pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: Postgres <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 05:08:13 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0901020335150.16680@westnet.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <603c8f070901011843p121e40afu35c4a7bdc51c051c@mail.gmail.com>
References: <FDDBA24E-FF4D-4654-BA75-692B3BA71B97@enterprisedb.com>
	<8347.1229012970@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<4136ffa0812110911x4914a951o6ca502879e3dede7@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k5a6tmy7.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com>
	<603c8f070901011230t1afa6644racb715b975078054@mail.gmail.com>
	<10658.1230843315@sss.pgh.pa.us>
	<603c8f070901011843p121e40afu35c4a7bdc51c051c@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 1 Jan 2009, Robert Haas wrote:

> The only thing I haven't been able to do is demonstrate that this change 
> actually produces a performance improvement.  Either I'm testing the 
> wrong thing, or it just doesn't provide any benefit on a single-spindle 
> system.

When I did a round of testing on the earlier prefetch test program Greg 
Stark put together, one of my single-spindle Linux system didn't show any 
real benefit.  So as long as you didn't see performance degrade, your not 
seeing any improvement isn't bad news.

I've got a stack of hardware I can do performance testing of this patch 
on, what I haven't been able to find time for is setting up any sort of 
test harness right now.  If you or Greg have any benchmark or test program 
you could suggest that should show off the improvements here, I'd be glad 
to run it on a bunch of systems and report back--I've already got a stack 
of candidate ones I ran the earlier tests on to compare results against.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD



view thread (41+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0901020335150.16680@westnet.com>
Permalink:  ../Pine.GSO.4.64.0901020335150.16680@westnet.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Pine.GSO.4.64.0901020335150.16680@westnet.com

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: gsmith@gregsmith.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, stark@enterprisedb.com, itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp
  Subject: Re: posix_fadvise v22
  In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0901020335150.16680@westnet.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox