From: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
To: Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:45:52 +0900
Message-ID: <55D5A1D0.2070709@lab.ntt.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABOikdMMgkAG_iX1B_Yq4s-L8wd5PN4f1ptmPe0+z3E58bsArA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <55D3093C.5010800@lab.ntt.co.jp>
<CABOikdMMgkAG_iX1B_Yq4s-L8wd5PN4f1ptmPe0+z3E58bsArA@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>
On 2015-08-20 PM 06:27, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp
>> wrote:
>>
>> PARTITION BY LIST ON (name)
>> PARTITION BY RANGE ON (year, month)
>>
>> PARTITION BY LIST ON ((lower(left(name, 2)))
>> PARTITION BY RANGE ON ((extract(year from d)), (extract(month from d)))
>>
>>
>
> How about HASH partitioning? Are there plans to support foreign tables as
> partitions?
>
I've not given HASH partitioning a lot of thought yet. About the latter,
it seems it should not be too difficult to incorporate into the proposed
partitioning internals.
Thanks,
Amit
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp, pavan.deolasee@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning
In-Reply-To: <55D5A1D0.2070709@lab.ntt.co.jp>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox