agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' 324+ messages / 2 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' @ 2026-04-07 13:11 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483 lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR. This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up. There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But this way we get the hangs out of the way. Reported-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz --- src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c | 2 -- src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c @@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len) SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex); - pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0); - /* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */ on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI)); diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo, walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr; walrcv->receivedTLI = tli; walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr; + pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr); } walrcv->receiveStart = recptr; walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli; -- 2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb --ags3ltqh73mz7p2n-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 3/3] add helper functions for fast-path arg setup @ 2026-06-02 18:24 Reviewer <review@example.com> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 324+ messages in thread From: Reviewer @ 2026-06-02 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw) --- src/interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c | 104 ++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c index 42b2a36bda9..8802c6f8098 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c +++ b/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-lobj.c @@ -44,6 +44,22 @@ static int lo_initialize(PGconn *conn); static Oid lo_import_internal(PGconn *conn, const char *filename, Oid oid); +static inline void +lo_set_int_arg(PQArgBlock *arg, int value) +{ + arg->isint = 1; + arg->len = 4; + arg->u.integer = value; +} + +static inline void +lo_set_ptr_arg(PQArgBlock *arg, const void *ptr, int len) +{ + arg->isint = 0; + arg->len = len; + arg->u.ptr = (int *) unconstify(void *, ptr); +} + /* * lo_open * opens an existing large object @@ -62,13 +78,9 @@ lo_open(PGconn *conn, Oid lobjId, int mode) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return -1; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = lobjId; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], lobjId); - argv[1].isint = 1; - argv[1].len = 4; - argv[1].u.integer = mode; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[1], mode); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_open, &fd, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 2); if (PQresultStatus(res) == PGRES_COMMAND_OK) @@ -101,9 +113,7 @@ lo_close(PGconn *conn, int fd) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return -1; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_close, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 1); if (PQresultStatus(res) == PGRES_COMMAND_OK) @@ -159,13 +169,9 @@ lo_truncate(PGconn *conn, int fd, size_t len) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); - argv[1].isint = 1; - argv[1].len = 4; - argv[1].u.integer = (int) len; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[1], (int) len); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_truncate, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 2); @@ -207,14 +213,10 @@ lo_truncate64(PGconn *conn, int fd, int64_t len) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); len = pg_hton64(len); - argv[1].isint = 0; - argv[1].len = 8; - argv[1].u.ptr = (int *) &len; + lo_set_ptr_arg(&argv[1], &len, 8); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_truncate64, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 2); @@ -261,13 +263,9 @@ lo_read(PGconn *conn, int fd, char *buf, size_t len) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); - argv[1].isint = 1; - argv[1].len = 4; - argv[1].u.integer = (int) len; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[1], (int) len); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_read, (void *) buf, len, &result_len, 0, argv, 2); @@ -312,13 +310,9 @@ lo_write(PGconn *conn, int fd, const char *buf, size_t len) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); - argv[1].isint = 0; - argv[1].len = (int) len; - argv[1].u.ptr = (int *) unconstify(char *, buf); + lo_set_ptr_arg(&argv[1], buf, (int) len); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_write, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 2); @@ -349,17 +343,11 @@ lo_lseek(PGconn *conn, int fd, int offset, int whence) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return -1; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); - argv[1].isint = 1; - argv[1].len = 4; - argv[1].u.integer = offset; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[1], offset); - argv[2].isint = 1; - argv[2].len = 4; - argv[2].u.integer = whence; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[2], whence); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_lseek, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 3); @@ -397,18 +385,12 @@ lo_lseek64(PGconn *conn, int fd, int64_t offset, int whence) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); offset = pg_hton64(offset); - argv[1].isint = 0; - argv[1].len = 8; - argv[1].u.ptr = (int *) &offset; + lo_set_ptr_arg(&argv[1], &offset, 8); - argv[2].isint = 1; - argv[2].len = 4; - argv[2].u.integer = whence; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[2], whence); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_lseek64, (void *) &retval, sizeof(retval), &result_len, 0, argv, 3); @@ -443,9 +425,7 @@ lo_creat(PGconn *conn, int mode) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return InvalidOid; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = mode; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], mode); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_creat, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 1); if (PQresultStatus(res) == PGRES_COMMAND_OK) @@ -487,9 +467,7 @@ lo_create(PGconn *conn, Oid lobjId) return InvalidOid; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = lobjId; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], lobjId); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_create, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 1); if (PQresultStatus(res) == PGRES_COMMAND_OK) @@ -520,9 +498,7 @@ lo_tell(PGconn *conn, int fd) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return -1; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_tell, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 1); @@ -560,9 +536,7 @@ lo_tell64(PGconn *conn, int fd) return -1; } - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = fd; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], fd); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_tell64, (void *) &retval, sizeof(retval), &result_len, 0, argv, 1); @@ -594,9 +568,7 @@ lo_unlink(PGconn *conn, Oid lobjId) if (lo_initialize(conn) < 0) return -1; - argv[0].isint = 1; - argv[0].len = 4; - argv[0].u.integer = lobjId; + lo_set_int_arg(&argv[0], lobjId); res = PQnfn(conn, conn->lobjfuncs->fn_lo_unlink, &retval, -1, &result_len, 1, argv, 1); -- 2.50.1 (Apple Git-155) --6CoALBM/+cswbGQ8-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 324+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-02 18:24 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 324+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> 2026-06-02 18:24 [PATCH v3 3/3] add helper functions for fast-path arg setup Reviewer <review@example.com>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox