pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 13:03:21 -0400
Message-ID: <8716.1464714201@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574DBEA4.9000205@agliodbs.com>
References: <20160426152217.GA548975@alvherre.pgsql>
	<CA+TgmoaDLa-pTjezHXb6S4HoNRM11TVGm_9GA9Ep+h4M_JWyLQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8309.1461684889@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+Tgmoa7uxyQ=gCgTUpzhc5V+biZspi9Cot8v0S96LiATgnoYQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<8684.1461685466@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<CA+TgmoYKkQigU+LeqVREnUvvd5eDx0ju8-i_QexbX_+BV0p0Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmobRmK649eDYvF6dgnQJNJVJvZffDz674wD+GWqCcb=YjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA4eK1K9jEnnEs_xxR0b5MH_8RTybe22DfkufL=ksX2o-ZqCMw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAKJS1f_kijB4EPpUrML2q=pourNnQB+WOdBuCCBSDc27BK_gvw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+TgmoYjMmSx93onaoOSrWcsNHmD2GOegfyrKoJs=1tbhUMHeg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20160529053300.GD496776@tornado.leadboat.com>
	<CA+TgmoYqLP6dPpcLvWU-ToJFNn4Dp3NE2qAmgXprKN3S6wTSFw@mail.gmail.com>
	<WM!782dde02eb02f131fac86b9aa0affdd2fa2450ae598af9554b103693ecd60442e44967d03f38f3b7cda9ff5b35da9166!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com>
	<574DBEA4.9000205@agliodbs.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

Josh berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> I realize there's a lot of water under the bridge here, but I think
> we're going to get 1000 questions on -general of the type:  "I asked for
> 8 parallel workers, why did I only get 7?".  I believe we will regret
> this change.
> So, one vote from me to revert.

Well, that gets back to the question of whether average users will
understand the "degree" terminology.  For the record, while I do not
like the current behavior either, this was not the solution I favored.
I thought we should rename the GUC and keep it as meaning the number
of additional worker processes.

			regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (185+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <8716.1464714201@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Permalink:  ../8716.1464714201@sss.pgh.pa.us/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/8716.1464714201@sss.pgh.pa.us

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, josh@agliodbs.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, noah@leadboat.com, david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com, amit.kapila16@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, magnus@hagander.net, bruce@momjian.us
  Subject: Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
  In-Reply-To: <8716.1464714201@sss.pgh.pa.us>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox