaro Herrera <[email protected]>; pgsql-hackers On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 09:11:06PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> writes: > > Okay, I added "_successful_ calls", attached. I am not sure what else > > to add. > > What I'm objecting to is removal of the bit about "if they need to be > called again". That provides a hint that retry is the appropriate > response to a failure. Admittedly, it's not 100% clear, but your > version makes it 0% clear. I thought the original docs said you had to re-call on failure (it would not block but it would fail if it could not be sent), while we are now saying that it will be queued in the input buffer. Is retry really something we need to mention now? If out of memory is our only failure case now ("unable to enlarge the buffer because OOM"), is retry really a realistic option? Am I missing something? -- Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> https://momjian.us EDB https://enterprisedb.com Only you can decide what is important to you. ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-11-01 01:55 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-08-09 07:56 [PATCH v4 5/7] Row pattern recognition patch (docs). Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]> 2023-11-01 01:11 Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq Tom Lane <[email protected]> 2023-11-01 01:55 ` Re: Question about non-blocking mode in libpq Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox