pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Jakob Egger <jakob@eggerapps.at>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2018 11:09:54 -0400
Message-ID: <31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1CE1384A-7344-4405-A8C3-AF4C111DEF4D@yesql.se>
References: <20840.1537850987@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<DF261D4E-DFB6-4474-9B35-7BBEC93AD959@eggerapps.at>
	<29535.1539698523@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<486.1539702831@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<5BE313A1-1318-4A68-A183-5F60CA968CF1@eggerapps.at>
	<30776.1539786526@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<687EAD19-E8F0-464C-9F2B-BE536B81985E@eggerapps.at>
	<2429.1539842651@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<25039.1539874646@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<11941.1541042255@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<529860F6-243F-4B6F-B6D6-4376291D1593@yesql.se>
	<6712.1541081675@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<F53307F8-1D9A-4E1D-865D-A27B99EC1BBF@yesql.se>
	<8198.1541083983@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<371F44FD-BCD0-4DD2-A261-346809E3CEE7@yesql.se>
	<4844.1541107036@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<a623ee37-eae8-298c-f43f-f81a182d1548@2ndquadrant.com>
	<8164.1541110113@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<8453.1541110417@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<18304.1541169741@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<1CE1384A-7344-4405-A8C3-AF4C111DEF4D@yesql.se>

Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se> writes:
>> On 2 Nov 2018, at 15:42, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Anybody have an opinion about which approach to use?  We need to choose
>> one, and PDQ too, if we want full buildfarm coverage on it before Monday's
>> wrap.

> #1 is the option that appeals to me the most, mostly because it removes all
> possible ambiguity of when/if it’s required compared to #2.

I'm sort of leaning in that direction too, after sleeping on it.
It's also closer to what we already shipped in 11.0 than #2 is.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (30+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, daniel@yesql.se, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, jakob@eggerapps.at, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
  Subject: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
  In-Reply-To: <31039.1541171394@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox