pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Pedersen <jesper.pedersen@redhat.com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu.coek88@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:43:42 -0400
Message-ID: <bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb68fb02-5a85-e643-11cf-9319dd7edf2b@2ndquadrant.com>
References: <e2ac6c58-b93f-9dd9-f4e6-d6d30add7fdf@redhat.com>
	<CAE9k0Pk4dC9VrzV7Vm6em7JFzRMGfzx2=eYu0Yb_Psga-W47Ww@mail.gmail.com>
	<e1bda3f7-dc99-c610-4d48-58815f5b7515@redhat.com>
	<CAE9k0P=OQSEj0x9z91tvE9P1f-Ht7x7z8X+eDWQGTJNSFbn9yg@mail.gmail.com>
	<5d64a536-cc90-ce96-b68f-5b6bd3206476@redhat.com>
	<CAB7nPqTT3ZEm8QKsYYxfUnWL+P3p2mAbud7AFiZpK_JKx3eADA@mail.gmail.com>
	<d235dcd6-146a-1269-73a0-da9a55bfeddc@redhat.com>
	<80a00b5c-56d3-dffb-8dba-edf5d2167b12@2ndquadrant.com>
	<16d89e7e-cb1a-cb5d-e944-6f10c324a312@redhat.com>
	<c982b01c-06bc-485b-5dde-057ee244261a@2ndquadrant.com>
	<836487ee-8d4e-cd49-54ac-f4793ddba5ae@redhat.com>
	<8a751498-6ee9-b943-abf3-b5641851d7de@2ndquadrant.com>
	<62ee2eba-3a5b-06d3-e224-cfe00b395be7@redhat.com>
	<f52f2117-627b-baa3-1e83-59394e881bf5@2ndquadrant.com>
	<f8a19652-c5e4-4b8f-a461-62d886ff2400@2ndquadrant.com>
	<66afc31d-e97a-41c3-da4c-bfa02fa2d54e@redhat.com>
	<eb68fb02-5a85-e643-11cf-9319dd7edf2b@2ndquadrant.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@postgresql.org?body=unsub%20pgsql-hackers>

On 11/01/2016 03:28 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Ok, thanks for your feedback.
>>
>> Maybe "Returned with Feedback" is more appropriate, as there is still
>> development left.
>
> I have applied the documentation change that introduced subsections,
> which seems quite useful independently.  I have also committed the tests
> that I proposed and will work through the failures.
>
> As no new patch has been posted for the 2016-11 CF, I will close the
> patch entry now.  Please submit an updated patch when you have the time,
> keeping an eye on ongoing work to update hash indexes.
>

Agreed.

Best regards,
  Jesper



-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers



view thread (110+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com>
Permalink:  ../bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: jesper.pedersen@redhat.com, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, michael.paquier@gmail.com, ashu.coek88@gmail.com, jeff.janes@gmail.com, alvherre@2ndquadrant.com
  Subject: Re: pageinspect: Hash index support
  In-Reply-To: <bc1cd5c0-2619-7a49-7455-59db07e274c1@redhat.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox