From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 17:09:00 -0500
Message-ID: <agOk_PheI2Rtb0kT@nathan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94060.1778621630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <509793.1764715875@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<afplW8DvRONDc1yl@nathan>
<729177.1778039019@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<aftTyjC_xWp-n30S@nathan>
<771696.1778079755@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<afta-6zVawsxlt1v@nathan>
<773076.1778080637@sss.pgh.pa.us>
<aftcOkcXCeFKmZbH@nathan>
<aftooa3UABE3AuZf@nathan>
<94060.1778621630@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 05:33:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com> writes:
>> Here's a new version of 0001 with a cleaned-up commit message. I've
>> omitted 0002, since it's just the result of running pgindent after apply
>> the first one.
>
> I think we're about ready to roll on doing the pgindent run.
> Do you want to push your patch tomorrow AM, and then I'll get
> on with the rest?
Sounds good. We won't be back-patching any of this, right?
--
nathan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: nathandbossart@gmail.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, li.evan.chao@gmail.com, rahilasyed90@gmail.com, robertmhaas@gmail.com, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: pgindent versus struct members and typedefs
In-Reply-To: <agOk_PheI2Rtb0kT@nathan>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox