From: Petr Jelinek <pjmodos@pjmodos.net>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:40:03 +0200
Message-ID: <4A390043.4080405@pjmodos.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090617140904.GL20436@tamriel.snowman.net>
References: <4A37BF63.50008@pjmodos.net>
<4A37E122.8070303@pjmodos.net>
<4A38A956.8080600@pjmodos.net>
<200906171644.53717.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20090617140904.GL20436@tamriel.snowman.net>
Stephen Frost wrote:
> I don't like the idea that a 'GRANT ALL' would actually change default
> ACLs for a schema though. These are two separate and distinct things-
> one is implementing a change to existing objects, the other is setting a
> default for new objects. Mixing them would lead to confusion.
>
It doesn't. I stated that I am not implementing the second part of the
TODO item in my first email specifically for this reason (the second
part was GRANT ON NEW TABLES).
--
Regards
Petr Jelinek (PJMODOS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: pjmodos@pjmodos.net, sfrost@snowman.net, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: GRANT ON ALL IN schema
In-Reply-To: <4A390043.4080405@pjmodos.net>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox