From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: James Coleman <jtc331@gmail.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Shaun Thomas <shaun.thomas@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:22:19 -0400
Message-ID: <4314.1584130939@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200313194250.GA13008@alvherre.pgsql>
References: <20200313194250.GA13008@alvherre.pgsql>
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Also, I wonder if it would be better to modify our policies so that we
> update typedefs.list more frequently. Some people include additions
> with their commits, but it's far from SOP.
Perhaps. My own workflow includes pulling down a fresh typedefs.list
from the buildfarm (which is trivial to automate) and then adding any
typedefs invented by the patch I'm working on. The latter part of it
makes it hard to see how the in-tree list would be very helpful; and
if we started expecting patches to include typedef updates, I'm afraid
we'd get lots of patch collisions in that file.
I don't have any big objection to updating the in-tree list more often,
but personally I wouldn't use it, unless we can find a better workflow.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, jtc331@gmail.com, tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, rafia.pghackers@gmail.com, pg@bowt.ie, simon@2ndquadrant.com, shaun.thomas@2ndquadrant.com, 9erthalion6@gmail.com, a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
In-Reply-To: <4314.1584130939@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox