pg.ddx.io  pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org mailing list archive  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: Rafia Sabih <rafia.pghackers@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 17:04:23 +0200
Message-ID: <e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5183.1585925998@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <CA+HiwqH=Y85vRK3mOdjEkqFK+E=ST=eQiHdpj43L=_eJMOOznQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<d760bb60-563c-dd01-9903-f9337d50e8a6@2ndquadrant.com>
	<CA+HiwqFBni-cXy5NBN0PdwxidXgcCEio0N_AOnOM0pR2dMWUyA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+HiwqGVbp0yh-7-FscZiYu1B_CJjaDZRTYkPTjnjpUgSzE6RA@mail.gmail.com>
	<b8f257af-3fcd-65b9-088c-0248d82e4e99@2ndquadrant.com>
	<CA+HiwqFZbbJzAZgTjqbRarp_xeqyymuNmGg8Q5tDKTZbk3=c2A@mail.gmail.com>
	<c0d69728-c3d8-ede8-ad31-941b2bbaff66@2ndquadrant.com>
	<CA+HiwqE+6gNgr-BVYeCMT38naRi9cJaanJb7+FCNsX9XgMwHsQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+HiwqFjYE5anArxvkjr37AQMd52L-LZtz9Ld2QrLQ3YfcYhTw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+HiwqE+z2=wLv3a41h7JopcnUZAiFPeaiQyxZeGQ62QV3vsPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<4f999141-97c8-c968-a726-0a1ec3e36e47@2ndquadrant.com>
	<ff6007b3-02c2-8296-2896-db99a51f57e2@2ndquadrant.com>
	<CA+HiwqGWXeBA2xagkz_YdxycmO38Vah_aviyJf_kC_kjCdL-Xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+HiwqGkknVb+ccLVkgw1DoBYPzpuR43L+aT1eOT8dVEtiedtw@mail.gmail.com>
	<44ecae53-98! 61-71b7-1d43-4658acc52519@2ndquadrant.com>
	<5183.1585925998@sss.pgh.pa.us>

On 03/04/2020 16:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
>> AFAIK gcov can't handle multiple instances of same process being started
>> as it just overwrites the coverage files. So for TAP test it will report
>> bogus info (as in some code that's executed will look as not executed).
> 
> Hm, really?  I routinely run "make check" (ie, parallel regression
> tests) under coverage, and I get results that seem sane.  If I were
> losing large chunks of the data, I think I'd have noticed.
> 

Parallel regression still just starts single postgres instance no?

-- 
Petr Jelinek
2ndQuadrant - PostgreSQL Solutions for the Enterprise
https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/





view thread (86+ messages)  latest in thread

Message-ID: <e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com>
Permalink:  ../e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com/
Also on:    postgresql.org/message-id/e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com

 · 

reply
Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
  reply via email

  To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
  Cc: petr@2ndquadrant.com, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, amitlangote09@gmail.com, peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com, rafia.pghackers@gmail.com
  Subject: Re: adding partitioned tables to publications
  In-Reply-To: <e934a27d-bab4-b818-8936-bbcd2d41df0a@2ndquadrant.com>

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox