From: Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Marshall, Steve <smarshall@wsi.com>
Cc: pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 19:24:27 +0200
Message-ID: <46EC154B.2050401@kaltenbrunner.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28630.1189875785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <200709141720.l8EHKwX13792@momjian.us>
<87bqc5m90n.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
<12919.1189792669@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<46EADA0A.3040504@kaltenbrunner.cc>
<12435.1189821208@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<46EC07E7.9000100@kaltenbrunner.cc>
<28630.1189875785@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes:
>> yeah testing that patch now (seems to apply just fine on -HEAD) but it
>> seems that there is something strange going on because I just got:
>
> ! ERROR: could not read block 2 of relation 1663/16384/2606: read only 0 of 8192 bytes
>
> Is that repeatable? What sort of filesystem are you testing on?
that box is slow - still testing ...
> (soft-mounted NFS by any chance?)
no - local SATA disk with ext3 (no OS related errors and SMART is clean too)
Stefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, stark@enterprisedb.com, bruce@momjian.us, smarshall@wsi.com, pgsql-patches@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: PL/TCL Patch to prevent postgres from becoming multithreaded
In-Reply-To: <46EC154B.2050401@kaltenbrunner.cc>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox