pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel@yesql.se>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2018 22:09:41 -0400
Message-ID: <4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5AADB130.2020206@anastigmatix.net>
References: <579297F8.7020107@anastigmatix.net>
	<CA+TgmoaJR3s6CymT2wa9L5QR0pKY0cBthfece8MtxaBADMXw0Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<5797D953.6040806@anastigmatix.net>
	<20160802183347.GD32575@momjian.us>
	<CA+TgmobKFW5eVx4gd9TyiXv9iL_5DcC0-6UuJLXvwG1Ft1Pn-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<20943eba-bbb9-390c-01b1-e6704ce33c7b@iki.fi>
	<594C9457.6000708@anastigmatix.net>
	<59506148.1010708@anastigmatix.net>
	<2b9ed9a4-56a6-a4db-0abf-3527d993e2d4@iki.fi>
	<fe79f7c5-2bc5-f763-8908-78675ba33eba@anastigmatix.net>
	<d190140f-b6e8-5e2f-c663-c8f9617da18e@iki.fi>
	<CAB7nPqQr1D3gjx8CmHYQREidG2eeGHzx2yQ97B3t2L99GE=+kQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<5A92F0C0.7070706@anastigmatix.net>
	<C0523BD1-485D-48B5-982E-8D63E2D001B7@yesql.se>
	<5AADB130.2020206@anastigmatix.net>

Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> Thanks for the review. I notice that cfbot has now flagged the patch as
> failing, and when I look into it, it appears that cfbot is building with
> your test patch, and without the xlog.c patch, and so the test naturally
> fails. Does the cfbot require both patches to be attached to the same
> email, in order to include them both?

I believe so --- AFAIK it does not know anything about dependencies
between different patches, and will just try to build whatever patch(es)
appear in the latest email on a given thread.  Munro might be able to
provide more detail.

			regards, tom lane




view thread (49+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, chap@anastigmatix.net, daniel@yesql.se, michael.paquier@gmail.com, hlinnaka@iki.fi, robertmhaas@gmail.com, bruce@momjian.us
  Subject: Re: [HACKERS] AdvanceXLInsertBuffer vs. WAL segment compressibility
  In-Reply-To: <4597.1521338981@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox