From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2019 20:25:37 -0500
Message-ID: <27981.1549761937@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190210011654.GA30811@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20190210011654.GA30811@alvherre.pgsql>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Feb-09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh ... then why don't we go ahead and get rid of the constraint entry,
>> too?
> Because each partition has its own pg_constraint entry. (Otherwise
> there's no place to put the column numbers into -- they can differ from
> partition to partition, remember.) The only thing we do is mark it as
> child of the parent's one.
Uh-huh. And what happens after DETACH PARTITION ... are you going to run
around and recreate these triggers?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, amitlangote09@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
In-Reply-To: <27981.1549761937@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox