public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: [email protected] <[email protected]>
To: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
Cc: Jelte Fennema-Nio <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <[email protected]>
Cc: Robert Haas <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: Stephen Frost <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <[email protected]>
Cc: Julien Rouhaud <[email protected]>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <[email protected]>
Cc: vignesh C <[email protected]>
Cc: Alexander Pyhalov <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2024 21:52:27 +0000
Message-ID: <TY2PR01MB3835F90801CE766B89B255EA95D92@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
References: <CAGECzQRVuUZEhPL+rzY0_0UKEaZ-sFFkLJ6GN+bad+im2r9=uQ@mail.gmail.com>
<TYAPR01MB308841016A3F1AE8247BAA6495C02@TYAPR01MB3088.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAGECzQSXXKVCQ13jHXtmk=PMsJHhFGb78PoT3JiT4eAcoLXxoA@mail.gmail.com>
<TY2PR01MB383585CACD74F2106A0563C195CB2@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAGECzQSKMO9C8-9Eo-feE3BJTF68EWKHXY4-xf_5BMKm8yAHPw@mail.gmail.com>
<TY2PR01MB38353E34056D0F91736F358395D42@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAGECzQTnfUdRO21CkwZeMowFZC3zQ9+dhNp3EB-G52=BXJvyPg@mail.gmail.com>
<TY2PR01MB3835DE59D4654A499A5A699795D52@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<CAGECzQT=CjkORFaZuBn4Db9CRt9C_EpB2isadmx_iNS3ZzQMwg@mail.gmail.com>
<TY2PR01MB3835CB1D110362A3213E5F6795D22@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
<[email protected]>
Hi Bruce.
> From: Bruce Momjian <[email protected]>
> Is there a reason the documentation is no longer a part of this patch?
> Can I help you keep it current?
Here are the reasons:
Reason1. The approach differs significantly from the previous patch that included documentation, the below.
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/152086/0001-Partial-aggregates-push-down-v34.patch
Reason2. I have two options for transmitting the state value and I'm evaluating which one is optimal.
One is what I presented you in PGConf.dev2024. The other is Jelte's one.
He listened to my talk at the conference and gave me some useful comments on hackers. I'm very grateful that.
Reason3. The implementation and test have been not finished yet.
Regarding Reason 2, I provided my conclusion in the previous message.
My plan for advancing the patch involves the following steps:
Step1. Decide the approach on transmitting state value.
Step2. Implement code (including comments) and tests to support a subset of aggregate functions.
Specifically, I plan to support avg, sum, and other aggregate functions like min and max which don't need export/import functions.
Step3. Add documentations.
To clarify my approach, should I proceed with Step 3 before Step2?
I would appreciate your feedback on this.
Best regards, Yuki Fujii
--
Yuki Fujii
Information Technology R&D Center, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation
view thread (45+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
In-Reply-To: <TY2PR01MB3835F90801CE766B89B255EA95D92@TY2PR01MB3835.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox