pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrei Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Gregory Stark (as CFM) <stark.cfm@gmail.com>
Cc: Michał Kłeczek <michal@kleczek.org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 14:00:00 +0300
Message-ID: <735b5cd4-568d-fbf7-ad8c-dcfb4c3af86e@gmail.com> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <CAPpHfdsHWbdPVzUdmoKv3dpo8RHJOa=LQR-ZAT+89uvktMs9XA@mail.gmail.com >
References: <64486b0b-0404-e39e-322d-0801154901f3@postgrespro.ru >
<bcf2f3c5-fbdc-f85b-af3e-ebec616160f6@postgrespro.ru >
<05469e80-454b-41d7-d04f-421f42bbd4a9@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfdt9G3EU+vXuqexhweEQoMF-acPUUFuB6hV2Kg0gCy7AjA@mail.gmail.com >
<ebe66358-428c-439f-85dd-da72c9b2b0c2@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfdt-0kVV7O==aJEbjY2iGYBu+XBzTHEbPv_6sVNeC7fffQ@mail.gmail.com >
<48c11b23-9c23-440e-9a3c-020e05196449@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfdsQkY0Gu7bQ9Ekdyzo_5Xxz74TYKbwmk1on1WAASpxXcQ@mail.gmail.com >
<8800ccf2-ae82-461c-92a1-d4c0a22f8cf2@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfdvJ3jBQaJQKrf69K++kXi+Tvzn6TXO-DKXj0KVJjvMebg@mail.gmail.com >
<1bd80083-a13e-4e9f-a7ce-73c3faab521c@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfdsz8E085YF2VoJe2+h4YAShsh7p--t3kQfQTntiCy63Xg@mail.gmail.com >
<922623af-872e-4cdc-9238-129b18bee42d@postgrespro.ru >
<CAPpHfduoAHTp6O7Q8PDe_w=30v0n_06pGe5M65iR4DYcfaYnRw@mail.gmail.com >
<0ed2cf02-e655-6ec7-a4fe-52fd8d572f65@gmail.com >
<CAPpHfdsHWbdPVzUdmoKv3dpo8RHJOa=LQR-ZAT+89uvktMs9XA@mail.gmail.com >
30.04.2024 13:20, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 9:00 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've discovered another failure, introduced by d3d55ce57.
>> Please try the following:
>> CREATE TABLE t (a int unique, b float);
>> SELECT * FROM t NATURAL JOIN LATERAL
>> (SELECT * FROM t t2 TABLESAMPLE SYSTEM (t.b)) t2;
> I think we should just forbid SJE in case when relations to be merged
> have cross-references with lateral vars. The draft patch for this is
> attached. I'd like to ask Alexander to test it, Richard and Andrei to
> review it. Thank you!
Beside LATERAL vars, it seems that SJR doesn't play well with TABLESAMPLE
in general. For instance:
CREATE TABLE t (a int unique);
INSERT INTO t SELECT * FROM generate_series (1,100);
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM (SELECT * FROM t TABLESAMPLE BERNOULLI(1)) t1
NATURAL JOIN (SELECT * FROM t TABLESAMPLE BERNOULLI(100)) t2;
returned 100, 100, 100 for me, though with enable_self_join_removal = off,
I got 4, 0, 1...
Best regards,
Alexander
view thread (247+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <735b5cd4-568d-fbf7-ad8c-dcfb4c3af86e@gmail.com>
Permalink: ../735b5cd4-568d-fbf7-ad8c-dcfb4c3af86e@gmail.com/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/735b5cd4-568d-fbf7-ad8c-dcfb4c3af86e@gmail.com
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: exclusion@gmail.com, aekorotkov@gmail.com, a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru, stark.cfm@gmail.com, michal@kleczek.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Removing unneeded self joins
In-Reply-To: <735b5cd4-568d-fbf7-ad8c-dcfb4c3af86e@gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox