agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. 327+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 +++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 51 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 378 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 167 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 808 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..3ae25f3444 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -489,12 +491,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids child_relids, Relids top_parent_relids) { - AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; - int nappinfos; - int cnt; - - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; + int nappinfos; + int cnt; appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,8 +571,9 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; - Relids tmp_result = NULL; + Relids tmp_result = relids; int cnt; /* @@ -579,12 +586,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -592,13 +604,15 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, tmp_result = adjust_child_relids_multilevel(root, relids, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); - relids = tmp_result; } - result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); + result = adjust_child_relids(tmp_result, nappinfos, appinfos); - /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) + /* + * Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. If recursive pass did't + * replace any relids, tmp_result point to the original set, not a copy. + */ + if (tmp_result != relids) bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); pfree(appinfos); @@ -715,11 +729,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +741,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..327505676c 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,384 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.29..33230.19 rows=33 width=8) + -> Append (cost=0.00..33008.08 rows=67 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16604.25 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 (cost=0.00..78.19 rows=5019 width=4) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.75 rows=1 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=4) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16399.75 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 (cost=0.00..76.81 rows=4981 width=4) + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big (cost=0.29..3.31 rows=1 width=5) + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..364b3216f8 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,173 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------3592BFA68FFAC61CCE0AF115-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 ++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 44 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 425 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 180 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 867 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..f4d12f76e1 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -490,12 +492,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids top_parent_relids) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,6 +571,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,13 +586,24 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + if (bms_is_subset(relids, normal_relids)) + { + /* Nothing to do. Parameters set points to plain relations only. */ + result = relids; + goto cleanup; + } + + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) { @@ -597,10 +615,11 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); +cleanup: /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) - bms_free(tmp_result); + bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); + bms_free(normal_relids); pfree(appinfos); return result; @@ -715,11 +734,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +746,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..3eddd9bec3 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,431 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + x | y +---+--- +(0 rows) + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on big + Recheck Cond: ((x = (small.x)::numeric) OR (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric)) + -> BitmapOr + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric) +(22 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + count +------- + 0 +(1 row) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..4d1dd5bec1 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,186 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.33.0 --------------9DCA5E9A07F91111D4169DAB-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. This technique cause changes of 'reparameterize by child' machinery. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 151 ++++++++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 28 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 14 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 209 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 99 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index e9b6968b1d..6ba6d32ae4 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 0dbe2ac726..6f900475bb 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1551,6 +1552,156 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs are impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_join_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_join_rel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nappinfos; + + child_join_relids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_join_relids, + &nappinfos); + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + nappinfos, appinfos); + pfree(appinfos); + + child_join_rel = find_join_rel(root, child_join_relids); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + child_join_rel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + /* + * If can't build JOIN between inner relation and one of the outer + * partitions - return immediately. + */ + return NIL; + } + } + else + { + /* + * TODO: + * Can't imagine situation when join relation already exists. But in + * the 'partition_join' regression test it happens. + * It may be an indicator of possible problems. + */ + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_join_rel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_join_rel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_join_rel); + result = lappend(result, child_join_rel); + } + return result; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (!enable_partitionwise_join) + return; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * MEMO: We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. It is not correct right now, however, a hook + * on add_path() to give additional decision for path removel allows + * to retain this kind of AppendPath, regardless of its cost. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath)) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_CATCH(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + PG_RE_THROW(); + } + PG_END_TRY(); + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..be4624b619 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -494,8 +496,6 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -565,6 +570,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,12 +585,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -715,11 +726,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +738,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index b248b038e0..73cfb4748d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4209,7 +4209,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index e105a4d5f1..f98a82e725 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -790,11 +790,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -851,8 +848,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index 035d3e1206..d64aa37f80 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..2bc7ad70d9 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,215 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------ + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) +(34 rows) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..c206fd736a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,105 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------8EB2F9A6243C623F4024291E-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v15] Avoid orphaned objects dependencies @ 2024-03-29 15:43 Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Bertrand Drouvot @ 2024-03-29 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw) It's currently possible to create orphaned objects dependencies, for example: Scenario 1: session 1: begin; drop schema schem; session 2: create a function in the schema schem session 1: commit; With the above, the function created in session 2 would be linked to a non existing schema. Scenario 2: session 1: begin; create a function in the schema schem session 2: drop schema schem; session 1: commit; With the above, the function created in session 1 would be linked to a non existing schema. To avoid those scenarios, a new lock (that conflicts with a lock taken by DROP) has been put in place before the dependencies are being recorded. With this in place, the drop schema in scenario 2 would be locked. Also, after the new lock attempt, the patch checks that the object still exists: with this in place session 2 in scenario 1 would be locked and would report an error once session 1 committs (that would not be the case should session 1 abort the transaction). If the object is dropped before the new lock attempt is triggered then the patch would also report an error (but with less details). The patch takes into account any type of objects except the ones that are pinned (they are not droppable because the system requires it). A special case is done for objects that belong to the RelationRelationId class. For those, we should be in one of the two following cases that would already prevent the relation to be dropped: 1. The relation is already locked (could be an existing relation or a relation that we are creating). 2. The relation is protected indirectly (i.e an index protected by a lock on its table, a table protected by a lock on a function that depends the table...) To avoid any risks for the RelationRelationId class case, we acquire a lock if there is none. That may add unnecessary lock for 2. but that's worth it. The patch adds a few tests for some dependency cases (that would currently produce orphaned objects): - schema and function (as the above scenarios) - alter a dependency (function and schema) - function and arg type - function and return type - function and function - domain and domain - table and type - server and foreign data wrapper --- src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c | 1 + src/backend/catalog/dependency.c | 212 ++++++++++++++++++ src/backend/catalog/heap.c | 7 + src/backend/catalog/index.c | 26 +++ src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c | 57 +++++ src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.c | 9 + src/backend/catalog/pg_attrdef.c | 1 + src/backend/catalog/pg_cast.c | 5 + src/backend/catalog/pg_collation.c | 1 + src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c | 26 +++ src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c | 2 + src/backend/catalog/pg_depend.c | 40 +++- src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.c | 19 ++ src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c | 17 +- src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c | 7 + src/backend/catalog/pg_range.c | 6 + src/backend/catalog/pg_type.c | 39 ++++ src/backend/catalog/toasting.c | 1 + src/backend/commands/alter.c | 4 + src/backend/commands/amcmds.c | 1 + src/backend/commands/cluster.c | 7 + src/backend/commands/event_trigger.c | 1 + src/backend/commands/extension.c | 5 + src/backend/commands/foreigncmds.c | 7 + src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c | 6 + src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c | 2 + src/backend/commands/opclasscmds.c | 18 ++ src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c | 30 +++ src/backend/commands/policy.c | 2 + src/backend/commands/proclang.c | 3 + src/backend/commands/sequence.c | 2 + src/backend/commands/statscmds.c | 10 + src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c | 34 ++- src/backend/commands/trigger.c | 29 ++- src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c | 73 +++++- src/backend/commands/typecmds.c | 84 +++++++ src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c | 1 + src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt | 1 + src/include/catalog/dependency.h | 3 + src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h | 1 + .../expected/test_dependencies_locks.out | 129 +++++++++++ src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule | 1 + .../specs/test_dependencies_locks.spec | 89 ++++++++ .../test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out | 4 +- .../expected/test_oat_hooks.out | 2 + src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out | 11 +- 46 files changed, 1011 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) 39.6% src/backend/catalog/ 30.5% src/backend/commands/ 16.7% src/test/isolation/expected/ 10.4% src/test/isolation/specs/ diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c b/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c index a44ccee3b6..9a24872a30 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/aclchk.c @@ -1413,6 +1413,7 @@ SetDefaultACL(InternalDefaultACL *iacls) referenced.objectId = iacls->nspid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, iacls->nspid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); } } diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c b/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c index 0489cbabcb..a3770d7206 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/dependency.c @@ -1519,6 +1519,81 @@ AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags) } } +/* + * LockNotPinnedObjectById + * + * Lock the object that we are about to record a dependency on. + * After it's locked, verify that it hasn't been dropped while we + * weren't looking. If the object has been dropped, this function + * does not return! + */ +void +LockNotPinnedObjectById(const ObjectAddress *object) +{ + char *object_description = NULL; + + if (isObjectPinned(object)) + return; + + object_description = getObjectDescription(object, true); + + if (object->classId == RelationRelationId) + { + Assert(!IsSharedRelation(object->objectId)); + + /* + * We must be in one of the two following cases that would already + * prevent the relation to be dropped: 1. The relation is already + * locked (could be an existing relation or a relation that we are + * creating). 2. The relation is protected indirectly (i.e an index + * protected by a lock on its table, a table protected by a lock on a + * function that depends of the table...). To avoid any risks, acquire + * a lock if there is none. That may add unnecessary lock for 2. but + * that's worth it. + */ + if (!CheckRelationOidLockedByMe(object->objectId, AccessShareLock, true)) + LockRelationOid(object->objectId, AccessShareLock); + } + else + { + /* assume we should lock the whole object not a sub-object */ + LockDatabaseObject(object->classId, object->objectId, 0, AccessShareLock); + } + + /* check if object still exists */ + if (!ObjectByIdExist(object)) + { + if (object_description) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_DOES_NOT_EXIST), + errmsg("%s does not exist", object_description))); + else + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_DOES_NOT_EXIST), + errmsg("a dependent object does not exist"))); + } + + if (object_description) + pfree(object_description); + + return; +} + +/* + * LockNotPinnedObject + * + * Lock the object that we are about to record a dependency on. + */ +void +LockNotPinnedObject(Oid classid, Oid objid) +{ + ObjectAddress object; + + ObjectAddressSet(object, classid, objid); + + LockNotPinnedObjectById(&object); +} + /* * ReleaseDeletionLock - release an object deletion lock * @@ -1730,6 +1805,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, if (rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION) { /* If it's a plain relation, reference this column */ + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, rte->relid); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, rte->relid, var->varattno, context->addrs); } @@ -1756,6 +1832,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, Oid objoid; /* A constant must depend on the constant's datatype */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, con->consttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, con->consttype, 0, context->addrs); @@ -1767,8 +1844,11 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, */ if (OidIsValid(con->constcollid) && con->constcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, con->constcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, con->constcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } /* * If it's a regclass or similar literal referring to an existing @@ -1785,59 +1865,83 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(PROCOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGOPEROID: case REGOPERATOROID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(OPEROID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGCLASSOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(RELOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGTYPEOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(TYPEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGCOLLATIONOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(COLLOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGCONFIGOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(TSCONFIGOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TSConfigRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(TSConfigRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGDICTIONARYOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(TSDICTOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TSDictionaryRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(TSDictionaryRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; case REGNAMESPACEOID: objoid = DatumGetObjectId(con->constvalue); if (SearchSysCacheExists1(NAMESPACEOID, ObjectIdGetDatum(objoid))) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, objoid); add_object_address(NamespaceRelationId, objoid, 0, context->addrs); + } break; /* @@ -1859,18 +1963,23 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, Param *param = (Param *) node; /* A parameter must depend on the parameter's datatype */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, param->paramtype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, param->paramtype, 0, context->addrs); /* and its collation, just as for Consts */ if (OidIsValid(param->paramcollid) && param->paramcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, param->paramcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, param->paramcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } } else if (IsA(node, FuncExpr)) { FuncExpr *funcexpr = (FuncExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, funcexpr->funcid); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, funcexpr->funcid, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1879,6 +1988,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { OpExpr *opexpr = (OpExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, opexpr->opno); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, opexpr->opno, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1887,6 +1997,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { DistinctExpr *distinctexpr = (DistinctExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, distinctexpr->opno); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, distinctexpr->opno, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1895,6 +2006,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { NullIfExpr *nullifexpr = (NullIfExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, nullifexpr->opno); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, nullifexpr->opno, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1903,6 +2015,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { ScalarArrayOpExpr *opexpr = (ScalarArrayOpExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, opexpr->opno); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, opexpr->opno, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1911,6 +2024,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { Aggref *aggref = (Aggref *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, aggref->aggfnoid); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, aggref->aggfnoid, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1919,6 +2033,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { WindowFunc *wfunc = (WindowFunc *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, wfunc->winfnoid); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, wfunc->winfnoid, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -1935,8 +2050,11 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, */ if (sbsref->refrestype != sbsref->refcontainertype && sbsref->refrestype != sbsref->refelemtype) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, sbsref->refrestype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, sbsref->refrestype, 0, context->addrs); + } /* fall through to examine arguments */ } else if (IsA(node, SubPlan)) @@ -1960,16 +2078,25 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, * anywhere else in the expression. */ if (OidIsValid(reltype)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, reltype); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, reltype, fselect->fieldnum, context->addrs); + } else + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, fselect->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, fselect->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); + } /* the collation might not be referenced anywhere else, either */ if (OidIsValid(fselect->resultcollid) && fselect->resultcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, fselect->resultcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, fselect->resultcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } } else if (IsA(node, FieldStore)) { @@ -1980,53 +2107,76 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, if (OidIsValid(reltype)) { ListCell *l; + bool locked = false; foreach(l, fstore->fieldnums) + { + if (!locked) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, reltype); + locked = true; + } add_object_address(RelationRelationId, reltype, lfirst_int(l), context->addrs); + } } else + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, fstore->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, fstore->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); + } } else if (IsA(node, RelabelType)) { RelabelType *relab = (RelabelType *) node; /* since there is no function dependency, need to depend on type */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, relab->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, relab->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); /* the collation might not be referenced anywhere else, either */ if (OidIsValid(relab->resultcollid) && relab->resultcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, relab->resultcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, relab->resultcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } } else if (IsA(node, CoerceViaIO)) { CoerceViaIO *iocoerce = (CoerceViaIO *) node; /* since there is no exposed function, need to depend on type */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, iocoerce->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, iocoerce->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); /* the collation might not be referenced anywhere else, either */ if (OidIsValid(iocoerce->resultcollid) && iocoerce->resultcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, iocoerce->resultcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, iocoerce->resultcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } } else if (IsA(node, ArrayCoerceExpr)) { ArrayCoerceExpr *acoerce = (ArrayCoerceExpr *) node; /* as above, depend on type */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, acoerce->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, acoerce->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); /* the collation might not be referenced anywhere else, either */ if (OidIsValid(acoerce->resultcollid) && acoerce->resultcollid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, acoerce->resultcollid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, acoerce->resultcollid, 0, context->addrs); + } /* fall through to examine arguments */ } else if (IsA(node, ConvertRowtypeExpr)) @@ -2034,6 +2184,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, ConvertRowtypeExpr *cvt = (ConvertRowtypeExpr *) node; /* since there is no function dependency, need to depend on type */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, cvt->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, cvt->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2041,6 +2192,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { CollateExpr *coll = (CollateExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, coll->collOid); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, coll->collOid, 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2048,6 +2200,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { RowExpr *rowexpr = (RowExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rowexpr->row_typeid); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, rowexpr->row_typeid, 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2058,11 +2211,13 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, foreach(l, rcexpr->opnos) { + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, lfirst_oid(l)); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, lfirst_oid(l), 0, context->addrs); } foreach(l, rcexpr->opfamilies) { + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorFamilyRelationId, lfirst_oid(l)); add_object_address(OperatorFamilyRelationId, lfirst_oid(l), 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2072,6 +2227,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { CoerceToDomain *cd = (CoerceToDomain *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, cd->resulttype); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, cd->resulttype, 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2079,6 +2235,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, { NextValueExpr *nve = (NextValueExpr *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, nve->seqid); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, nve->seqid, 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2087,19 +2244,26 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, OnConflictExpr *onconflict = (OnConflictExpr *) node; if (OidIsValid(onconflict->constraint)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, onconflict->constraint); add_object_address(ConstraintRelationId, onconflict->constraint, 0, context->addrs); + } /* fall through to examine arguments */ } else if (IsA(node, SortGroupClause)) { SortGroupClause *sgc = (SortGroupClause *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, sgc->eqop); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, sgc->eqop, 0, context->addrs); if (OidIsValid(sgc->sortop)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, sgc->sortop); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, sgc->sortop, 0, context->addrs); + } return false; } else if (IsA(node, WindowClause)) @@ -2107,15 +2271,24 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, WindowClause *wc = (WindowClause *) node; if (OidIsValid(wc->startInRangeFunc)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, wc->startInRangeFunc); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, wc->startInRangeFunc, 0, context->addrs); + } if (OidIsValid(wc->endInRangeFunc)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, wc->endInRangeFunc); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, wc->endInRangeFunc, 0, context->addrs); + } if (OidIsValid(wc->inRangeColl) && wc->inRangeColl != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, wc->inRangeColl); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, wc->inRangeColl, 0, context->addrs); + } /* fall through to examine substructure */ } else if (IsA(node, CTECycleClause)) @@ -2123,14 +2296,23 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, CTECycleClause *cc = (CTECycleClause *) node; if (OidIsValid(cc->cycle_mark_type)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_type); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_type, 0, context->addrs); + } if (OidIsValid(cc->cycle_mark_collation)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_collation); add_object_address(CollationRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_collation, 0, context->addrs); + } if (OidIsValid(cc->cycle_mark_neop)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_neop); add_object_address(OperatorRelationId, cc->cycle_mark_neop, 0, context->addrs); + } /* fall through to examine substructure */ } else if (IsA(node, Query)) @@ -2163,6 +2345,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, switch (rte->rtekind) { case RTE_RELATION: + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, rte->relid); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, rte->relid, 0, context->addrs); break; @@ -2215,12 +2398,18 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, rte = rt_fetch(query->resultRelation, query->rtable); if (rte->rtekind == RTE_RELATION) { + bool locked = false; foreach(lc, query->targetList) { TargetEntry *tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(lc); if (tle->resjunk) continue; /* ignore junk tlist items */ + if (!locked) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, rte->relid); + locked = true; + } add_object_address(RelationRelationId, rte->relid, tle->resno, context->addrs); } @@ -2232,6 +2421,7 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, */ foreach(lc, query->constraintDeps) { + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, lfirst_oid(lc)); add_object_address(ConstraintRelationId, lfirst_oid(lc), 0, context->addrs); } @@ -2266,16 +2456,25 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, */ foreach(ct, rtfunc->funccoltypes) { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, lfirst_oid(ct)); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, lfirst_oid(ct), 0, context->addrs); } foreach(ct, rtfunc->funccolcollations) { Oid collid = lfirst_oid(ct); + bool locked = false; if (OidIsValid(collid) && collid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + if (!locked) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, collid); + locked = true; + } add_object_address(CollationRelationId, collid, 0, context->addrs); + } } } else if (IsA(node, TableFunc)) @@ -2288,22 +2487,32 @@ find_expr_references_walker(Node *node, */ foreach(ct, tf->coltypes) { + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, lfirst_oid(ct)); add_object_address(TypeRelationId, lfirst_oid(ct), 0, context->addrs); } foreach(ct, tf->colcollations) { Oid collid = lfirst_oid(ct); + bool locked = false; if (OidIsValid(collid) && collid != DEFAULT_COLLATION_OID) + { + if (!locked) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, collid); + locked = true; + } add_object_address(CollationRelationId, collid, 0, context->addrs); + } } } else if (IsA(node, TableSampleClause)) { TableSampleClause *tsc = (TableSampleClause *) node; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, tsc->tsmhandler); add_object_address(ProcedureRelationId, tsc->tsmhandler, 0, context->addrs); /* fall through to examine arguments */ @@ -2354,9 +2563,12 @@ process_function_rte_ref(RangeTblEntry *rte, AttrNumber attnum, Assert(attnum - atts_done <= tupdesc->natts); if (OidIsValid(reltype)) /* can this fail? */ + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, reltype); add_object_address(RelationRelationId, reltype, attnum - atts_done, context->addrs); + } return; } /* Nothing to do; function's result type is handled elsewhere */ diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/heap.c b/src/backend/catalog/heap.c index 00074c8a94..1266101d90 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/heap.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/heap.c @@ -844,6 +844,7 @@ AddNewAttributeTuples(Oid new_rel_oid, /* Add dependency info */ ObjectAddressSubSet(myself, RelationRelationId, new_rel_oid, i + 1); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, attr->atttypid); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, attr->atttypid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* The default collation is pinned, so don't bother recording it */ @@ -852,6 +853,7 @@ AddNewAttributeTuples(Oid new_rel_oid, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CollationRelationId, attr->attcollation); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, attr->attcollation); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } } @@ -1459,11 +1461,13 @@ heap_create_with_catalog(const char *relname, ObjectAddressSet(referenced, NamespaceRelationId, relnamespace); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, relnamespace); if (reloftypeid) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, reloftypeid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, reloftypeid); } /* @@ -1477,6 +1481,7 @@ heap_create_with_catalog(const char *relname, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, AccessMethodRelationId, accessmtd); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, accessmtd); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); @@ -3391,6 +3396,7 @@ StorePartitionKey(Relation rel, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, OperatorClassRelationId, partopclass[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorClassRelationId, partopclass[i]); /* The default collation is pinned, so don't bother recording it */ if (OidIsValid(partcollation[i]) && @@ -3398,6 +3404,7 @@ StorePartitionKey(Relation rel, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CollationRelationId, partcollation[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, partcollation[i]); } } diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/index.c b/src/backend/catalog/index.c index a819b4197c..d6d1abfcf5 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/index.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/index.c @@ -1116,6 +1116,7 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, else { bool have_simple_col = false; + bool locked_object = false; addrs = new_object_addresses(); @@ -1128,6 +1129,12 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, heapRelationId, indexInfo->ii_IndexAttrNumbers[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + + if (!locked_object) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, heapRelationId); + locked_object = true; + } have_simple_col = true; } } @@ -1143,6 +1150,8 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, heapRelationId); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, heapRelationId); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); @@ -1158,9 +1167,13 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, if (OidIsValid(parentIndexRelid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, parentIndexRelid); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, parentIndexRelid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, heapRelationId); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, heapRelationId); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } @@ -1176,6 +1189,7 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CollationRelationId, collationIds[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, collationIds[i]); } } @@ -1184,6 +1198,7 @@ index_create(Relation heapRelation, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, OperatorClassRelationId, opclassIds[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorClassRelationId, opclassIds[i]); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); @@ -1988,6 +2003,14 @@ index_constraint_create(Relation heapRelation, */ ObjectAddressSet(myself, ConstraintRelationId, conOid); ObjectAddressSet(idxaddr, RelationRelationId, indexRelationId); + + /* + * CommandCounterIncrement() here to ensure the new constraint entry is + * visible when LockNotPinnedObject() will check its existence before + * recording the dependencies. + */ + CommandCounterIncrement(); + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, conOid); recordDependencyOn(&idxaddr, &myself, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); /* @@ -1999,9 +2022,12 @@ index_constraint_create(Relation heapRelation, ObjectAddress referenced; ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ConstraintRelationId, parentConstraintId); + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, parentConstraintId); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(heapRelation)); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(heapRelation)); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c index 2983b9180f..d3af0ae726 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/objectaddress.c @@ -2590,6 +2590,63 @@ get_object_namespace(const ObjectAddress *address) return oid; } +/* + * ObjectByIdExist + * + * Return whether the given object exists. + * + * Works for most catalogs, if no special processing is needed. + */ +bool +ObjectByIdExist(const ObjectAddress *address) +{ + HeapTuple tuple; + int cache; + const ObjectPropertyType *property; + + property = get_object_property_data(address->classId); + + cache = property->oid_catcache_id; + + if (cache >= 0) + { + /* Fetch tuple from syscache. */ + tuple = SearchSysCache1(cache, ObjectIdGetDatum(address->objectId)); + + if (!HeapTupleIsValid(tuple)) + { + return false; + } + + ReleaseSysCache(tuple); + + return true; + } + else + { + Relation rel; + ScanKeyData skey[1]; + SysScanDesc scan; + + rel = table_open(address->classId, AccessShareLock); + + ScanKeyInit(&skey[0], + get_object_attnum_oid(address->classId), + BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ, + ObjectIdGetDatum(address->objectId)); + + scan = systable_beginscan(rel, get_object_oid_index(address->classId), true, + NULL, 1, skey); + + /* we expect exactly one match */ + tuple = systable_getnext(scan); + systable_endscan(scan); + table_close(rel, AccessShareLock); + + return (HeapTupleIsValid(tuple)); + } +} + /* * Return ObjectType for the given object type as given by * getObjectTypeDescription; if no valid ObjectType code exists, but it's a diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.c index 90fc7db949..a47e3c5507 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_aggregate.c @@ -748,12 +748,14 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, /* Depends on transition function */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, transfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, transfn); /* Depends on final function, if any */ if (OidIsValid(finalfn)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, finalfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, finalfn); } /* Depends on combine function, if any */ @@ -761,6 +763,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, combinefn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, combinefn); } /* Depends on serialization function, if any */ @@ -768,6 +771,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, serialfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, serialfn); } /* Depends on deserialization function, if any */ @@ -775,6 +779,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, deserialfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, deserialfn); } /* Depends on forward transition function, if any */ @@ -782,6 +787,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, mtransfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, mtransfn); } /* Depends on inverse transition function, if any */ @@ -789,6 +795,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, minvtransfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, minvtransfn); } /* Depends on final function, if any */ @@ -796,6 +803,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, mfinalfn); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, mfinalfn); } /* Depends on sort operator, if any */ @@ -803,6 +811,7 @@ AggregateCreate(const char *aggName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, OperatorRelationId, sortop); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, sortop); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_attrdef.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_attrdef.c index 003ae70b4d..dcce454f00 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_attrdef.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_attrdef.c @@ -178,6 +178,7 @@ StoreAttrDefault(Relation rel, AttrNumber attnum, colobject.objectId = RelationGetRelid(rel); colobject.objectSubId = attnum; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(rel)); recordDependencyOn(&defobject, &colobject, attgenerated ? DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_cast.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_cast.c index 5a5b855d51..d3707e424c 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_cast.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_cast.c @@ -97,16 +97,19 @@ CastCreate(Oid sourcetypeid, Oid targettypeid, /* dependency on source type */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, sourcetypeid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, sourcetypeid); /* dependency on target type */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, targettypeid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, targettypeid); /* dependency on function */ if (OidIsValid(funcid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, funcid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, funcid); } /* dependencies on casts required for function */ @@ -114,11 +117,13 @@ CastCreate(Oid sourcetypeid, Oid targettypeid, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CastRelationId, incastid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(CastRelationId, incastid); } if (OidIsValid(outcastid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CastRelationId, outcastid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(CastRelationId, outcastid); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, behavior); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_collation.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_collation.c index 7f2f701229..78498b8c20 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_collation.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_collation.c @@ -218,6 +218,7 @@ CollationCreate(const char *collname, Oid collnamespace, referenced.classId = NamespaceRelationId; referenced.objectId = collnamespace; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, collnamespace); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* create dependency on owner */ diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c index 3baf9231ed..c4cdbd7c58 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_constraint.c @@ -252,17 +252,26 @@ CreateConstraintEntry(const char *constraintName, if (constraintNTotalKeys > 0) { + bool locked_object = false; + for (i = 0; i < constraintNTotalKeys; i++) { ObjectAddressSubSet(relobject, RelationRelationId, relId, constraintKey[i]); add_exact_object_address(&relobject, addrs_auto); + + if (!locked_object) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relId); + locked_object = true; + } } } else { ObjectAddressSet(relobject, RelationRelationId, relId); add_exact_object_address(&relobject, addrs_auto); + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relId); } } @@ -275,6 +284,7 @@ CreateConstraintEntry(const char *constraintName, ObjectAddressSet(domobject, TypeRelationId, domainId); add_exact_object_address(&domobject, addrs_auto); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, domainId); } record_object_address_dependencies(&conobject, addrs_auto, @@ -294,17 +304,26 @@ CreateConstraintEntry(const char *constraintName, if (foreignNKeys > 0) { + bool locked_object = false; + for (i = 0; i < foreignNKeys; i++) { ObjectAddressSubSet(relobject, RelationRelationId, foreignRelId, foreignKey[i]); add_exact_object_address(&relobject, addrs_normal); + + if (!locked_object) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, foreignRelId); + locked_object = true; + } } } else { ObjectAddressSet(relobject, RelationRelationId, foreignRelId); add_exact_object_address(&relobject, addrs_normal); + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, foreignRelId); } } @@ -320,6 +339,7 @@ CreateConstraintEntry(const char *constraintName, ObjectAddressSet(relobject, RelationRelationId, indexRelId); add_exact_object_address(&relobject, addrs_normal); + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, indexRelId); } if (foreignNKeys > 0) @@ -339,15 +359,18 @@ CreateConstraintEntry(const char *constraintName, { oprobject.objectId = pfEqOp[i]; add_exact_object_address(&oprobject, addrs_normal); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, pfEqOp[i]); if (ppEqOp[i] != pfEqOp[i]) { oprobject.objectId = ppEqOp[i]; add_exact_object_address(&oprobject, addrs_normal); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, ppEqOp[i]); } if (ffEqOp[i] != pfEqOp[i]) { oprobject.objectId = ffEqOp[i]; add_exact_object_address(&oprobject, addrs_normal); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, ffEqOp[i]); } } } @@ -858,9 +881,12 @@ ConstraintSetParentConstraint(Oid childConstrId, ObjectAddressSet(depender, ConstraintRelationId, childConstrId); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ConstraintRelationId, parentConstrId); + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, parentConstrId); recordDependencyOn(&depender, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, childTableId); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, childTableId); recordDependencyOn(&depender, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } else diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c index 0770878eac..25881654d6 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_conversion.c @@ -116,12 +116,14 @@ ConversionCreate(const char *conname, Oid connamespace, referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = conproc; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, conproc); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* create dependency on namespace */ referenced.classId = NamespaceRelationId; referenced.objectId = connamespace; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, connamespace); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* create dependency on owner */ diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_depend.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_depend.c index cfd7ef51df..ebca5a452b 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_depend.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_depend.c @@ -20,21 +20,21 @@ #include "catalog/catalog.h" #include "catalog/dependency.h" #include "catalog/indexing.h" +#include "catalog/pg_auth_members.h" #include "catalog/pg_constraint.h" #include "catalog/pg_depend.h" #include "catalog/pg_extension.h" #include "catalog/partition.h" #include "commands/extension.h" #include "miscadmin.h" +#include "storage/lmgr.h" +#include "storage/lock.h" #include "utils/fmgroids.h" #include "utils/lsyscache.h" #include "utils/syscache.h" #include "utils/rel.h" -static bool isObjectPinned(const ObjectAddress *object); - - /* * Record a dependency between 2 objects via their respective objectAddress. * The first argument is the dependent object, the second the one it @@ -100,6 +100,37 @@ recordMultipleDependencies(const ObjectAddress *depender, slot_init_count = 0; for (i = 0; i < nreferenced; i++, referenced++) { +#ifdef USE_ASSERT_CHECKING + if (!isObjectPinned(referenced)) + { + if (referenced->classId != RelationRelationId) + { + LOCKTAG tag; + + SET_LOCKTAG_OBJECT(tag, + MyDatabaseId, + referenced->classId, + referenced->objectId, + 0); + /* assert the referenced object is locked */ + Assert(LockHeldByMe(&tag, AccessShareLock, false)); + } + else + { + Assert(!IsSharedRelation(referenced->objectId)); + + /* + * Assert the referenced object is locked if it should be + * visible (see the comment related to LockNotPinnedObject() + * in TypeCreate()). + */ + Assert(!ObjectByIdExist(referenced) || + CheckRelationOidLockedByMe(referenced->objectId, + AccessShareLock, true)); + } + } +#endif + /* * If the referenced object is pinned by the system, there's no real * need to record dependencies on it. This saves lots of space in @@ -239,6 +270,7 @@ recordDependencyOnCurrentExtension(const ObjectAddress *object, extension.objectId = CurrentExtensionObject; extension.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ExtensionRelationId, CurrentExtensionObject); recordDependencyOn(object, &extension, DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION); } } @@ -706,7 +738,7 @@ changeDependenciesOn(Oid refClassId, Oid oldRefObjectId, * The passed subId, if any, is ignored; we assume that only whole objects * are pinned (and that this implies pinning their components). */ -static bool +bool isObjectPinned(const ObjectAddress *object) { return IsPinnedObject(object->classId, object->objectId); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.c index 65b45a424a..e8374eec88 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_operator.c @@ -251,6 +251,16 @@ OperatorShellMake(const char *operatorName, values[Anum_pg_operator_oprrest - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(InvalidOid); values[Anum_pg_operator_oprjoin - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(InvalidOid); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + if (OidIsValid(operatorNamespace)) + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, operatorNamespace); + + if (OidIsValid(leftTypeId)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, leftTypeId); + + if (OidIsValid(rightTypeId)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rightTypeId); + /* * create a new operator tuple */ @@ -513,6 +523,15 @@ OperatorCreate(const char *operatorName, CatalogTupleInsert(pg_operator_desc, tup); } + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, operatorNamespace); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, leftTypeId); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rightTypeId); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, operResultType); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procedureId); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, restrictionId); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, joinId); + /* Add dependencies for the entry */ address = makeOperatorDependencies(tup, true, isUpdate); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c index 528c17cd7f..116e524390 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_proc.c @@ -593,6 +593,13 @@ ProcedureCreate(const char *procedureName, if (is_update) deleteDependencyRecordsFor(ProcedureRelationId, retval, true); + /* + * CommandCounterIncrement() here to ensure the new function entry is + * visible when LockNotPinnedObject() will check its existence before + * recording the dependencies. + */ + CommandCounterIncrement(); + addrs = new_object_addresses(); ObjectAddressSet(myself, ProcedureRelationId, retval); @@ -600,20 +607,24 @@ ProcedureCreate(const char *procedureName, /* dependency on namespace */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, NamespaceRelationId, procNamespace); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, procNamespace); /* dependency on implementation language */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, LanguageRelationId, languageObjectId); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(LanguageRelationId, languageObjectId); /* dependency on return type */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, returnType); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, returnType); /* dependency on transform used by return type, if any */ if ((trfid = get_transform_oid(returnType, languageObjectId, true))) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TransformRelationId, trfid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TransformRelationId, trfid); } /* dependency on parameter types */ @@ -621,12 +632,14 @@ ProcedureCreate(const char *procedureName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, allParams[i]); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, allParams[i]); /* dependency on transform used by parameter type, if any */ if ((trfid = get_transform_oid(allParams[i], languageObjectId, true))) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TransformRelationId, trfid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TransformRelationId, trfid); } } @@ -635,6 +648,7 @@ ProcedureCreate(const char *procedureName, { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, prosupport); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, prosupport); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); @@ -674,9 +688,6 @@ ProcedureCreate(const char *procedureName, ArrayType *set_items = NULL; int save_nestlevel = 0; - /* Advance command counter so new tuple can be seen by validator */ - CommandCounterIncrement(); - /* * Set per-function configuration parameters so that the validation is * done with the environment the function expects. However, if diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c index 0602398a54..b44a7f9d78 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_publication.c @@ -438,10 +438,13 @@ publication_add_relation(Oid pubid, PublicationRelInfo *pri, /* Add dependency on the publication */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, PublicationRelationId, pubid); + LockNotPinnedObject(PublicationRelationId, pubid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* Add dependency on the relation */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, relid); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* Add dependency on the objects mentioned in the qualifications */ @@ -454,6 +457,8 @@ publication_add_relation(Oid pubid, PublicationRelInfo *pri, for (int i = 0; i < natts; i++) { ObjectAddressSubSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, relid, attarray[i]); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -661,10 +666,12 @@ publication_add_schema(Oid pubid, Oid schemaid, bool if_not_exists) /* Add dependency on the publication */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, PublicationRelationId, pubid); + LockNotPinnedObject(PublicationRelationId, pubid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* Add dependency on the schema */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, NamespaceRelationId, schemaid); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, schemaid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* Close the table */ diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_range.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_range.c index 501a6ba410..e5b5a0b6f8 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_range.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_range.c @@ -70,26 +70,31 @@ RangeCreate(Oid rangeTypeOid, Oid rangeSubType, Oid rangeCollation, ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, rangeSubType); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rangeSubType); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, OperatorClassRelationId, rangeSubOpclass); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorClassRelationId, rangeSubOpclass); if (OidIsValid(rangeCollation)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, CollationRelationId, rangeCollation); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, rangeCollation); } if (OidIsValid(rangeCanonical)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, rangeCanonical); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, rangeCanonical); } if (OidIsValid(rangeSubDiff)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, rangeSubDiff); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, rangeSubDiff); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); @@ -99,6 +104,7 @@ RangeCreate(Oid rangeTypeOid, Oid rangeSubType, Oid rangeCollation, referencing.classId = TypeRelationId; referencing.objectId = multirangeTypeOid; referencing.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rangeTypeOid); recordDependencyOn(&referencing, &myself, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); table_close(pg_range, RowExclusiveLock); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/pg_type.c b/src/backend/catalog/pg_type.c index 395dec8ed8..82ee7bc2e3 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/pg_type.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/pg_type.c @@ -157,6 +157,12 @@ TypeShellMake(const char *typeName, Oid typeNamespace, Oid ownerId) * Create dependencies. We can/must skip this in bootstrap mode. */ if (!IsBootstrapProcessingMode()) + { + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, typeNamespace); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, F_SHELL_IN); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, F_SHELL_OUT); + GenerateTypeDependencies(tup, pg_type_desc, NULL, @@ -166,6 +172,7 @@ TypeShellMake(const char *typeName, Oid typeNamespace, Oid ownerId) false, true, /* make extension dependency */ false); + } /* Post creation hook for new shell type */ InvokeObjectPostCreateHook(TypeRelationId, typoid, 0); @@ -494,6 +501,37 @@ TypeCreate(Oid newTypeOid, * Create dependencies. We can/must skip this in bootstrap mode. */ if (!IsBootstrapProcessingMode()) + { + /* + * CommandCounterIncrement() here to ensure the new type entry is + * visible when LockNotPinnedObject() will check its existence before + * recording the dependencies. + */ + CommandCounterIncrement(); + + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, typeNamespace); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, inputProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, outputProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, receiveProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, sendProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typmodinProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typmodoutProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, analyzeProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, subscriptProcedure); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, baseType); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, typeCollation); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, elementType); + + /* + * No need to call LockRelationOid() (through LockNotPinnedObject()) + * on relationOid as relationOid is set to an InvalidOid or to a new + * Oid not added to pg_class yet (In heap_create_with_catalog(), + * AddNewRelationType() is called before AddNewRelationTuple()). + */ + if (relationKind == RELKIND_COMPOSITE_TYPE) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeObjectId); + GenerateTypeDependencies(tup, pg_type_desc, (defaultTypeBin ? @@ -505,6 +543,7 @@ TypeCreate(Oid newTypeOid, isDependentType, true, /* make extension dependency */ rebuildDeps); + } /* Post creation hook for new type */ InvokeObjectPostCreateHook(TypeRelationId, typeObjectId, 0); diff --git a/src/backend/catalog/toasting.c b/src/backend/catalog/toasting.c index 738bc46ae8..a4d8342ca1 100644 --- a/src/backend/catalog/toasting.c +++ b/src/backend/catalog/toasting.c @@ -367,6 +367,7 @@ create_toast_table(Relation rel, Oid toastOid, Oid toastIndexOid, toastobject.objectId = toast_relid; toastobject.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relOid); recordDependencyOn(&toastobject, &baseobject, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } diff --git a/src/backend/commands/alter.c b/src/backend/commands/alter.c index 4f99ebb447..57e86f576a 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/alter.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/alter.c @@ -501,7 +501,10 @@ ExecAlterObjectDependsStmt(AlterObjectDependsStmt *stmt, ObjectAddress *refAddre currexts = getAutoExtensionsOfObject(address.classId, address.objectId); if (!list_member_oid(currexts, refAddr.objectId)) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(refAddr.classId, refAddr.objectId); recordDependencyOn(&address, &refAddr, DEPENDENCY_AUTO_EXTENSION); + } } return address; @@ -807,6 +810,7 @@ AlterObjectNamespace_internal(Relation rel, Oid objid, Oid nspOid) pfree(replaces); /* update dependency to point to the new schema */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, nspOid); if (changeDependencyFor(classId, objid, NamespaceRelationId, oldNspOid, nspOid) != 1) elog(ERROR, "could not change schema dependency for object %u", diff --git a/src/backend/commands/amcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/amcmds.c index aaa0f9a1dc..8616a7c9fa 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/amcmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/amcmds.c @@ -104,6 +104,7 @@ CreateAccessMethod(CreateAmStmt *stmt) referenced.objectId = amhandler; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, amhandler); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); recordDependencyOnCurrentExtension(&myself, false); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c index 78f96789b0..fb95d17738 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/cluster.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/cluster.c @@ -1272,6 +1272,7 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class, */ if (relam1 != relam2) { + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, relam2); if (changeDependencyFor(RelationRelationId, r1, AccessMethodRelationId, @@ -1280,6 +1281,8 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class, elog(ERROR, "could not change access method dependency for relation \"%s.%s\"", get_namespace_name(get_rel_namespace(r1)), get_rel_name(r1)); + + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, relam1); if (changeDependencyFor(RelationRelationId, r2, AccessMethodRelationId, @@ -1381,6 +1384,8 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class, { baseobject.objectId = r1; toastobject.objectId = relform1->reltoastrelid; + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, r1); recordDependencyOn(&toastobject, &baseobject, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } @@ -1389,6 +1394,8 @@ swap_relation_files(Oid r1, Oid r2, bool target_is_pg_class, { baseobject.objectId = r2; toastobject.objectId = relform2->reltoastrelid; + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, r2); recordDependencyOn(&toastobject, &baseobject, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } diff --git a/src/backend/commands/event_trigger.c b/src/backend/commands/event_trigger.c index 7a5ed6b985..8d0cdec59e 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/event_trigger.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/event_trigger.c @@ -327,6 +327,7 @@ insert_event_trigger_tuple(const char *trigname, const char *eventname, Oid evtO referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = funcoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, funcoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* Depend on extension, if any. */ diff --git a/src/backend/commands/extension.c b/src/backend/commands/extension.c index 1643c8c69a..669a5d6dd8 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/extension.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/extension.c @@ -1924,6 +1924,7 @@ InsertExtensionTuple(const char *extName, Oid extOwner, ObjectAddressSet(nsp, NamespaceRelationId, schemaOid); add_exact_object_address(&nsp, refobjs); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, schemaOid); foreach(lc, requiredExtensions) { @@ -1932,6 +1933,7 @@ InsertExtensionTuple(const char *extName, Oid extOwner, ObjectAddressSet(otherext, ExtensionRelationId, reqext); add_exact_object_address(&otherext, refobjs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ExtensionRelationId, reqext); } /* Record all of them (this includes duplicate elimination) */ @@ -2968,6 +2970,7 @@ AlterExtensionNamespace(const char *extensionName, const char *newschema, Oid *o table_close(extRel, RowExclusiveLock); /* update dependency to point to the new schema */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, nspOid); if (changeDependencyFor(ExtensionRelationId, extensionOid, NamespaceRelationId, oldNspOid, nspOid) != 1) elog(ERROR, "could not change schema dependency for extension %s", @@ -3258,6 +3261,7 @@ ApplyExtensionUpdates(Oid extensionOid, otherext.objectId = reqext; otherext.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ExtensionRelationId, reqext); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &otherext, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -3414,6 +3418,7 @@ ExecAlterExtensionContentsRecurse(AlterExtensionContentsStmt *stmt, /* * OK, add the dependency. */ + LockNotPinnedObject(extension.classId, extension.objectId); recordDependencyOn(&object, &extension, DEPENDENCY_EXTENSION); /* diff --git a/src/backend/commands/foreigncmds.c b/src/backend/commands/foreigncmds.c index cf61bbac1f..735bca486c 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/foreigncmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/foreigncmds.c @@ -642,6 +642,7 @@ CreateForeignDataWrapper(ParseState *pstate, CreateFdwStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = fdwhandler; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, fdwhandler); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -650,6 +651,7 @@ CreateForeignDataWrapper(ParseState *pstate, CreateFdwStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = fdwvalidator; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, fdwvalidator); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -811,6 +813,7 @@ AlterForeignDataWrapper(ParseState *pstate, AlterFdwStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = fdwhandler; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, fdwhandler); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -819,6 +822,7 @@ AlterForeignDataWrapper(ParseState *pstate, AlterFdwStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = fdwvalidator; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, fdwvalidator); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } } @@ -951,6 +955,7 @@ CreateForeignServer(CreateForeignServerStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ForeignDataWrapperRelationId; referenced.objectId = fdw->fdwid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ForeignDataWrapperRelationId, fdw->fdwid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); recordDependencyOnOwner(ForeignServerRelationId, srvId, ownerId); @@ -1195,6 +1200,7 @@ CreateUserMapping(CreateUserMappingStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ForeignServerRelationId; referenced.objectId = srv->serverid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ForeignServerRelationId, srv->serverid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); if (OidIsValid(useId)) @@ -1472,6 +1478,7 @@ CreateForeignTable(CreateForeignTableStmt *stmt, Oid relid) referenced.classId = ForeignServerRelationId; referenced.objectId = server->serverid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ForeignServerRelationId, server->serverid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); table_close(ftrel, RowExclusiveLock); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c index 6593fd7d81..8207ef08b3 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/functioncmds.c @@ -1446,6 +1446,7 @@ AlterFunction(ParseState *pstate, AlterFunctionStmt *stmt) /* Add or replace dependency on support function */ if (OidIsValid(procForm->prosupport)) { + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, newsupport); if (changeDependencyFor(ProcedureRelationId, funcOid, ProcedureRelationId, procForm->prosupport, newsupport) != 1) @@ -1459,6 +1460,7 @@ AlterFunction(ParseState *pstate, AlterFunctionStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = newsupport; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, newsupport); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -1962,21 +1964,25 @@ CreateTransform(CreateTransformStmt *stmt) /* dependency on language */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, LanguageRelationId, langid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(LanguageRelationId, langid); /* dependency on type */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TypeRelationId, typeid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeid); /* dependencies on functions */ if (OidIsValid(fromsqlfuncid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, fromsqlfuncid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, fromsqlfuncid); } if (OidIsValid(tosqlfuncid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, tosqlfuncid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, tosqlfuncid); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c index 2caab88aa5..e6ff8476e8 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/indexcmds.c @@ -4380,8 +4380,10 @@ IndexSetParentIndex(Relation partitionIdx, Oid parentOid) ObjectAddressSet(parentIdx, RelationRelationId, parentOid); ObjectAddressSet(partitionTbl, RelationRelationId, partitionIdx->rd_index->indrelid); + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, parentOid); recordDependencyOn(&partIdx, &parentIdx, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, partitionIdx->rd_index->indrelid); recordDependencyOn(&partIdx, &partitionTbl, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } diff --git a/src/backend/commands/opclasscmds.c b/src/backend/commands/opclasscmds.c index b8b5c147c5..e70afd216c 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/opclasscmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/opclasscmds.c @@ -298,12 +298,14 @@ CreateOpFamily(CreateOpFamilyStmt *stmt, const char *opfname, referenced.classId = AccessMethodRelationId; referenced.objectId = amoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, amoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* dependency on namespace */ referenced.classId = NamespaceRelationId; referenced.objectId = namespaceoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* dependency on owner */ @@ -725,18 +727,21 @@ DefineOpClass(CreateOpClassStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = NamespaceRelationId; referenced.objectId = namespaceoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* dependency on opfamily */ referenced.classId = OperatorFamilyRelationId; referenced.objectId = opfamilyoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorFamilyRelationId, opfamilyoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); /* dependency on indexed datatype */ referenced.classId = TypeRelationId; referenced.objectId = typeoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* dependency on storage datatype */ @@ -745,6 +750,7 @@ DefineOpClass(CreateOpClassStmt *stmt) referenced.classId = TypeRelationId; referenced.objectId = storageoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, storageoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } @@ -1486,6 +1492,13 @@ storeOperators(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, heap_freetuple(tup); + /* + * CommandCounterIncrement() here to ensure the new operator entry is + * visible when LockNotPinnedObject() will check its existence before + * recording the dependencies. + */ + CommandCounterIncrement(); + /* Make its dependencies */ myself.classId = AccessMethodOperatorRelationId; myself.objectId = entryoid; @@ -1496,6 +1509,7 @@ storeOperators(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, referenced.objectSubId = 0; /* see comments in amapi.h about dependency strength */ + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorRelationId, op->object); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, op->ref_is_hard ? DEPENDENCY_NORMAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); @@ -1504,6 +1518,7 @@ storeOperators(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, referenced.objectId = op->refobjid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(referenced.classId, op->refobjid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, op->ref_is_hard ? DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); @@ -1514,6 +1529,7 @@ storeOperators(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, referenced.objectId = op->sortfamily; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(OperatorFamilyRelationId, op->sortfamily); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, op->ref_is_hard ? DEPENDENCY_NORMAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); } @@ -1597,6 +1613,7 @@ storeProcedures(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, referenced.objectSubId = 0; /* see comments in amapi.h about dependency strength */ + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, proc->object); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, proc->ref_is_hard ? DEPENDENCY_NORMAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); @@ -1605,6 +1622,7 @@ storeProcedures(List *opfamilyname, Oid amoid, Oid opfamilyoid, referenced.objectId = proc->refobjid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(referenced.classId, proc->refobjid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, proc->ref_is_hard ? DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c index 5872a3e192..58a69e7cc2 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/operatorcmds.c @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include "access/htup_details.h" #include "access/table.h" +#include "catalog/dependency.h" #include "catalog/indexing.h" #include "catalog/objectaccess.h" #include "catalog/pg_namespace.h" @@ -656,11 +657,15 @@ AlterOperator(AlterOperatorStmt *stmt) { replaces[Anum_pg_operator_oprrest - 1] = true; values[Anum_pg_operator_oprrest - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(restrictionOid); + if (OidIsValid(restrictionOid)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, restrictionOid); } if (updateJoin) { replaces[Anum_pg_operator_oprjoin - 1] = true; values[Anum_pg_operator_oprjoin - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(joinOid); + if (OidIsValid(joinOid)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, joinOid); } if (OidIsValid(commutatorOid)) { @@ -688,6 +693,31 @@ AlterOperator(AlterOperatorStmt *stmt) CatalogTupleUpdate(catalog, &tup->t_self, tup); + + /* Lock dependent objects */ + oprForm = (Form_pg_operator) GETSTRUCT(tup); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprnamespace)) + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, oprForm->oprnamespace); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprleft)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, oprForm->oprleft); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprright)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, oprForm->oprright); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprresult)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, oprForm->oprresult); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprcode)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, oprForm->oprcode); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprrest)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, oprForm->oprrest); + + if (OidIsValid(oprForm->oprjoin)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, oprForm->oprjoin); + address = makeOperatorDependencies(tup, false, true); if (OidIsValid(commutatorOid) || OidIsValid(negatorOid)) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/policy.c b/src/backend/commands/policy.c index 6ff3eba824..9da98cbeec 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/policy.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/policy.c @@ -722,6 +722,7 @@ CreatePolicy(CreatePolicyStmt *stmt) myself.objectId = policy_id; myself.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, table_id); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &target, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); recordDependencyOnExpr(&myself, qual, qual_pstate->p_rtable, @@ -1053,6 +1054,7 @@ AlterPolicy(AlterPolicyStmt *stmt) myself.objectId = policy_id; myself.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, table_id); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &target, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); recordDependencyOnExpr(&myself, qual, qual_parse_rtable, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/proclang.c b/src/backend/commands/proclang.c index 881f90017e..fadfd9064f 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/proclang.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/proclang.c @@ -190,12 +190,14 @@ CreateProceduralLanguage(CreatePLangStmt *stmt) /* dependency on the PL handler function */ ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, handlerOid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, handlerOid); /* dependency on the inline handler function, if any */ if (OidIsValid(inlineOid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, inlineOid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, inlineOid); } /* dependency on the validator function, if any */ @@ -203,6 +205,7 @@ CreateProceduralLanguage(CreatePLangStmt *stmt) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ProcedureRelationId, valOid); add_exact_object_address(&referenced, addrs); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, valOid); } record_object_address_dependencies(&myself, addrs, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/sequence.c b/src/backend/commands/sequence.c index 9f28d40466..c0634d0af9 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/sequence.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/sequence.c @@ -1688,6 +1688,8 @@ process_owned_by(Relation seqrel, List *owned_by, bool for_identity) depobject.classId = RelationRelationId; depobject.objectId = RelationGetRelid(seqrel); depobject.objectSubId = 0; + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(tablerel)); recordDependencyOn(&depobject, &refobject, deptype); } diff --git a/src/backend/commands/statscmds.c b/src/backend/commands/statscmds.c index 1db3ef69d2..9f0b03388a 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/statscmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/statscmds.c @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ CreateStatistics(CreateStatsStmt *stmt) bool build_mcv; bool build_expressions; bool requested_type = false; + bool locked_object = false; int i; ListCell *cell; ListCell *cell2; @@ -536,6 +537,12 @@ CreateStatistics(CreateStatsStmt *stmt) for (i = 0; i < nattnums; i++) { ObjectAddressSubSet(parentobject, RelationRelationId, relid, attnums[i]); + + if (!locked_object) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relid); + locked_object = true; + } recordDependencyOn(&myself, &parentobject, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); } @@ -553,6 +560,8 @@ CreateStatistics(CreateStatsStmt *stmt) if (!nattnums) { ObjectAddressSet(parentobject, RelationRelationId, relid); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, relid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &parentobject, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); } @@ -573,6 +582,7 @@ CreateStatistics(CreateStatsStmt *stmt) * than the underlying table(s). */ ObjectAddressSet(parentobject, NamespaceRelationId, namespaceId); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceId); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &parentobject, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); recordDependencyOnOwner(StatisticExtRelationId, statoid, stxowner); diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c index dbfe0d6b1c..fc7ddf0968 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tablecmds.c @@ -3419,6 +3419,7 @@ StoreCatalogInheritance1(Oid relationId, Oid parentOid, childobject.objectId = relationId; childobject.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, parentOid); recordDependencyOn(&childobject, &parentobject, child_dependency_type(child_is_partition)); @@ -7342,7 +7343,9 @@ ATExecAddColumn(List **wqueue, AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel, /* * Add needed dependency entries for the new column. */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, attribute->atttypid); add_column_datatype_dependency(myrelid, newattnum, attribute->atttypid); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, attribute->attcollation); add_column_collation_dependency(myrelid, newattnum, attribute->attcollation); /* @@ -10167,6 +10170,7 @@ addFkRecurseReferenced(List **wqueue, Constraint *fkconstraint, Relation rel, ObjectAddress referenced; ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ConstraintRelationId, parentConstr); + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, parentConstr); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } @@ -10458,8 +10462,11 @@ addFkRecurseReferencing(List **wqueue, Constraint *fkconstraint, Relation rel, */ ObjectAddressSet(address, ConstraintRelationId, constrOid); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ConstraintRelationId, parentConstr); + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, parentConstr); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, partitionId); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, partitionId); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); /* Make all this visible before recursing */ @@ -10960,9 +10967,12 @@ CloneFkReferencing(List **wqueue, Relation parentRel, Relation partRel) /* Set up partition dependencies for the new constraint */ ObjectAddressSet(address, ConstraintRelationId, constrOid); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, ConstraintRelationId, parentConstrOid); + LockDatabaseObject(ConstraintRelationId, parentConstrOid, 0, AccessShareLock); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(partRel)); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(partRel)); recordDependencyOn(&address, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); /* Done with the cloned constraint's tuple */ @@ -13248,7 +13258,9 @@ ATExecAlterColumnType(AlteredTableInfo *tab, Relation rel, table_close(attrelation, RowExclusiveLock); /* Install dependencies on new datatype and collation */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, targettype); add_column_datatype_dependency(RelationGetRelid(rel), attnum, targettype); + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, targetcollid); add_column_collation_dependency(RelationGetRelid(rel), attnum, targetcollid); /* @@ -14810,6 +14822,7 @@ ATExecSetAccessMethodNoStorage(Relation rel, Oid newAccessMethodId) */ ObjectAddressSet(relobj, RelationRelationId, reloid); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, AccessMethodRelationId, rd_rel->relam); + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, rd_rel->relam); recordDependencyOn(&relobj, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } else if (OidIsValid(oldAccessMethodId) && @@ -14829,6 +14842,7 @@ ATExecSetAccessMethodNoStorage(Relation rel, Oid newAccessMethodId) OidIsValid(rd_rel->relam)); /* Both are valid, so update the dependency */ + LockNotPinnedObject(AccessMethodRelationId, rd_rel->relam); changeDependencyFor(RelationRelationId, reloid, AccessMethodRelationId, oldAccessMethodId, rd_rel->relam); @@ -16428,6 +16442,7 @@ ATExecAddOf(Relation rel, const TypeName *ofTypename, LOCKMODE lockmode) typeobj.classId = TypeRelationId; typeobj.objectId = typeid; typeobj.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeid); recordDependencyOn(&tableobj, &typeobj, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); /* Update pg_class.reloftype */ @@ -17186,14 +17201,17 @@ AlterRelationNamespaceInternal(Relation classRel, Oid relOid, CatalogTupleUpdate(classRel, &classTup->t_self, classTup); /* Update dependency on schema if caller said so */ - if (hasDependEntry && - changeDependencyFor(RelationRelationId, - relOid, - NamespaceRelationId, - oldNspOid, - newNspOid) != 1) - elog(ERROR, "could not change schema dependency for relation \"%s\"", - NameStr(classForm->relname)); + if (hasDependEntry) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, newNspOid); + if (changeDependencyFor(RelationRelationId, + relOid, + NamespaceRelationId, + oldNspOid, + newNspOid) != 1) + elog(ERROR, "could not change schema dependency for relation \"%s\"", + NameStr(classForm->relname)); + } } if (!already_done) { diff --git a/src/backend/commands/trigger.c b/src/backend/commands/trigger.c index 170360edda..1250673b16 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/trigger.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/trigger.c @@ -1018,8 +1018,6 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, ((Form_pg_class) GETSTRUCT(tuple))->relhastriggers = true; CatalogTupleUpdate(pgrel, &tuple->t_self, tuple); - - CommandCounterIncrement(); } else CacheInvalidateRelcacheByTuple(tuple); @@ -1027,6 +1025,13 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, heap_freetuple(tuple); table_close(pgrel, RowExclusiveLock); + /* + * CommandCounterIncrement() here to ensure the new trigger entry is + * visible when LockNotPinnedObject() will check its existence before + * recording the dependencies. + */ + CommandCounterIncrement(); + /* * If we're replacing a trigger, flush all the old dependencies before * recording new ones. @@ -1045,6 +1050,7 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, referenced.classId = ProcedureRelationId; referenced.objectId = funcoid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, funcoid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); if (isInternal && OidIsValid(constraintOid)) @@ -1058,6 +1064,7 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, referenced.classId = ConstraintRelationId; referenced.objectId = constraintOid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(ConstraintRelationId, constraintOid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } else @@ -1070,6 +1077,8 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, referenced.classId = RelationRelationId; referenced.objectId = RelationGetRelid(rel); referenced.objectSubId = 0; + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(rel)); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); if (OidIsValid(constrrelid)) @@ -1077,6 +1086,8 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, referenced.classId = RelationRelationId; referenced.objectId = constrrelid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, constrrelid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_AUTO); } /* Not possible to have an index dependency in this case */ @@ -1091,6 +1102,7 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, referenced.classId = ConstraintRelationId; referenced.objectId = constraintOid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(TriggerRelationId, trigoid); recordDependencyOn(&referenced, &myself, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } @@ -1100,8 +1112,11 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, if (OidIsValid(parentTriggerOid)) { ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TriggerRelationId, parentTriggerOid); + LockNotPinnedObject(TriggerRelationId, parentTriggerOid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(rel)); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(rel)); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } } @@ -1110,12 +1125,19 @@ CreateTriggerFiringOn(CreateTrigStmt *stmt, const char *queryString, if (columns != NULL) { int i; + bool locked_object = false; referenced.classId = RelationRelationId; referenced.objectId = RelationGetRelid(rel); for (i = 0; i < ncolumns; i++) { referenced.objectSubId = columns[i]; + + if (!locked_object) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, RelationGetRelid(rel)); + locked_object = true; + } recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_NORMAL); } } @@ -1255,9 +1277,12 @@ TriggerSetParentTrigger(Relation trigRel, ObjectAddressSet(depender, TriggerRelationId, childTrigId); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, TriggerRelationId, parentTrigId); + LockNotPinnedObject(TriggerRelationId, parentTrigId); recordDependencyOn(&depender, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_PRI); ObjectAddressSet(referenced, RelationRelationId, childTableId); + + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, childTableId); recordDependencyOn(&depender, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_PARTITION_SEC); } else diff --git a/src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c b/src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c index b7b5019f1e..1b90e187ea 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/tsearchcmds.c @@ -214,6 +214,7 @@ DefineTSParser(List *names, List *parameters) namestrcpy(&pname, prsname); values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsname - 1] = NameGetDatum(&pname); values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsnamespace - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(namespaceoid); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); /* * loop over the definition list and extract the information we need. @@ -224,28 +225,48 @@ DefineTSParser(List *names, List *parameters) if (strcmp(defel->defname, "start") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsstart - 1] = get_ts_parser_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsstart); + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsstart - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "gettoken") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prstoken - 1] = get_ts_parser_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_parser_prstoken); + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prstoken - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "end") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsend - 1] = get_ts_parser_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsend); + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsend - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "headline") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsheadline - 1] = get_ts_parser_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsheadline); + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prsheadline - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "lextypes") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prslextype - 1] = get_ts_parser_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_parser_prslextype); + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_parser_prslextype - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else ereport(ERROR, @@ -474,6 +495,10 @@ DefineTSDictionary(List *names, List *parameters) CatalogTupleInsert(dictRel, tup); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); + LockNotPinnedObject(TSTemplateRelationId, templId); + address = makeDictionaryDependencies(tup); /* Post creation hook for new text search dictionary */ @@ -723,6 +748,7 @@ DefineTSTemplate(List *names, List *parameters) namestrcpy(&dname, tmplname); values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplname - 1] = NameGetDatum(&dname); values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplnamespace - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(namespaceoid); + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); /* * loop over the definition list and extract the information we need. @@ -733,15 +759,23 @@ DefineTSTemplate(List *names, List *parameters) if (strcmp(defel->defname, "init") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplinit - 1] = get_ts_template_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplinit); nulls[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplinit - 1] = false; + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmplinit - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else if (strcmp(defel->defname, "lexize") == 0) { + Oid procoid; + values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmpllexize - 1] = get_ts_template_func(defel, Anum_pg_ts_template_tmpllexize); nulls[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmpllexize - 1] = false; + procoid = DatumGetObjectId(values[Anum_pg_ts_template_tmpllexize - 1]); + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, procoid); } else ereport(ERROR, @@ -998,6 +1032,10 @@ DefineTSConfiguration(List *names, List *parameters, ObjectAddress *copied) values[Anum_pg_ts_config_cfgowner - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(GetUserId()); values[Anum_pg_ts_config_cfgparser - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(prsOid); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, namespaceoid); + LockNotPinnedObject(TSParserRelationId, prsOid); + tup = heap_form_tuple(cfgRel->rd_att, values, nulls); CatalogTupleInsert(cfgRel, tup); @@ -1063,6 +1101,7 @@ DefineTSConfiguration(List *names, List *parameters, ObjectAddress *copied) slot[slot_stored_count]->tts_values[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapseqno - 1] = cfgmap->mapseqno; slot[slot_stored_count]->tts_values[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapdict - 1] = cfgmap->mapdict; + LockNotPinnedObject(TSDictionaryRelationId, cfgmap->mapdict); ExecStoreVirtualTuple(slot[slot_stored_count]); slot_stored_count++; @@ -1156,9 +1195,13 @@ ObjectAddress AlterTSConfiguration(AlterTSConfigurationStmt *stmt) { HeapTuple tup; + Form_pg_ts_config cfg; Oid cfgId; Relation relMap; ObjectAddress address; + ScanKeyData skey; + SysScanDesc scan; + HeapTuple maptup; /* Find the configuration */ tup = GetTSConfigTuple(stmt->cfgname); @@ -1168,7 +1211,8 @@ AlterTSConfiguration(AlterTSConfigurationStmt *stmt) errmsg("text search configuration \"%s\" does not exist", NameListToString(stmt->cfgname)))); - cfgId = ((Form_pg_ts_config) GETSTRUCT(tup))->oid; + cfg = (Form_pg_ts_config) GETSTRUCT(tup); + cfgId = cfg->oid; /* must be owner */ if (!object_ownercheck(TSConfigRelationId, cfgId, GetUserId())) @@ -1183,6 +1227,28 @@ AlterTSConfiguration(AlterTSConfigurationStmt *stmt) else if (stmt->tokentype) DropConfigurationMapping(stmt, tup, relMap); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + + ScanKeyInit(&skey, + Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapcfg, + BTEqualStrategyNumber, F_OIDEQ, + ObjectIdGetDatum(cfgId)); + + scan = systable_beginscan(relMap, TSConfigMapIndexId, true, + NULL, 1, &skey); + + while (HeapTupleIsValid((maptup = systable_getnext(scan)))) + { + Form_pg_ts_config_map cfgmap = (Form_pg_ts_config_map) GETSTRUCT(maptup); + + LockNotPinnedObject(TSDictionaryRelationId, cfgmap->mapdict); + } + + systable_endscan(scan); + + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, cfg->cfgnamespace); + LockNotPinnedObject(TSParserRelationId, cfg->cfgparser); + /* Update dependencies */ makeConfigurationDependencies(tup, true, relMap); @@ -1414,6 +1480,8 @@ MakeConfigurationMapping(AlterTSConfigurationStmt *stmt, repl_val[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapdict - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(dictNew); repl_repl[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapdict - 1] = true; + LockNotPinnedObject(TSDictionaryRelationId, dictNew); + newtup = heap_modify_tuple(maptup, RelationGetDescr(relMap), repl_val, repl_null, repl_repl); @@ -1456,6 +1524,9 @@ MakeConfigurationMapping(AlterTSConfigurationStmt *stmt, slot[slotCount]->tts_values[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapseqno - 1] = Int32GetDatum(j + 1); slot[slotCount]->tts_values[Anum_pg_ts_config_map_mapdict - 1] = ObjectIdGetDatum(dictIds[j]); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TSDictionaryRelationId, dictIds[j]); + ExecStoreVirtualTuple(slot[slotCount]); slotCount++; diff --git a/src/backend/commands/typecmds.c b/src/backend/commands/typecmds.c index 2a1e713335..9febaa24a7 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/typecmds.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/typecmds.c @@ -1794,6 +1794,7 @@ makeRangeConstructors(const char *name, Oid namespace, * that they go away silently when the type is dropped. Note that * pg_dump depends on this choice to avoid dumping the constructors. */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, rangeOid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); } } @@ -1859,6 +1860,7 @@ makeMultirangeConstructors(const char *name, Oid namespace, * that they go away silently when the type is dropped. Note that pg_dump * depends on this choice to avoid dumping the constructors. */ + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, multirangeOid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL); pfree(argtypes); @@ -2672,6 +2674,45 @@ AlterDomainDefault(List *names, Node *defaultRaw) CatalogTupleUpdate(rel, &tup->t_self, newtuple); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + typTup = (Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(newtuple); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typnamespace)) + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, typTup->typnamespace); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typinput)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typinput); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typoutput)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typoutput); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typreceive)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typreceive); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typsend)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typsend); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typmodin)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typmodin); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typmodout)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typmodout); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typanalyze)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typanalyze); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typsubscript)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typTup->typsubscript); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typbasetype)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typTup->typbasetype); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typcollation)) + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, typTup->typcollation); + + if (OidIsValid(typTup->typelem)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typTup->typelem); + /* Rebuild dependencies */ GenerateTypeDependencies(newtuple, rel, @@ -4276,10 +4317,13 @@ AlterTypeNamespaceInternal(Oid typeOid, Oid nspOid, if (oldNspOid != nspOid && (isCompositeType || typform->typtype != TYPTYPE_COMPOSITE) && !isImplicitArray) + { + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, nspOid); if (changeDependencyFor(TypeRelationId, typeOid, NamespaceRelationId, oldNspOid, nspOid) != 1) elog(ERROR, "could not change schema dependency for type \"%s\"", format_type_be(typeOid)); + } InvokeObjectPostAlterHook(TypeRelationId, typeOid, 0); @@ -4571,6 +4615,7 @@ AlterTypeRecurse(Oid typeOid, bool isImplicitArray, SysScanDesc scan; ScanKeyData key[1]; HeapTuple domainTup; + Form_pg_type typeForm; /* Since this function recurses, it could be driven to stack overflow */ check_stack_depth(); @@ -4619,6 +4664,45 @@ AlterTypeRecurse(Oid typeOid, bool isImplicitArray, newtup = heap_modify_tuple(tup, RelationGetDescr(catalog), values, nulls, replaces); + /* Lock dependent objects */ + typeForm = (Form_pg_type) GETSTRUCT(newtup); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typnamespace)) + LockNotPinnedObject(NamespaceRelationId, typeForm->typnamespace); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typinput)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typinput); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typoutput)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typoutput); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typreceive)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typreceive); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typsend)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typsend); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typmodin)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typmodin); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typmodout)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typmodout); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typanalyze)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typanalyze); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typsubscript)) + LockNotPinnedObject(ProcedureRelationId, typeForm->typsubscript); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typbasetype)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeForm->typbasetype); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typcollation)) + LockNotPinnedObject(CollationRelationId, typeForm->typcollation); + + if (OidIsValid(typeForm->typelem)) + LockNotPinnedObject(TypeRelationId, typeForm->typelem); + CatalogTupleUpdate(catalog, &newtup->t_self, newtup); /* Rebuild dependencies for this type */ diff --git a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c index 6cc9a8d8bf..c930eca262 100644 --- a/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c +++ b/src/backend/rewrite/rewriteDefine.c @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ InsertRule(const char *rulname, referenced.objectId = eventrel_oid; referenced.objectSubId = 0; + LockNotPinnedObject(RelationRelationId, eventrel_oid); recordDependencyOn(&myself, &referenced, (evtype == CMD_SELECT) ? DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL : DEPENDENCY_AUTO); diff --git a/src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt b/src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt index 3250d539e1..60e8539fe3 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt +++ b/src/backend/utils/errcodes.txt @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ Section: Class 28 - Invalid Authorization Specification Section: Class 2B - Dependent Privilege Descriptors Still Exist 2B000 E ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_PRIVILEGE_DESCRIPTORS_STILL_EXIST dependent_privilege_descriptors_still_exist +2BP02 E ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_DOES_NOT_EXIST dependent_objects_does_not_exist 2BP01 E ERRCODE_DEPENDENT_OBJECTS_STILL_EXIST dependent_objects_still_exist Section: Class 2D - Invalid Transaction Termination diff --git a/src/include/catalog/dependency.h b/src/include/catalog/dependency.h index 6908ca7180..0546bcbe16 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/dependency.h +++ b/src/include/catalog/dependency.h @@ -101,6 +101,8 @@ typedef struct ObjectAddresses ObjectAddresses; /* in dependency.c */ extern void AcquireDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object, int flags); +extern void LockNotPinnedObjectById(const ObjectAddress *object); +extern void LockNotPinnedObject(Oid classid, Oid objid); extern void ReleaseDeletionLock(const ObjectAddress *object); @@ -172,6 +174,7 @@ extern long changeDependenciesOf(Oid classId, Oid oldObjectId, extern long changeDependenciesOn(Oid refClassId, Oid oldRefObjectId, Oid newRefObjectId); +extern bool isObjectPinned(const ObjectAddress *object); extern Oid getExtensionOfObject(Oid classId, Oid objectId); extern List *getAutoExtensionsOfObject(Oid classId, Oid objectId); diff --git a/src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h b/src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h index 3a70d80e32..56f746264b 100644 --- a/src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h +++ b/src/include/catalog/objectaddress.h @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ extern void check_object_ownership(Oid roleid, Node *object, Relation relation); extern Oid get_object_namespace(const ObjectAddress *address); +extern bool ObjectByIdExist(const ObjectAddress *address); extern bool is_objectclass_supported(Oid class_id); extern const char *get_object_class_descr(Oid class_id); diff --git a/src/test/isolation/expected/test_dependencies_locks.out b/src/test/isolation/expected/test_dependencies_locks.out new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..9b645d7aa5 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/isolation/expected/test_dependencies_locks.out @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@ +Parsed test spec with 2 sessions + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_function_in_schema s2_drop_schema s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_function_in_schema: CREATE FUNCTION testschema.foo() RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; +step s2_drop_schema: DROP SCHEMA testschema; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_schema: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop schema testschema because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_schema s1_create_function_in_schema s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_schema: DROP SCHEMA testschema; +step s1_create_function_in_schema: CREATE FUNCTION testschema.foo() RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_function_in_schema: <... completed> +ERROR: schema testschema does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_alter_function_schema s2_drop_alterschema s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_alter_function_schema: ALTER FUNCTION public.falter() SET SCHEMA alterschema; +step s2_drop_alterschema: DROP SCHEMA alterschema; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_alterschema: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop schema alterschema because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_alterschema s1_alter_function_schema s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_alterschema: DROP SCHEMA alterschema; +step s1_alter_function_schema: ALTER FUNCTION public.falter() SET SCHEMA alterschema; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_alter_function_schema: <... completed> +ERROR: schema alterschema does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_function_with_argtype s2_drop_foo_type s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_function_with_argtype: CREATE FUNCTION fooargtype(num foo) RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; +step s2_drop_foo_type: DROP TYPE public.foo; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_foo_type: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop type foo because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_foo_type s1_create_function_with_argtype s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_foo_type: DROP TYPE public.foo; +step s1_create_function_with_argtype: CREATE FUNCTION fooargtype(num foo) RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_function_with_argtype: <... completed> +ERROR: type foo does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_function_with_rettype s2_drop_foo_rettype s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_function_with_rettype: CREATE FUNCTION footrettype() RETURNS id LANGUAGE sql RETURN 1; +step s2_drop_foo_rettype: DROP DOMAIN id; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_foo_rettype: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop type id because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_foo_rettype s1_create_function_with_rettype s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_foo_rettype: DROP DOMAIN id; +step s1_create_function_with_rettype: CREATE FUNCTION footrettype() RETURNS id LANGUAGE sql RETURN 1; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_function_with_rettype: <... completed> +ERROR: type id does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_function_with_function s2_drop_function_f s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_function_with_function: CREATE FUNCTION foofunc() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL RETURN f() + 1; +step s2_drop_function_f: DROP FUNCTION f(); <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_function_f: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop function f() because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_function_f s1_create_function_with_function s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_function_f: DROP FUNCTION f(); +step s1_create_function_with_function: CREATE FUNCTION foofunc() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL RETURN f() + 1; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_function_with_function: <... completed> +ERROR: function f() does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_domain_with_domain s2_drop_domain_id s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_domain_with_domain: CREATE DOMAIN idid as id; +step s2_drop_domain_id: DROP DOMAIN id; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_domain_id: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop type id because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_domain_id s1_create_domain_with_domain s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_domain_id: DROP DOMAIN id; +step s1_create_domain_with_domain: CREATE DOMAIN idid as id; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_domain_with_domain: <... completed> +ERROR: type id does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_table_with_type s2_drop_footab_type s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_table_with_type: CREATE TABLE tabtype(a footab); +step s2_drop_footab_type: DROP TYPE public.footab; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_footab_type: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop type footab because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_footab_type s1_create_table_with_type s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_footab_type: DROP TYPE public.footab; +step s1_create_table_with_type: CREATE TABLE tabtype(a footab); <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_table_with_type: <... completed> +ERROR: type footab does not exist + +starting permutation: s1_begin s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper s2_drop_fdw_wrapper s1_commit +step s1_begin: BEGIN; +step s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper: CREATE SERVER srv_fdw_wrapper FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper; +step s2_drop_fdw_wrapper: DROP FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper RESTRICT; <waiting ...> +step s1_commit: COMMIT; +step s2_drop_fdw_wrapper: <... completed> +ERROR: cannot drop foreign-data wrapper fdw_wrapper because other objects depend on it + +starting permutation: s2_begin s2_drop_fdw_wrapper s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper s2_commit +step s2_begin: BEGIN; +step s2_drop_fdw_wrapper: DROP FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper RESTRICT; +step s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper: CREATE SERVER srv_fdw_wrapper FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper; <waiting ...> +step s2_commit: COMMIT; +step s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper: <... completed> +ERROR: foreign-data wrapper fdw_wrapper does not exist diff --git a/src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule b/src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule index 6da98cffac..ef6a7075bc 100644 --- a/src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule +++ b/src/test/isolation/isolation_schedule @@ -117,3 +117,4 @@ test: serializable-parallel-2 test: serializable-parallel-3 test: matview-write-skew test: lock-nowait +test: test_dependencies_locks diff --git a/src/test/isolation/specs/test_dependencies_locks.spec b/src/test/isolation/specs/test_dependencies_locks.spec new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..5d04dfe9dc --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/isolation/specs/test_dependencies_locks.spec @@ -0,0 +1,89 @@ +setup +{ + CREATE SCHEMA testschema; + CREATE SCHEMA alterschema; + CREATE TYPE public.foo as enum ('one', 'two'); + CREATE TYPE public.footab as enum ('three', 'four'); + CREATE DOMAIN id AS int; + CREATE FUNCTION f() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL RETURN 1; + CREATE FUNCTION public.falter() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL RETURN 1; + CREATE FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper; +} + +teardown +{ + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS testschema.foo(); + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS fooargtype(num foo); + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS footrettype(); + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS foofunc(); + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS public.falter(); + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS alterschema.falter(); + DROP DOMAIN IF EXISTS idid; + DROP SERVER IF EXISTS srv_fdw_wrapper; + DROP TABLE IF EXISTS tabtype; + DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS testschema; + DROP SCHEMA IF EXISTS alterschema; + DROP TYPE IF EXISTS public.foo; + DROP TYPE IF EXISTS public.footab; + DROP DOMAIN IF EXISTS id; + DROP FUNCTION IF EXISTS f(); + DROP FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER IF EXISTS fdw_wrapper; +} + +session "s1" + +step "s1_begin" { BEGIN; } +step "s1_create_function_in_schema" { CREATE FUNCTION testschema.foo() RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; } +step "s1_create_function_with_argtype" { CREATE FUNCTION fooargtype(num foo) RETURNS int AS 'select 1' LANGUAGE sql; } +step "s1_create_function_with_rettype" { CREATE FUNCTION footrettype() RETURNS id LANGUAGE sql RETURN 1; } +step "s1_create_function_with_function" { CREATE FUNCTION foofunc() RETURNS int LANGUAGE SQL RETURN f() + 1; } +step "s1_alter_function_schema" { ALTER FUNCTION public.falter() SET SCHEMA alterschema; } +step "s1_create_domain_with_domain" { CREATE DOMAIN idid as id; } +step "s1_create_table_with_type" { CREATE TABLE tabtype(a footab); } +step "s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper" { CREATE SERVER srv_fdw_wrapper FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper; } +step "s1_commit" { COMMIT; } + +session "s2" + +step "s2_begin" { BEGIN; } +step "s2_drop_schema" { DROP SCHEMA testschema; } +step "s2_drop_alterschema" { DROP SCHEMA alterschema; } +step "s2_drop_foo_type" { DROP TYPE public.foo; } +step "s2_drop_foo_rettype" { DROP DOMAIN id; } +step "s2_drop_footab_type" { DROP TYPE public.footab; } +step "s2_drop_function_f" { DROP FUNCTION f(); } +step "s2_drop_domain_id" { DROP DOMAIN id; } +step "s2_drop_fdw_wrapper" { DROP FOREIGN DATA WRAPPER fdw_wrapper RESTRICT; } +step "s2_commit" { COMMIT; } + +# function - schema +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_function_in_schema" "s2_drop_schema" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_schema" "s1_create_function_in_schema" "s2_commit" + +# alter function - schema +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_alter_function_schema" "s2_drop_alterschema" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_alterschema" "s1_alter_function_schema" "s2_commit" + +# function - argtype +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_function_with_argtype" "s2_drop_foo_type" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_foo_type" "s1_create_function_with_argtype" "s2_commit" + +# function - rettype +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_function_with_rettype" "s2_drop_foo_rettype" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_foo_rettype" "s1_create_function_with_rettype" "s2_commit" + +# function - function +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_function_with_function" "s2_drop_function_f" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_function_f" "s1_create_function_with_function" "s2_commit" + +# domain - domain +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_domain_with_domain" "s2_drop_domain_id" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_domain_id" "s1_create_domain_with_domain" "s2_commit" + +# table - type +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_table_with_type" "s2_drop_footab_type" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_footab_type" "s1_create_table_with_type" "s2_commit" + +# server - foreign data wrapper +permutation "s1_begin" "s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper" "s2_drop_fdw_wrapper" "s1_commit" +permutation "s2_begin" "s2_drop_fdw_wrapper" "s1_create_server_with_fdw_wrapper" "s2_commit" diff --git a/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out b/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out index 8cbacca2c9..df8d276dfc 100644 --- a/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out +++ b/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/alter_table.out @@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished create (subId=0x0) [internal] +NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] +NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] NOTICE: in process utility: superuser finished CREATE TABLE CREATE RULE test_oat_notify AS ON UPDATE TO test_oat_schema.test_oat_tab @@ -62,8 +64,6 @@ BEGIN END IF; END; $$; NOTICE: in process utility: superuser attempting CREATE FUNCTION -NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] -NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting create (subId=0x0) [explicit] NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished create (subId=0x0) [explicit] NOTICE: in process utility: superuser finished CREATE FUNCTION diff --git a/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/test_oat_hooks.out b/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/test_oat_hooks.out index effdc49145..da6d931994 100644 --- a/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/test_oat_hooks.out +++ b/src/test/modules/test_oat_hooks/expected/test_oat_hooks.out @@ -86,6 +86,8 @@ NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting create (subId=0x0) [internal] NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished create (subId=0x0) [internal] +NOTICE: in object access: superuser attempting namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] +NOTICE: in object access: superuser finished namespace search (subId=0x0) [no report on violation, allowed] NOTICE: in process utility: superuser finished CREATE TABLE CREATE INDEX regress_test_table_t_idx ON regress_test_table (t); NOTICE: in process utility: superuser attempting CREATE INDEX diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out b/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out index 673361e840..c2115ea601 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/alter_table.out @@ -2867,11 +2867,12 @@ begin; alter table alterlock2 add constraint alterlock2nv foreign key (f1) references alterlock (f1) NOT VALID; select * from my_locks order by 1; - relname | max_lockmode -------------+----------------------- - alterlock | ShareRowExclusiveLock - alterlock2 | ShareRowExclusiveLock -(2 rows) + relname | max_lockmode +----------------+----------------------- + alterlock | ShareRowExclusiveLock + alterlock2 | ShareRowExclusiveLock + alterlock_pkey | AccessShareLock +(3 rows) commit; begin; -- 2.34.1 --Bj+x/cSHj0rO0bhZ-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 327+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 327+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-20 07:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 327+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2024-03-29 15:43 [PATCH v15] Avoid orphaned objects dependencies Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox