public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Mark Wong <[email protected]>
To: Thomas Munro <[email protected]>
Cc: Ronan Dunklau <[email protected]>
Cc: Devrim Gündüz <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Cc: Fabien COELHO <[email protected]>
Cc: Andres Freund <[email protected]>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 15:00:40 -0700
Message-ID: <ZTL4iDQUNArRY1QA@moubin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+hUKGKReczOCzaL8J2aGv2YBOLDGJaLpF1wVmhtpFp6QmQagg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+hUKGKNX_=f+1C4r06WETKTq0G4Z_7q4L4Fxn5WWpMycDj9Fw@mail.gmail.com>
<5716086.DvuYhMxLoT@aivenlaptop>
<CA+hUKGLxVtLCo3xD1OEnMSQbq04MKx1G_vQ5SZQNMBSFPR_TpA@mail.gmail.com>
<2700884.mvXUDI8C0e@aivenlaptop>
<CA+hUKGKnLnJnWrkr=4mSGhE5FuTK55FY15uULR7=zzc=wX4Nqw@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGKtUB=-BQZd=u4BFZ-UJWi47fekwiYMSDXDZMyV+z1G-g@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKG+hopeRBGVwS4JE3uy1UO3TRnhF08HMiSpMrPODgtiw9Q@mail.gmail.com>
<CA+hUKGKReczOCzaL8J2aGv2YBOLDGJaLpF1wVmhtpFp6QmQagg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 10:48:47AM +1300, Thomas Munro wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:20 AM Thomas Munro <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Interestingly, a new problem just showed up on the the RHEL9 s390x
> > machine "lora", where a previously reported problem [1] apparently
> > re-appeared. It complains about incompatible layout, previously
> > blamed on mismatch between clang and LLVM versions. I can see that
> > its clang is v15 from clues in the conflig log, but I don't know which
> > version of LLVM is being used. However, I see now that --with-llvm
> > was literally just turned on, so there is no reason to think that this
> > would have worked before or this work is relevant. Strange though --
> > we must be able to JIT further than that on s390x because we have
> > crash reports in other threads (ie we made it past this and into other
> > more advanced brokenness).
>
> I see that Mark has also just enabled --with-llvm on some POWER Linux
> animals, and they have failed in various ways. The failures are
> strangely lacking in detail. It seems we didn't have coverage before,
> and I recall that there were definitely versions of LLVM that *didn't*
> work for our usage in the past, which I'll need to dredge out of the
> archives. I will try to get onto a cfarm POWER machine and see if I
> can reproduce that, before and after these commits, and whose bug is
> it etc.
Yeah, I'm slowing enabling --with-llvm on POWER, s390x, and aarch64 (but
none here yet as I write this)...
> I doubt I can get anywhere near an s390x though, and we definitely had
> pre-existing problems on that arch.
If you want to send me your ssh key, I have access to these systems
through OSUOSL and LinuxFoundation programs.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark Wong
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
view thread (21+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: LLVM 16 (opaque pointers)
In-Reply-To: <ZTL4iDQUNArRY1QA@moubin>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox