From: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Sergei Kornilov <sk@zsrv.org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:50:31 +0200
Message-ID: <94fd4ca1-0a5b-266d-0cc9-05b6396dffda@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190416061900.GI2673@paquier.xyz>
References: <20190411132704.GC30766@paquier.xyz>
<20190411134947.GA22043@alvherre.pgsql>
<20190412031046.GD2144@paquier.xyz>
<d8jbm1b32cv.fsf@dalvik.ping.uio.no>
<20190416061900.GI2673@paquier.xyz>
On 2019-04-16 08:19, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 12:11:12PM +0100, Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker wrote:
>> I don't have any comments on the code (but the test looks sensible, it's
>> the same trick I used to discover the issue in the first place).
>
> After thinking some more on it, this behavior looks rather sensible to
> me. Are there any objections?
Looks good to me.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, michael@paquier.xyz, ilmari@ilmari.org, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com, sk@zsrv.org, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: REINDEX CONCURRENTLY 2.0
In-Reply-To: <94fd4ca1-0a5b-266d-0cc9-05b6396dffda@2ndquadrant.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox