public inbox for [email protected]
help / color / mirror / Atom feedFrom: Nathan Bossart <[email protected]>
To: Hannu Krosing <[email protected]>
Cc: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2025 12:53:48 -0500
Message-ID: <aG6srPib60NzJBeg@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMT0RQStPtHfKwowd88Q0tynX0x=uJSKn=ihP8syhDJ6cH3DHQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[email protected]>
<CAMT0RQSALxZ2DJbq0b5cy+cvmpVxkawmv7c+qTWYObubZVr+2g@mail.gmail.com>
<[email protected]>
<Z_VTucTiS01p-d6z@nathan>
<[email protected]>
<aBkQLSkx1zUJ-LwJ@nathan>
<aBtzZ4PyccUVCcyA@nathan>
<CAMT0RQTXiqH7zdQEVSVd2L7_Cw4wQ1eHOD8hfZ+0vecMXJWc-w@mail.gmail.com>
<aG2ISJC__3lQwRqY@nathan>
<CAMT0RQStPtHfKwowd88Q0tynX0x=uJSKn=ihP8syhDJ6cH3DHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 04:52:16PM +0200, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> If you run it without the last WHERE it is reasonably fast. And it
> behaves the same as just inserting from the dump which also does not
> have any checks against duplicates.
With that change, the query is much faster, but my testing indicates that
it's still measurably slower than dumping and restoring the relevant
contents of pg_shdepend.
--
nathan
view thread (46+ messages) latest in thread
reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Subject: Re: Horribly slow pg_upgrade performance with many Large Objects
In-Reply-To: <aG6srPib60NzJBeg@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox