pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Fix early elog(FATAL)
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:16:39 -0600
Message-ID: <Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z10GM5BBojDI3u14@nathan>
References: <20241208034614.45.nmisch@google.com>
	<Z1i-K95hTcggVOgn@nathan>
	<20241212033414.e0.nmisch@google.com>
	<Z1sKJBE6-Lo08PEt@nathan>
	<20241214031505.05.nmisch@google.com>
	<Z10GM5BBojDI3u14@nathan>

On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:14:43PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 07:15:05PM -0800, Noah Misch wrote:
>> I don't feel strongly either way.  I did write it the option-1 way originally.
>> Then I started thinking about changes at a distance causing the other
>> InitProcessGlobals() tasks to palloc or elog.  We could do option-1 in master
>> and keep the back branches in their current state.
> 
> I don't feel strongly either way, either.  I don't think it's important
> enough to diverge from the back-branches.

Also, thank you for fixing this.

-- 
nathan





view thread (7+ messages)

Message-ID: <Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan>
Permalink:  ../Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan

 · 

reply

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, noah@leadboat.com
  Subject: Re: Fix early elog(FATAL)
  In-Reply-To: <Z10Gp-ryW44JGnYo@nathan>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox