pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Cc: Michael Nacos <m.nacos@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:09:41 +0200
Message-ID: <48AA7FC5.6070800@hagander.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080818215010.GC4454@alvh.no-ip.org>
References: <7473.1212625397@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<200807161530.m6GFUNY28751@momjian.us>
	<407fa4640808130738s3537ca45j22322a5eb70f9173@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0808171610220.22642@westnet.com>
	<407fa4640808180426q26a41cv817deb91dbbcd312@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.GSO.4.64.0808181250190.17947@westnet.com>
	<87y72u178j.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
	<3447.1219088424@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<20080818215010.GC4454@alvh.no-ip.org>

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Tom Lane escribió:
>> Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
>>> The entire target market for such a thing is DBAs stuck on hosted databases
>>> which don't have shell access to their machines. Perhaps the overlap between
>>> that and the people who can write a server-side module which dumps out a
>>> config file according to some rules is just too small?
>> There's a veritable boatload of stuff we do that assumes shell access
>> (how many times have you seen cron jobs recommended, for instance?).
>> So I'm unconvinced that "modify the config without shell access"
>> is really a goal that is worth lots of effort.
> 
> Actually, lots of people are discouraged by suggestions of using cron to
> do anything.  The only reason cron is suggested is because we don't have
> any other answer, and for many people it's a half-solution.  An
> integrated task scheduler in Pg would be more than welcome.

Yes, I hear a lot of people complaining aobut that too. Now that we have
a working autovacuum, some of it goes away though - no need to cron your
VACUUMs in most cases anymore. But there are still backups - but they
are often managed by the scheduler of an enterprise backup software.


> Also, remember that pgAdmin already comes with a pgAgent thing.

Yeah, it's a real life-saver on Windows where the builtin task-scheduler
isn't as readily accessible or easy to use..

//Magnus



view thread (226+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <48AA7FC5.6070800@hagander.net>
Permalink:  ../48AA7FC5.6070800@hagander.net/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/48AA7FC5.6070800@hagander.net

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: magnus@hagander.net, alvherre@commandprompt.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, stark@enterprisedb.com, gsmith@gregsmith.com, m.nacos@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: Overhauling GUCS
  In-Reply-To: <48AA7FC5.6070800@hagander.net>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox