From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:48:03 -0400
Message-ID: <8616.1584020883@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312074941.GB1739@paquier.xyz>
References: <24078.1583958800@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<20200311205254.GA2648@alvherre.pgsql>
<20200312074941.GB1739@paquier.xyz>
Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> +1. A patch does not seem to be that complicated. Now isn't it too
> late for v13?
I think we've generally given new tests more slack than new features so
far as schedule goes. If the patch ends up being complicated/invasive,
I might vote to hold it for v14, but let's see it first.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, michael@paquier.xyz, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, rjuju123@gmail.com, andres@anarazel.de
Subject: Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.
In-Reply-To: <8616.1584020883@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox