From: Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <pgadmin@pse-consulting.de>
Cc: Decibel! <decibel@decibel.org>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2008 08:36:47 -0700
Message-ID: <4849598F.9080800@commandprompt.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1669.1212765410@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <48409D1E.3070208@agliodbs.com>
<Pine.GSO.4.64.0806041045520.2258@westnet.com>
<29525.1212613052@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<200806061435.01196.peter_e@gmx.net>
<1669.1212765410@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> - If we know better values, why don't we set them by default?
>
> The problem is: better for what? In particular, I'm uncomfortable with
> any changes in the direction of trying to make Postgres take over the
> entire machine by default. I'd want some fairly explicit permission
> from the user for that ...
That is where some 80% solution sample config files come in.
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: jd@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, peter_e@gmx.net, gsmith@gregsmith.com, pgadmin@pse-consulting.de, decibel@decibel.org, josh@agliodbs.com
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
In-Reply-To: <4849598F.9080800@commandprompt.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox