From: Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>
To: Marten Feldtmann <marten@feki.toppoint.de>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chris@bitmead.com>
Cc: Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au>
Cc: PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 22:18:26 +0300
Message-ID: <39298802.7BF18AB3@tm.ee> (raw)
References: <200005221656.SAA02300@feki.toppoint.de>
Marten Feldtmann wrote:
>
> > Hannu Krosing wrote:
> >
> > It's not such a big deal really. When you do an OO model you don't need
> > to think about your own primary key.
> >
I don't remember saying that, must have been someone else.
But it is true, you don't need anything but OID if you don't want to
distinguish your objects yourself but only need them to be distinct
for your program, i.e. yo have two cheques absolutely similar, except
that
there are two of them ;)
----------
Hannu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: hannu@tm.ee, marten@feki.toppoint.de, chris@bitmead.com, chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au
Subject: Re: Thus spoke SQL3 (on OO)
In-Reply-To: <39298802.7BF18AB3@tm.ee>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox