From: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 10:21:54 +0900
Message-ID: <aLeYMo_c2yWRxmSO@paquier.xyz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLUs7ap5paM8Vq9C@jrouhaud>
References: <aLUT2UO8RjJOzZNq@jrouhaud>
<aLUptKkboud-OZAw@paquier.xyz>
<aLUs7ap5paM8Vq9C@jrouhaud>
On Mon, Sep 01, 2025 at 01:19:41PM +0800, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> I don't really have a preference. Bank lock is shorter but may be a bit more
> obscure, especially outside slru.c, so using "SLRU bank lock" could be better
> indeed.
Okay, I have used "SLRU bank lock" and backpatched that down to v17
where it matters.
--
Michael
Attachments:
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 832B) download
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: michael@paquier.xyz, rjuju123@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: Update outdated references to SLRU ControlLock
In-Reply-To: <aLeYMo_c2yWRxmSO@paquier.xyz>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox