pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Cc: pgsql-core <pgsql-core@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2015 10:23:56 -0400
Message-ID: <26673.1433514236@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoYP=7XNn-9O+2Z8fuRahVxGVuHkkp3ZUxCsHeCD7GTpHA@mail.gmail.com >
References: <CA+Tgmoadg9dHLpWodfwDaTZ=RbW+C_4CrgYyZ=Vx5QpMyP=N5A@mail.gmail.com >
<28477.1432931820@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+Tgmoa6hekDGenr29TG_K4bH7rxLEM9RU+5KDAiY+SiAsFhew@mail.gmail.com >
<20150529223321.GB6535@alap3.anarazel.de >
<CA+TgmoYSO0a9YDe2bhpZoPgO4m62CyQL26LRkCQ8=vrQ8ZwdXA@mail.gmail.com >
<12510.1432958887@sss.pgh.pa.us >
<CA+TgmoYovkev0xXnxaTD8vnt=M9Cn+RmOkVEouqwj6_9JLkzLw@mail.gmail.com >
<20150530154559.GA25053@momjian.us >
<20150530204727.GJ13944@alap3.anarazel.de >
<20150531024845.GB13697@momjian.us >
<20150603135049.GA74753@tornado.leadboat.com >
<WM!4ae914f9770e3cb63aa899dbc2db60d7ff4a3ad580e90f3dc1cd72315fff26fd1935dbe8884fd2e9f5370d881036c3bd!@asav-3.01.com >
<556F3798.6010707@agliodbs.com >
<CANP8+jJPyQLadtqrPJKrBVOEvK85nz+2oMk=CDAcUrwS-O-eNA@mail.gmail.com >
<CA+TgmoYP=7XNn-9O+2Z8fuRahVxGVuHkkp3ZUxCsHeCD7GTpHA@mail.gmail.com >
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:50 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Agreed. Cleanup can occur while we release code for public testing.
> The code is available for public testing right now.
Only to people who have the time and ability to pull the code from git
and build from source. I don't know exactly what fraction of interested
testers that excludes, but I bet it's significant. The point of producing
packages would be to remove that barrier to testing.
> Stamping it a
> beta implies that we think it's something fairly stable that we'd be
> pretty happy to release if things go well, which is a higher bar to
> clear.
So let's call it an alpha, or some other way of setting expectations
appropriately. But I think it's silly to maintain that the code is not in
a state where end-user testing is useful. They just have to understand
that they can't trust it with production data.
> I can't help noticing for all the drumbeat of "let's release 9.5 beta
> now", activity to clean up the items on this list seems quite
> sluggish:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.5_Open_Items
While we need to work on those items, I do not agree that getting that
list to empty has to happen before we release a test version. I think
serializing effort in that way is simply bad project management. And
it's not how we've operated in the past either: getting the open items
list to empty has always been understood as a prerequisite to RC versions,
not to betas.
To get to specifics instead of generalities: exactly which of the current
open items do you think is so bad that it precludes user testing? I do
not see a beta-blocker in the lot.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
view thread (79+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <26673.1433514236@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink: ../26673.1433514236@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/26673.1433514236@sss.pgh.pa.us
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, simon@2ndquadrant.com, josh@agliodbs.com, noah@leadboat.com, bruce@momjian.us, andres@anarazel.de, sfrost@snowman.net, magnus@hagander.net, pgsql-core@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [CORE] Restore-reliability mode
In-Reply-To: <26673.1433514236@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox