pg.ddx.io pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive help / color / mirror / Atom feed From: Aleksandr Parfenov <a.parfenov@postgrespro.ru>
To: Dmitry Ivanov <d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: new function for tsquery creartion
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2018 17:49:08 +0300
Message-ID: <e011ca174d982f0d3ec604850ecdab75@postgrespro.ru> (raw )
In-Reply-To: <a269c5f0e426174dad29c474d3669e92@postgrespro.ru >
References: <fe931111ff7e9ad79196486ada79e268@postgrespro.ru >
<20180302030605.5ur6ktkb2vyb46pb@alap3.anarazel.de >
<152025433949.1548.16466871234054596674.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org >
<34280367-0dab-7f73-8d7c-d21c7276814b@pgmasters.net >
<8df9de83119eb295f3424c573d64ff84@postgrespro.ru >
<20180326092405.71820cf2@asp437-24-g082ur >
<a1686708fc7d43d9a2de19c1697ac57e@postgrespro.ru >
<CAEepm=3dQmh7NCC_ap-L4yMiVRcZuPXtJUv5_mOnYdoqsnUKvg@mail.gmail.com >
<6754a224654a4f0339195b83b133d551@postgrespro.ru >
<9153fb21831d0ba7c832960f37df2688@postgrespro.ru >
<20180328092115.GA32581@e733.localdomain >
<8829c490d0e17b6033b3fd622dfeed1e@postgrespro.ru >
<cbd6ea6e79b8247765a6c493943a5799@postgrespro.ru >
<b8355fbb948314e0dd4dd2594debc1bf@postgrespro.ru >
<1f33416d7173df5504e84e63680bd27e@postgrespro.ru >
<94e41ae5e36b640d3172729c4c9b5b4c@postgrespro.ru >
<20180403171320.400cd24a@asp437-24-g082ur >
<a269c5f0e426174dad29c474d3669e92@postgrespro.ru >
On 2018-04-04 17:33, Dmitry Ivanov wrote:
> I've been thinking about this for a while, and it seems that this
> should be fixed somewhere near parsetext(). Perhaps 'pg' and 'class'
> should share the same position. After all, somebody could implement a
> parser which would split some words using an arbitrary set of rules,
> for instance "split all words containing digits". I propose merging
> this patch provided that there are no objections.
I'm agree that this problem should be solved in separate patch and
that this feature can be merged without waiting for the fix.
--
Aleksandr Parfenov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
view thread (36+ messages) latest in thread
Message-ID: <e011ca174d982f0d3ec604850ecdab75@postgrespro.ru>
Permalink: ../e011ca174d982f0d3ec604850ecdab75@postgrespro.ru/
Also on: postgresql.org/message-id/e011ca174d982f0d3ec604850ecdab75@postgrespro.ru
copy link · copy postgr.es
reply Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: a.parfenov@postgrespro.ru, d.ivanov@postgrespro.ru, a.alekseev@postgrespro.ru, thomas.munro@enterprisedb.com, david@pgmasters.net, pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Subject: Re: new function for tsquery creartion
In-Reply-To: <e011ca174d982f0d3ec604850ecdab75@postgrespro.ru>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox