pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>
Cc: Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 10:21:26 +0300
Message-ID: <4E896276.7020209@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGQGwHDmzMs-GjYw-k=Ob+YSeK9c9KpDcBzbm1BDNNp5xcb1g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGQGwEEn13awaWZA-fMb76fNXASLLpqmUY8N-sK55ApZy-ErA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+U5nML8aK6iMpnaXf=vGYLCRkdqKUFJ6nTLTjEVpLj6oYYTRA@mail.gmail.com>
	<889.1317069556@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<F4BDC274-D382-4BC2-A093-282E29523DD8@phlo.org>
	<4E816650.80607@enterprisedb.com>
	<DC50F45C-95E9-4F9A-B835-B6BDEEFA4EEC@phlo.org>
	<CAHGQGwHDmzMs-GjYw-k=Ob+YSeK9c9KpDcBzbm1BDNNp5xcb1g@mail.gmail.com>

On 29.09.2011 14:31, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Florian Pflug<fgp@phlo.org>  wrote:
>> Actually, why don't we use that machinery to implement this? There's currently no rm_safe_restartpoint callback for RM_XLOG_ID, so we'd just need to create one that checks whether invalid_page_tab is empty.
>
> Okay, the attached patch prevents the creation of restartpoints by using
> rm_safe_restartpoint callback if we've not reached a consistent state yet
> and the invalid-page table is not empty. But the invalid-page table is not
> tied to the specific resource manager, so using rm_safe_restartpoint for
> that seems to slightly odd. Is this OK?

I don't think this should use the rm_safe_restartpoint machinery. As you 
said, it's not tied to any specific resource manager. And I've actually 
been thinking that we will get rid of rm_safe_restartpoint altogether in 
the future. The two things that still use it are the b-tree and gin, and 
I'd like to change both of those to not require any post-recovery 
cleanup step to finish multi-page operations, similar to what I did with 
GiST in 9.1.

-- 
   Heikki Linnakangas
   EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com



view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <4E896276.7020209@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink:  ../4E896276.7020209@enterprisedb.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/4E896276.7020209@enterprisedb.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com, masao.fujii@gmail.com, fgp@phlo.org, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, simon@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
  In-Reply-To: <4E896276.7020209@enterprisedb.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox