pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
To: Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: SSL SNI
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:05:12 +0100
Message-ID: <7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM-w4HNShLYanJyYPS-93z8exgQ2161tmwJJfn=QupQw2onLbw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <7289d5eb-62a5-a732-c3b9-438cee2cb709@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAEze2Wgdy1ROjOBsFvYKmNiHc9nw3xBLqjpz9NcZBo+5NP14Kw@mail.gmail.com>
	<be696d28-36e8-739b-04a9-48f1c374d6a8@enterprisedb.com>
	<CAM-w4HNShLYanJyYPS-93z8exgQ2161tmwJJfn=QupQw2onLbw@mail.gmail.com>

On 26.02.21 03:40, Greg Stark wrote:
> This still doesn't seem like it is IPv6-ready.

Do you mean the IPv6 detection code is not correct?  What is the problem?

 > Is there any harm in> having SNI with an IPv6 address there if it 
gets through?

I doubt it.

view thread (24+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com>
Permalink:  ../7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com

copy link · copy postgr.es

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com, stark@mit.edu, boekewurm+postgres@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: SSL SNI
  In-Reply-To: <7cf218c9-0229-d005-57a1-c4c3e7f4f3a8@enterprisedb.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox