public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
To: Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: enable fallthrough warnings on clang
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 16:03:59 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGECzQTs7qXSs8ztAFHCN=KB8SA_zDxO8CZ5+zBwq7zVOXbKKg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
On Tue, 20 Jan 2026 at 12:16, Peter Eisentraut <[email protected]> wrote:
> So my proposal is that we wrap the appropriate attribute into a
> pg_fallthrough macro, and replace the current comments with that.
All looks okay to me. The only thing that stood out is that it checks
for C++ with __cpp_attributes instead of __cplusplus. Is it really
worth using this more specific attribute? Given that we're already
requiring C++11 and afaict all C++11 compilers should support the
general notion of attributes.
view thread (6+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: enable fallthrough warnings on clang
In-Reply-To: <CAGECzQTs7qXSs8ztAFHCN=KB8SA_zDxO8CZ5+zBwq7zVOXbKKg@mail.gmail.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox