pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:57:00 -0400
Message-ID: <7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+TgmoZ9W4-8jBMhmBXbmJ_90UwqQ=V7T3oXtG_zi-uYor3m0Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMkU=1y2G8VOVBHv3iXU2TMAj7-RyBFFW1uhkr5sm9LQ2=X35g@mail.gmail.com>
	<e18b9bf5-1557-cb9c-001e-0861a1d7dfce@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+TgmoZny9Bte4_rYi2S+vGh1TV69NreAHzD6v96tUxryyDn2w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFjFpRd+g1fw5EVR7e=BcJP8adY7WjDBq=SZgo6GH4qyaPRq1A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoaZDP0ysRqwmP=W4cQr57zN6deNcp0gj_xZw8Czwqf13Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFjFpRfSbaaWyJxaGs5Au1gy3puQ13mTGTGF7Az2FAhi+1QQEQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<0700eb97-d9db-33da-4ba2-e28d2a1631d9@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<47f35675-e504-033a-5bbe-185b78b47c3b@pgmasters.net>
	<23a0e23e-853f-5937-a5fd-84e6c869be92@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<79b98e30-4d38-7deb-f1fb-bc0bc589a958@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CAMkU=1xc0Ee8rBGf=5H8_+KysUDr6qHwZ_cHiJqo5t0FZWVs-w@mail.gmail.com>
	<6a546fa4-6e86-a5ef-8264-cb44d21ff8b6@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<CA+Tgmoam_AG1FUSwKRdYao+8L=sGezgHJKyobrK--4WQJQduvg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoYsaVVi0MYrfhCww1=uP4cZtZ+uNwLfimqZN10PxzN3HQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<97fd423c-b9b2-4e14-71b3-f48693bb5c04@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<c5833381-4b03-80a7-36e0-d8e9070bd84b@lab.ntt.co.jp>
	<! 22168.1504041271@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoZ9W4-8jBMhmBXbmJ_90UwqQ=V7T3oXtG_zi-uYor3m0Q@mail.gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> We'd definitely need to do things that way in 9.6.  I'm not quite sure
>> whether it's too late to adopt the clean solution in v10.

> It probably is now.  Are you still planning to do something about this patch?

It's still on my list, but I didn't get to it during the CF.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (128+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, robertmhaas@gmail.com, fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp, jeff.janes@gmail.com, david@pgmasters.net, ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com
  Subject: Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
  In-Reply-To: <7031.1507215420@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox