From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2021 10:40:43 -0400
Message-ID: <3784121.1628606443@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290c0d8-f619-0fa2-7c2f-8077ad967bbc@dunslane.net>
References: <aede93a4-7d92-ef26-398f-5094944c2504@dunslane.net>
<3796296.1621545509@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<1290c0d8-f619-0fa2-7c2f-8077ad967bbc@dunslane.net>
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> I will undertake to do the work, once we get the bike-shedding part done.
> I'll kick that off by suggesting we move all of these to the namespace
> PgTest, and rename TestLib to Utils, so instead of
> use TestLib;
> use PostgresNode;
> you would say
> use PgTest::Utils;
> use PgTest::PostgresNode;
Using both "Pg" and "Postgres" seems a bit inconsistent.
Maybe "PgTest::PgNode"?
More generally, I've never thought that "Node" was a great name
here; it's a very vague term. While we're renaming, maybe we
could change it to "PgTest::PgCluster" or the like?
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, andrew@dunslane.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Postgres perl module namespace
In-Reply-To: <3784121.1628606443@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox