agora inbox for pgsql-hackers@postgresql.orghelp / color / mirror / Atom feed
[PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. 402+ messages / 3 participants [nested] [flat]
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 +++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 51 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 378 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 167 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 808 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..3ae25f3444 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -489,12 +491,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids child_relids, Relids top_parent_relids) { - AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; - int nappinfos; - int cnt; - - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; + int nappinfos; + int cnt; appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,8 +571,9 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; - Relids tmp_result = NULL; + Relids tmp_result = relids; int cnt; /* @@ -579,12 +586,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -592,13 +604,15 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, tmp_result = adjust_child_relids_multilevel(root, relids, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); - relids = tmp_result; } - result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); + result = adjust_child_relids(tmp_result, nappinfos, appinfos); - /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) + /* + * Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. If recursive pass did't + * replace any relids, tmp_result point to the original set, not a copy. + */ + if (tmp_result != relids) bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); pfree(appinfos); @@ -715,11 +729,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +741,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..327505676c 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,384 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.29..33230.19 rows=33 width=8) + -> Append (cost=0.00..33008.08 rows=67 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16604.25 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 (cost=0.00..78.19 rows=5019 width=4) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..3.75 rows=1 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=4) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Nested Loop (cost=0.00..16399.75 rows=33 width=8) + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small (cost=0.00..2.00 rows=100 width=8) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 (cost=0.00..76.81 rows=4981 width=4) + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big (cost=0.29..3.31 rows=1 width=5) + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..364b3216f8 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,173 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when required_outer set contains relid of plain +-- relation entry, not 'other' entry. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +EXPLAIN +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------3592BFA68FFAC61CCE0AF115-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. Disallow asymmetric machinery for joining of two partitioned (or appended) relations because it could cause huge consumption of CPU and memory during reparameterization of NestLoop path. Change logic of the multilevel child relids adjustment, because this feature allows the optimizer to plan in new way. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 187 ++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c | 17 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 44 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 19 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 425 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 180 ++++++++ 9 files changed, 867 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index 6407ede12a..32618ebbd5 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 8b69870cf4..9453258f83 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1552,6 +1553,192 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs is impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_joinrelids; + Relids parent_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_joinrel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + + child_joinrelids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); + parent_relids = bms_union(append_path->path.parent->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + child_joinrelids, parent_relids); + + child_joinrel = find_join_rel(root, child_joinrelids); + if (!child_joinrel) + child_joinrel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + else + { + /* + * The join relation already exists. For example, it could happen if + * we join two plane tables with partitioned table(s). + * Populating this join with additional paths could push out some + * previously added paths which could be pointed in a subplans list + * of an higher level append. + * Of course, we could save such paths before generating new. But it + * can increase too much the number of paths in complex queries. It + * can be a task for future work. + */ + return NIL; + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_joinrel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_joinrel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_joinrel); + result = lappend(result, child_joinrel); + } + return result; +} + +static bool +is_asymmetric_join_feasible(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return false; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return false; + + /* Disallow recursive usage of asymmertic join machinery */ + if (root->join_rel_level == NULL) + return false; + + /* + * Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two append subplans. + * In the case of a parameterized NL join, a reparameterization procedure + * will lead to large memory allocations and a CPU consumption: + * each reparameterization will induce subpath duplication, creating new + * ParamPathInfo instance and increasing of ppilist up to number of + * partitions in the inner. Also, if we have many partitions, each bitmapset + * variable will be large and many leaks of such variable (caused by relid + * replacement) will highly increase memory consumption. + * So, we deny such paths for now. + */ + foreach(lc, inner_rel->pathlist) + { + if (IsA(lfirst(lc), AppendPath)) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + /* + * Try this kind of paths if we allow complex partitionwise joins and we know + * we can build this join safely. + */ + if (!enable_partitionwise_join || + !is_asymmetric_join_feasible(root, outer_rel, inner_rel, jointype)) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. Asymmetric join isn't needed if the append node + * has only one child. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath) && + list_length(append_path->subpaths) > 1) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_FINALLY(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + } + PG_END_TRY(); + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + { + /* + * Add new append relation. We must choose cheapest paths after + * this operation because the pathlist possibly contains + * joinrels and appendrels that can be suboptimal. + */ + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + set_cheapest(joinrel); + } + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c index e50624c465..fccc0685d7 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/setrefs.c @@ -281,24 +281,29 @@ set_plan_references(PlannerInfo *root, Plan *plan) /* * Adjust RT indexes of AppendRelInfos and add to final appendrels list. - * We assume the AppendRelInfos were built during planning and don't need - * to be copied. + * The AppendRelInfos are copied, because as a part of a subplan they could + * be visited many times in the case of asymmetric join. */ foreach(lc, root->append_rel_list) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = lfirst_node(AppendRelInfo, lc); + AppendRelInfo *newappinfo; + + /* flat copy is enough since all valuable fields are scalars */ + newappinfo = (AppendRelInfo *) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); + memcpy(newappinfo, appinfo, sizeof(AppendRelInfo)); /* adjust RT indexes */ - appinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; - appinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->parent_relid += rtoffset; + newappinfo->child_relid += rtoffset; /* * Rather than adjust the translated_vars entries, just drop 'em. * Neither the executor nor EXPLAIN currently need that data. */ - appinfo->translated_vars = NIL; + newappinfo->translated_vars = NIL; - glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, appinfo); + glob->appendRelations = lappend(glob->appendRelations, newappinfo); } /* Now fix the Plan tree */ diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..f4d12f76e1 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -490,12 +492,10 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, Relids top_parent_relids) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; - Bitmapset *parent_relids = NULL; + Relids parent_relids = NULL; int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -515,12 +520,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, node = adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, node, nappinfos, appinfos); pfree(appinfos); + pfree(parent_relids); return node; } /* - * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of + * Substitute child relids for parent relids in a Relid set. The array of * appinfos specifies the substitutions to be performed. */ Relids @@ -565,6 +571,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,13 +586,24 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + if (bms_is_subset(relids, normal_relids)) + { + /* Nothing to do. Parameters set points to plain relations only. */ + result = relids; + goto cleanup; + } + + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) { @@ -597,10 +615,11 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, result = adjust_child_relids(relids, nappinfos, appinfos); +cleanup: /* Free memory consumed by any intermediate result. */ - if (tmp_result) - bms_free(tmp_result); + bms_free(tmp_result); bms_free(parent_relids); + bms_free(normal_relids); pfree(appinfos); return result; @@ -715,11 +734,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +746,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index cedb3848dd..17e215b72d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4225,7 +4225,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index 47769cea45..ddf0f5a876 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -792,11 +792,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -854,8 +851,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); @@ -2036,9 +2036,8 @@ build_child_join_reltarget(PlannerInfo *root, { /* Build the targetlist */ childrel->reltarget->exprs = (List *) - adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, - (Node *) parentrel->reltarget->exprs, - nappinfos, appinfos); + adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, (Node *)parentrel->reltarget->exprs, + childrel->relids, parentrel->relids); /* Set the cost and width fields */ childrel->reltarget->cost.startup = parentrel->reltarget->cost.startup; diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index f1d111063c..a0106dc539 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..3eddd9bec3 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,431 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p0.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_p2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = prt6.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(13 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 4000 +(1 row) + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_2 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_4 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_5 + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = sq1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Subquery Scan on sq1 + Filter: (sq1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Limit + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p0 prt6_7 + -> Seq Scan on prt6_p1 prt6_8 +(32 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + count +------- + 2000 +(1 row) + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------ + Aggregate + -> Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) +(35 rows) + +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + count +------- + 11000 +(1 row) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Index Only Scan using big_x_idx on big + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) +(16 rows) + +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + x | y +---+--- +(0 rows) + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Nested Loop Left Join + -> Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_1.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_1.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part0_l2 part_l0_1 + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_2.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_2.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on part1_l2 part_l0_2 + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((small.y = part_l0_3.y) AND ((small.y + part_l0_3.y) < 10)) + -> Seq Scan on small + -> Seq Scan on part1_l1 part_l0_3 + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on big + Recheck Cond: ((x = (small.x)::numeric) OR (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric)) + -> BitmapOr + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (small.x)::numeric) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on big_x_idx + Index Cond: (x = (part_l0.x)::numeric) +(22 rows) + +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + count +------- + 0 +(1 row) + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..4d1dd5bec1 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,186 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE prt6 (aid int, alabel text) PARTITION BY HASH(aid); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p0 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt6_p1 PARTITION OF prt6 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (x % 1000)::int, + ((x+1) % 1000)::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 1500) x); +INSERT INTO prt6 (SELECT * FROM t5_1); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5,prt6,t5_1,t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; + +-- Trivial asymmetric JOIN of partitioned table with a relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- The same, but appended with UNION ALL +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM ( + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p0) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p1) + UNION ALL + (SELECT * FROM prt5_p2) + ) AS sq1 +JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Don't allow asymmetric JOIN of two partitioned tables. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN prt6 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Check asymmetric JOIN with Subquery +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN ( + SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000 +) AS sq1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT count(*) FROM prt5 JOIN (SELECT * FROM prt6 LIMIT 1000) AS sq1 + ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- Asymmetric JOIN of two plane tables and one partitioned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT count(*) + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = on; + +-- Check reparameterization code when an optimizer have to make two level relids +-- adjustment. + +SET enable_hashjoin = 'off'; +SET enable_mergejoin = 'off'; +SET enable_material = 'off'; + +CREATE TABLE big AS SELECT x AS x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x; +CREATE INDEX ON big(x); +CREATE TABLE small AS SELECT x, -x AS y FROM generate_series(1,100) x; + +CREATE TABLE part_l0 (x int, y int, z int) PARTITION BY HASH (y); +CREATE TABLE part0_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0) PARTITION BY HASH (z); +CREATE TABLE part0_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE part1_l2 PARTITION OF part0_l1 (z) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE part1_l1 PARTITION OF part_l0 (y) + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO part_l0 (x, y, z) (SELECT x,x,x FROM generate_series(1,1E4) x); + +ANALYZE big,small,part_l0; + +-- Parameter have to be reparameterized by a plane relation. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; +SELECT small.* FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x; + +-- Parameters have to be reparameterized by plane and partitioned relations. +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; +SELECT count(*) FROM small + JOIN part_l0 ON small.y = part_l0.y AND small.y + part_l0.y < 10 + LEFT JOIN big ON big.x = small.x OR big.x = part_l0.x; + +DROP TABLE IF EXISTS big,small,part_l0 CASCADE; +RESET enable_hashjoin; +RESET enable_mergejoin; +RESET enable_material; +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.33.0 --------------9DCA5E9A07F91111D4169DAB-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. @ 2021-04-02 06:02 Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Andrey Lepikhov @ 2021-04-02 06:02 UTC (permalink / raw) Teach optimizer to consider partitionwise join of non-partitioned table with each partition of partitioned table. This technique cause changes of 'reparameterize by child' machinery. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c | 9 + src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c | 151 ++++++++++++++ src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c | 28 ++- src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c | 9 +- src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c | 14 +- src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 7 +- src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out | 209 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql | 99 +++++++++ 8 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c index e9b6968b1d..6ba6d32ae4 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinpath.c @@ -335,6 +335,15 @@ add_paths_to_joinrel(PlannerInfo *root, if (set_join_pathlist_hook) set_join_pathlist_hook(root, joinrel, outerrel, innerrel, jointype, &extra); + + /* + * 7. If outer relation is delivered from partition-tables, consider + * distributing inner relation to every partition-leaf prior to + * append these leafs. + */ + try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(root, joinrel, + outerrel, innerrel, + jointype, &extra); } /* diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c index 0dbe2ac726..6f900475bb 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/joinrels.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include "miscadmin.h" #include "optimizer/appendinfo.h" +#include "optimizer/cost.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" #include "optimizer/pathnode.h" #include "optimizer/paths.h" @@ -1551,6 +1552,156 @@ try_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel1, RelOptInfo *rel2, } } +/* + * Build RelOptInfo on JOIN of each partition of the outer relation and the inner + * relation. Return List of such RelOptInfo's. Return NIL, if at least one of + * these JOINs are impossible to build. + */ +static List * +extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + AppendPath *append_path, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + List *result = NIL; + ListCell *lc; + + foreach (lc, append_path->subpaths) + { + Path *child_path = lfirst(lc); + RelOptInfo *child_rel = child_path->parent; + Relids child_join_relids; + RelOptInfo *child_join_rel; + SpecialJoinInfo *child_sjinfo; + List *child_restrictlist; + AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nappinfos; + + child_join_relids = bms_union(child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_join_relids, + &nappinfos); + child_sjinfo = build_child_join_sjinfo(root, extra->sjinfo, + child_rel->relids, + inner_rel->relids); + child_restrictlist = (List *) + adjust_appendrel_attrs(root, (Node *)extra->restrictlist, + nappinfos, appinfos); + pfree(appinfos); + + child_join_rel = find_join_rel(root, child_join_relids); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + child_join_rel = build_child_join_rel(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + joinrel, + child_restrictlist, + child_sjinfo, + jointype); + if (!child_join_rel) + { + /* + * If can't build JOIN between inner relation and one of the outer + * partitions - return immediately. + */ + return NIL; + } + } + else + { + /* + * TODO: + * Can't imagine situation when join relation already exists. But in + * the 'partition_join' regression test it happens. + * It may be an indicator of possible problems. + */ + } + + populate_joinrel_with_paths(root, + child_rel, + inner_rel, + child_join_rel, + child_sjinfo, + child_restrictlist); + + /* Give up if asymmetric partition-wise join is not available */ + if (child_join_rel->pathlist == NIL) + return NIL; + + set_cheapest(child_join_rel); + result = lappend(result, child_join_rel); + } + return result; +} + +void +try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + if (!enable_partitionwise_join) + return; + + if (IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)) + return; + + if (jointype != JOIN_INNER && jointype != JOIN_LEFT) + return; + + foreach (lc, outer_rel->pathlist) + { + AppendPath *append_path = lfirst(lc); + + /* + * MEMO: We assume this pathlist keeps at least one AppendPath that + * represents partitioned table-scan, symmetric or asymmetric + * partition-wise join. It is not correct right now, however, a hook + * on add_path() to give additional decision for path removel allows + * to retain this kind of AppendPath, regardless of its cost. + */ + if (IsA(append_path, AppendPath)) + { + List **join_rel_level_saved; + List *live_childrels = NIL; + + join_rel_level_saved = root->join_rel_level; + PG_TRY(); + { + /* temporary disables "dynamic programming" algorithm */ + root->join_rel_level = NULL; + + live_childrels = + extract_asymmetric_partitionwise_subjoin(root, + joinrel, + append_path, + inner_rel, + jointype, + extra); + } + PG_CATCH(); + { + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + PG_RE_THROW(); + } + PG_END_TRY(); + root->join_rel_level = join_rel_level_saved; + + if (live_childrels != NIL) + add_paths_to_append_rel(root, joinrel, live_childrels); + + break; + } + } +} + /* * Construct the SpecialJoinInfo for a child-join by translating * SpecialJoinInfo for the join between parents. left_relids and right_relids diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c index af46f581ac..be4624b619 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/appendinfo.c @@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos, context.appinfos = appinfos; /* If there's nothing to adjust, don't call this function. */ - Assert(nappinfos >= 1 && appinfos != NULL); + /* If there's nothing to adjust, just return a duplication */ + if (nappinfos == 0) + return copyObject(node); /* Should never be translating a Query tree. */ Assert(node == NULL || !IsA(node, Query)); @@ -494,8 +496,6 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, int nappinfos; int cnt; - Assert(bms_num_members(child_relids) == bms_num_members(top_parent_relids)); - appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of given child. */ @@ -506,8 +506,13 @@ adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Node *node, parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); } - /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ - if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) + /* + * Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. Keep in mind that in a + * case of asymmetric JOIN top_parent_relids can contain relids which aren't + * part of an append node. + */ + if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids) && + !bms_is_subset(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) node = adjust_appendrel_attrs_multilevel(root, node, parent_relids, top_parent_relids); @@ -565,6 +570,7 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; Relids parent_relids = NULL; + Relids normal_relids = NULL; Relids result; Relids tmp_result = NULL; int cnt; @@ -579,12 +585,17 @@ adjust_child_relids_multilevel(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, appinfos = find_appinfos_by_relids(root, child_relids, &nappinfos); /* Construct relids set for the immediate parent of the given child. */ + normal_relids = bms_copy(child_relids); for (cnt = 0; cnt < nappinfos; cnt++) { AppendRelInfo *appinfo = appinfos[cnt]; parent_relids = bms_add_member(parent_relids, appinfo->parent_relid); + normal_relids = bms_del_member(normal_relids, appinfo->child_relid); } + parent_relids = bms_union(parent_relids, normal_relids); + if (normal_relids) + bms_free(normal_relids); /* Recurse if immediate parent is not the top parent. */ if (!bms_equal(parent_relids, top_parent_relids)) @@ -715,11 +726,11 @@ AppendRelInfo ** find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) { AppendRelInfo **appinfos; + int nrooms = bms_num_members(relids); int cnt = 0; int i; - *nappinfos = bms_num_members(relids); - appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * *nappinfos); + appinfos = (AppendRelInfo **) palloc(sizeof(AppendRelInfo *) * nrooms); i = -1; while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) >= 0) @@ -727,10 +738,11 @@ find_appinfos_by_relids(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, int *nappinfos) AppendRelInfo *appinfo = root->append_rel_array[i]; if (!appinfo) - elog(ERROR, "child rel %d not found in append_rel_array", i); + continue; appinfos[cnt++] = appinfo; } + *nappinfos = cnt; return appinfos; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c index b248b038e0..73cfb4748d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c @@ -4209,7 +4209,14 @@ do { \ MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcontext); } - bms_free(required_outer); + + /* + * If adjust_child_relids_multilevel don't do replacements it returns + * the original set, not a copy. It is possible in the case of asymmetric + * JOIN and child_rel->relids contains relids only of plane relations. + */ + if (required_outer != old_ppi->ppi_req_outer) + bms_free(required_outer); new_path->param_info = new_ppi; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c index e105a4d5f1..f98a82e725 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/util/relnode.c @@ -790,11 +790,8 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, AppendRelInfo **appinfos; int nappinfos; - /* Only joins between "other" relations land here. */ - Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) && IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); - - /* The parent joinrel should have consider_partitionwise_join set. */ - Assert(parent_joinrel->consider_partitionwise_join); + /* Either of relations must be "other" relation at least. */ + Assert(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) || IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel)); joinrel->reloptkind = RELOPT_OTHER_JOINREL; joinrel->relids = bms_union(outer_rel->relids, inner_rel->relids); @@ -851,8 +848,11 @@ build_child_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *outer_rel, joinrel->partexprs = NULL; joinrel->nullable_partexprs = NULL; - joinrel->top_parent_relids = bms_union(outer_rel->top_parent_relids, - inner_rel->top_parent_relids); + joinrel->top_parent_relids = + bms_union(IS_OTHER_REL(outer_rel) ? + outer_rel->top_parent_relids : outer_rel->relids, + IS_OTHER_REL(inner_rel) ? + inner_rel->top_parent_relids : inner_rel->relids); /* Compute information relevant to foreign relations. */ set_foreign_rel_properties(joinrel, outer_rel, inner_rel); diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index 035d3e1206..d64aa37f80 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -109,7 +109,12 @@ extern bool have_join_order_restriction(PlannerInfo *root, extern bool have_dangerous_phv(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outer_relids, Relids inner_params); extern void mark_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel); - +extern void try_asymmetric_partitionwise_join(PlannerInfo *root, + RelOptInfo *joinrel, + RelOptInfo *outer_rel, + RelOptInfo *inner_rel, + JoinType jointype, + JoinPathExtraData *extra); /* * equivclass.c * routines for managing EquivalenceClasses diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out index 27f7525b3e..2bc7ad70d9 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/partition_join.out @@ -2320,6 +2320,215 @@ SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = 375 | 0375 | 375 | 0375 (8 rows) +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(19 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------ + Append + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_1.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_2.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Hash Join + Hash Cond: (prt5_3.b = t5_2.bid) + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_2 + Filter: (blabel ~~ '%cd%'::text) + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%ab%'::text) +(34 rows) + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Hash Right Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + Join Filter: (t5_1.alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 +(9 rows) + +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------- + Hash Left Join + Hash Cond: (prt5.a = t5_1.aid) + -> Append + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p0 prt5_1 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p1 prt5_2 + -> Seq Scan on prt5_p2 prt5_3 + -> Hash + -> Seq Scan on t5_1 + Filter: (alabel ~~ '%abc%'::text) +(9 rows) + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel +------+---+---+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + hkey | a | b | aid | alabel | bid | blabel +------+---+---+-----+--------+-----+-------- +(0 rows) + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) +(9 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------- + Append + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_1.id = e_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta1 prta_1 + -> Index Scan using prtb1_id_idx on prtb1 prtb_1 + Index Cond: (id = prta_1.id) + -> Index Scan using e1_id_idx on e1 e_1 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (prta_2.id = e_2.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on prta2 prta_2 + -> Index Scan using prtb2_id_idx on prtb2 prtb_2 + Index Cond: (id = prta_2.id) + -> Index Scan using e2_id_idx on e2 e_2 + Index Cond: (id = prtb_2.id) +(17 rows) + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql index d97b5b69ff..c206fd736a 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/partition_join.sql @@ -536,6 +536,105 @@ EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; SELECT t1.a, t1.c, t2.b, t2.c FROM prt1_adv t1 INNER JOIN prt2_adv t2 ON (t1.a = t2.b) WHERE t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a, t2.b; +-- +-- For asymmetric partition-wise join +-- +CREATE TABLE prt5 (hkey int, a int, b int) PARTITION BY HASH(hkey); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p0 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p1 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 1); +CREATE TABLE prt5_p2 PARTITION OF prt5 + FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 3, remainder 2); +CREATE TABLE t5_1 (aid int, alabel text); +CREATE TABLE t5_2 (bid int, blabel text); + +INSERT INTO prt5 (SELECT x, (1000.0 * random())::int, + (1000.0 * random())::int + FROM generate_series(1,1000000) x); +INSERT INTO t5_1 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); +INSERT INTO t5_2 (SELECT x, md5(x::text) FROM generate_series(-200, 800) x); + +VACUUM ANALYZE prt5; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_1; +VACUUM ANALYZE t5_2; + +SET max_parallel_workers_per_gather = 0; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +-- unable to extract non-partitioned right relation +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 RIGHT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; +-- left side can be extracted, but no cost benefit +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prt5 LEFT JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +-- validation of the results with/without asymmetric partition-wise join +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02a + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SET enable_partitionwise_join = off; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result01b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%abc%'; + +SELECT * INTO pg_temp.result02b + FROM prt5 JOIN t5_1 ON a = aid AND alabel like '%ab%' + JOIN t5_2 ON b = bid AND blabel like '%cd%'; + +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result01b; +SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02a EXCEPT SELECT * FROM pg_temp.result02b; + +RESET max_parallel_workers_per_gather; +SET enable_partitionwise_join = true; + +-- Parameterized path examples. +CREATE TABLE prta (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prta1 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prta2 PARTITION OF prta FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prta2 (id); +INSERT INTO prta (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('abc' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE prtb (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE prtb1 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE prtb2 PARTITION OF prtb FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON prtb2 (id); +INSERT INTO prtb (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('def' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); + +CREATE TABLE e (id integer, payload text) PARTITION BY HASH (id); +CREATE TABLE e1 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 0); +CREATE TABLE e2 PARTITION OF e FOR VALUES WITH (modulus 2, remainder 1); +INSERT INTO e (id, payload) + (SELECT *, ('ghi' || id)::text AS payload + FROM generate_series(1,1000) AS id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e1 (id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON e2 (id); + +ANALYZE prta,prtb,e; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb WHERE prta.id=prtb.id; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM prta,prtb,e WHERE prta.id=prtb.id AND prta.id=e.id; + -- semi join EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) SELECT t1.* FROM prt1_adv t1 WHERE EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM prt2_adv t2 WHERE t1.a = t2.b) AND t1.b = 0 ORDER BY t1.a; -- 2.25.1 --------------8EB2F9A6243C623F4024291E-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/4] JSON_TABLE PLAN DEFAULT clause @ 2021-09-13 22:03 Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Andrew Dunstan @ 2021-09-13 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw) --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 118 ++++++++++++++++--- src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c | 4 + src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c | 3 + src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c | 3 + src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c | 3 + src/backend/parser/gram.y | 41 ++++++- src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c | 13 ++- src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c | 120 +++++++++++++++----- src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c | 9 ++ src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 13 +++ src/include/nodes/primnodes.h | 3 + src/include/parser/kwlist.h | 1 + src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out | 118 +++++++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql | 65 +++++++++++ src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 1 + 15 files changed, 462 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index e86c8992c3..746f24501a 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -19207,6 +19207,10 @@ FROM JSON_TABLE ( <replaceable>context_item</replaceable>, <replaceable>path_expression</replaceable> <optional> PASSING { <replaceable>value</replaceable> AS <replaceable>varname</replaceable> } <optional>, ...</optional> </optional> COLUMNS ( <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> <optional>, ...</optional> ) + <optional> + PLAN DEFAULT ( { INNER | OUTER } <optional> , { CROSS | UNION } </optional> + | { CROSS | UNION } <optional> , { INNER | OUTER } </optional> ) + </optional> ) <phrase> where <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> is: @@ -19268,7 +19272,8 @@ where <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> is: The rows produced by <function>JSON_TABLE</function> are laterally joined to the row that generated them, so you do not have to explicitly join the constructed view with the original table holding <acronym>JSON</acronym> - data. + data. Optionally, you can specify how to join the columns returned + by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal> using the <literal>PLAN DEFAULT</literal> clause. </para> <para> @@ -19281,22 +19286,6 @@ where <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> is: the resulting rows are joined to the parent row. </para> - <para> - Columns with parent/child relationship are joined using - <literal>LEFT OUTER JOIN</literal>, so that the parent row - is always included into the output even if it does not have any child rows - after joining the data returned by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal>, - with NULL values inserted into the child columns if the corresponding - values are missing. - </para> - - <para> - Sibling columns are joined using - <literal>FULL OUTER JOIN ON FALSE</literal>, so that both parent and child - rows are included into the output, with NULL values inserted - into both child and parrent columns for all missing values. - </para> - </sect5> <sect5> <title>Parameters</title> @@ -19468,6 +19457,10 @@ where <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> is: <function>JSON_TABLE</function> expressions in an SQL statement. </para> + <para> + You can use the <literal>PLAN DEFAULT</literal> clause to define how + to join the columns returned by <replaceable>NESTED PATH</replaceable> clauses. + </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> @@ -19490,8 +19483,99 @@ where <replaceable class="parameter">json_table_column</replaceable> is: </listitem> </varlistentry> + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>PLAN DEFAULT ( <replaceable>option</replaceable> <optional>, ... </optional> )</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + <para> + Defines how to join the data returned by <replaceable>NESTED PATH</replaceable> + clauses to the constructed view. The <literal>INNER</literal> and + <literal>OUTER</literal> options define the joining plan for parent/child + columns, while <literal>UNION</literal> and <literal>CROSS</literal> + affect the sibling columns. You can override the default plans for all + columns at once. + </para> + + <para> + To join columns with parent/child relationship, you can use: + </para> + <variablelist> + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>INNER</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + + <para> + Use <literal>INNER JOIN</literal>, so that the parent row + is omitted from the output if it does not have any child rows + after joining the data returned by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal>. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>OUTER</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + + <para> + Use <literal>LEFT OUTER JOIN</literal>, so that the parent row + is always included into the output even if it does not have any child rows + after joining the data returned by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal>, with NULL values + inserted into the child columns if the corresponding + values are missing. + </para> + <para> + This is the default option for joining columns with parent/child relationship. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> + + <para> + To join sibling columns, you can use: + </para> + + <variablelist> + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>UNION</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + + <para> + Use <literal>FULL OUTER JOIN ON FALSE</literal>, so that both parent and child + rows are included into the output, with NULL values inserted + into both child and parrent columns for all missing values. + </para> + <para> + This is the default option for joining sibling columns. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>CROSS</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + + <para> + Use <literal>CROSS JOIN</literal>, so that the output includes + a row for every possible combination of rows from the left-hand + and the right-hand columns. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + </variablelist> </sect5> <sect5> diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c index 5e35e57697..ffa8f7e39b 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c @@ -2677,6 +2677,7 @@ _copyJsonTable(const JsonTable *from) COPY_NODE_FIELD(columns); COPY_NODE_FIELD(on_error); COPY_NODE_FIELD(alias); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(join_type); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(location); return newnode; @@ -2715,6 +2716,8 @@ _copyJsonTableParentNode(const JsonTableParentNode *from) COPY_NODE_FIELD(path); COPY_NODE_FIELD(child); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(outerJoin); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(unionJoin); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(colMin); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(colMax); @@ -2731,6 +2734,7 @@ _copyJsonTableSiblingNode(const JsonTableSiblingNode *from) COPY_NODE_FIELD(larg); COPY_NODE_FIELD(rarg); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(cross); return newnode; } diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c index adcb608756..5351be8bb4 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c @@ -152,6 +152,8 @@ _equalJsonTableParentNode(const JsonTableParentNode *a, const JsonTableParentNod { COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(path); COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(child); + COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(outerJoin); + COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(unionJoin); COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(colMin); COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(colMax); @@ -163,6 +165,7 @@ _equalJsonTableSiblingNode(const JsonTableSiblingNode *a, const JsonTableSibling { COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(larg); COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(rarg); + COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(cross); return true; } diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c index 80bb16e504..2a18d6ad66 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c @@ -1872,6 +1872,8 @@ _outJsonTableParentNode(StringInfo str, const JsonTableParentNode *node) WRITE_NODE_FIELD(path); WRITE_NODE_FIELD(child); + WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(outerJoin); + WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(unionJoin); WRITE_INT_FIELD(colMin); WRITE_INT_FIELD(colMax); } @@ -1883,6 +1885,7 @@ _outJsonTableSiblingNode(StringInfo str, const JsonTableSiblingNode *node) WRITE_NODE_FIELD(larg); WRITE_NODE_FIELD(rarg); + WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(cross); } /***************************************************************************** diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c index cc173a38ec..b9f12205b3 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c @@ -1506,6 +1506,8 @@ _readJsonTableParentNode(void) READ_NODE_FIELD(path); READ_NODE_FIELD(child); + READ_BOOL_FIELD(outerJoin); + READ_BOOL_FIELD(unionJoin); READ_INT_FIELD(colMin); READ_INT_FIELD(colMax); @@ -1519,6 +1521,7 @@ _readJsonTableSiblingNode(void) READ_NODE_FIELD(larg); READ_NODE_FIELD(rarg); + READ_BOOL_FIELD(cross); READ_DONE(); } diff --git a/src/backend/parser/gram.y b/src/backend/parser/gram.y index 01804dab46..f9ab89bf99 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y +++ b/src/backend/parser/gram.y @@ -667,6 +667,11 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, List *aliases, Node *query); %type <ival> json_encoding json_encoding_clause_opt + json_table_plan_clause_opt + json_table_default_plan + json_table_default_plan_choices + json_table_default_plan_inner_outer + json_table_default_plan_union_cross json_wrapper_clause_opt json_wrapper_behavior json_conditional_or_unconditional_opt @@ -780,7 +785,7 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, List *aliases, Node *query); ORDER ORDINALITY OTHERS OUT_P OUTER_P OVER OVERLAPS OVERLAY OVERRIDING OWNED OWNER - PARALLEL PARSER PARTIAL PARTITION PASSING PASSWORD PATH PLACING PLANS POLICY + PARALLEL PARSER PARTIAL PARTITION PASSING PASSWORD PATH PLACING PLAN PLANS POLICY POSITION PRECEDING PRECISION PRESERVE PREPARE PREPARED PRIMARY PRIOR PRIVILEGES PROCEDURAL PROCEDURE PROCEDURES PROGRAM PUBLICATION @@ -15515,13 +15520,15 @@ json_table: JSON_TABLE '(' json_api_common_syntax json_table_columns_clause + json_table_plan_clause_opt json_table_error_clause_opt ')' { JsonTable *n = makeNode(JsonTable); n->common = (JsonCommon *) $3; n->columns = $4; - n->on_error = $5; + n->join_type = $5; + n->on_error = $6; n->location = @1; $$ = (Node *) n; } @@ -15658,6 +15665,34 @@ path_opt: | /* EMPTY */ { } ; +json_table_plan_clause_opt: + json_table_default_plan { $$ = $1; } + | /* EMPTY */ { $$ = JSTPJ_OUTER | JSTPJ_UNION; } + ; + +json_table_default_plan: + PLAN DEFAULT '(' json_table_default_plan_choices ')' { $$ = $4; } + ; + +json_table_default_plan_choices: + json_table_default_plan_inner_outer { $$ = $1 | JSTPJ_UNION; } + | json_table_default_plan_inner_outer ',' + json_table_default_plan_union_cross { $$ = $1 | $3; } + | json_table_default_plan_union_cross { $$ = $1 | JSTPJ_OUTER; } + | json_table_default_plan_union_cross ',' + json_table_default_plan_inner_outer { $$ = $1 | $3; } + ; + +json_table_default_plan_inner_outer: + INNER_P { $$ = JSTPJ_INNER; } + | OUTER_P { $$ = JSTPJ_OUTER; } + ; + +json_table_default_plan_union_cross: + UNION { $$ = JSTPJ_UNION; } + | CROSS { $$ = JSTPJ_CROSS; } + ; + json_returning_clause_opt: RETURNING Typename { @@ -16557,6 +16592,7 @@ unreserved_keyword: | PASSING | PASSWORD | PATH + | PLAN | PLANS | POLICY | PRECEDING @@ -17172,6 +17208,7 @@ bare_label_keyword: | PASSWORD | PATH | PLACING + | PLAN | PLANS | POLICY | POSITION diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c b/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c index 94c96606c1..41fe7659de 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c +++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c @@ -174,12 +174,13 @@ transformNestedJsonTableColumn(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTableColumn *jtc) } static Node * -makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(Node *lnode, Node *rnode) +makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(bool cross, Node *lnode, Node *rnode) { JsonTableSiblingNode *join = makeNode(JsonTableSiblingNode); join->larg = lnode; join->rarg = rnode; + join->cross = cross; return (Node *) join; } @@ -187,7 +188,7 @@ makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(Node *lnode, Node *rnode) /* * Recursively transform child (nested) JSON_TABLE columns. * - * Child columns are transformed into a binary tree of union-joined + * Child columns are transformed into a binary tree of union/cross-joined * JsonTableSiblingNodes. */ static Node * @@ -195,8 +196,9 @@ transformJsonTableChildColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, List *columns) { Node *res = NULL; ListCell *lc; + bool cross = cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_CROSS; - /* transform all nested columns into union join */ + /* transform all nested columns into union/cros join */ foreach(lc, columns) { JsonTableColumn *jtc = castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc)); @@ -208,7 +210,7 @@ transformJsonTableChildColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, List *columns) node = transformNestedJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc); /* join transformed node with previous sibling nodes */ - res = res ? makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(res, node) : node; + res = res ? makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(cross, res, node) : node; } return res; @@ -386,6 +388,9 @@ transformJsonTableColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, List *columns, char *pathSpec, /* transform recursively nested columns */ node->child = transformJsonTableChildColumns(cxt, columns); + node->outerJoin = cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_OUTER; + node->unionJoin = cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_UNION; + return node; } diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c index ebfa226bf3..4512c529e7 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/jsonpath_exec.c @@ -175,6 +175,7 @@ struct JsonTableScanState Datum current; int ordinal; bool currentIsNull; + bool outerJoin; bool errorOnError; bool advanceNested; bool reset; @@ -188,6 +189,7 @@ struct JsonTableJoinState { JsonTableJoinState *left; JsonTableJoinState *right; + bool cross; bool advanceRight; } join; JsonTableScanState scan; @@ -3166,6 +3168,7 @@ JsonTableInitScanState(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTableScanState *scan, int i; scan->parent = parent; + scan->outerJoin = node->outerJoin; scan->errorOnError = node->errorOnError; scan->path = DatumGetJsonPathP(node->path->constvalue); scan->args = args; @@ -3192,6 +3195,7 @@ JsonTableInitPlanState(JsonTableContext *cxt, Node *plan, JsonTableSiblingNode *join = castNode(JsonTableSiblingNode, plan); state->is_join = true; + state->u.join.cross = join->cross; state->u.join.left = JsonTableInitPlanState(cxt, join->larg, parent); state->u.join.right = JsonTableInitPlanState(cxt, join->rarg, parent); } @@ -3328,8 +3332,26 @@ JsonTableSetDocument(TableFuncScanState *state, Datum value) JsonTableResetContextItem(&cxt->root, value); } +/* Recursively reset scan and its child nodes */ +static void +JsonTableRescanRecursive(JsonTableJoinState *state) +{ + if (state->is_join) + { + JsonTableRescanRecursive(state->u.join.left); + JsonTableRescanRecursive(state->u.join.right); + state->u.join.advanceRight = false; + } + else + { + JsonTableRescan(&state->u.scan); + if (state->u.scan.nested) + JsonTableRescanRecursive(state->u.scan.nested); + } +} + /* - * Fetch next row from a union joined scan. + * Fetch next row from a cross/union joined scan. * * Returned false at the end of a scan, true otherwise. */ @@ -3339,17 +3361,48 @@ JsonTableNextJoinRow(JsonTableJoinState *state) if (!state->is_join) return JsonTableNextRow(&state->u.scan); - if (!state->u.join.advanceRight) + if (state->u.join.advanceRight) { - /* fetch next outer row */ - if (JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.left)) + /* fetch next inner row */ + if (JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.right)) return true; - state->u.join.advanceRight = true; /* next inner row */ + /* inner rows are exhausted */ + if (state->u.join.cross) + state->u.join.advanceRight = false; /* next outer row */ + else + return false; /* end of scan */ } - /* fetch next inner row */ - return JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.right); + while (!state->u.join.advanceRight) + { + /* fetch next outer row */ + bool left = JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.left); + + if (state->u.join.cross) + { + if (!left) + return false; /* end of scan */ + + JsonTableRescanRecursive(state->u.join.right); + + if (!JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.right)) + continue; /* next outer row */ + + state->u.join.advanceRight = true; /* next inner row */ + } + else if (!left) + { + if (!JsonTableNextJoinRow(state->u.join.right)) + return false; /* end of scan */ + + state->u.join.advanceRight = true; /* next inner row */ + } + + break; + } + + return true; } /* Recursively set 'reset' flag of scan and its child nodes */ @@ -3373,16 +3426,13 @@ JsonTableJoinReset(JsonTableJoinState *state) } /* - * Fetch next row from a simple scan with outer joined nested subscans. + * Fetch next row from a simple scan with outer/inner joined nested subscans. * * Returned false at the end of a scan, true otherwise. */ static bool JsonTableNextRow(JsonTableScanState *scan) { - JsonbValue *jbv; - MemoryContext oldcxt; - /* reset context item if requested */ if (scan->reset) { @@ -3394,34 +3444,44 @@ JsonTableNextRow(JsonTableScanState *scan) if (scan->advanceNested) { /* fetch next nested row */ - if (JsonTableNextJoinRow(scan->nested)) - return true; + scan->advanceNested = JsonTableNextJoinRow(scan->nested); - scan->advanceNested = false; + if (scan->advanceNested) + return true; } - /* fetch next row */ - jbv = JsonValueListNext(&scan->found, &scan->iter); - - if (!jbv) + for (;;) { - scan->current = PointerGetDatum(NULL); - scan->currentIsNull = true; - return false; /* end of scan */ - } + /* fetch next row */ + JsonbValue *jbv = JsonValueListNext(&scan->found, &scan->iter); + MemoryContext oldcxt; - /* set current row item */ - oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(scan->mcxt); - scan->current = JsonbPGetDatum(JsonbValueToJsonb(jbv)); - scan->currentIsNull = false; - MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt); + if (!jbv) + { + scan->current = PointerGetDatum(NULL); + scan->currentIsNull = true; + return false; /* end of scan */ + } - scan->ordinal++; + /* set current row item */ + oldcxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(scan->mcxt); + scan->current = JsonbPGetDatum(JsonbValueToJsonb(jbv)); + scan->currentIsNull = false; + MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldcxt); + + scan->ordinal++; + + if (!scan->nested) + break; - if (scan->nested) - { JsonTableJoinReset(scan->nested); + scan->advanceNested = JsonTableNextJoinRow(scan->nested); + + if (scan->advanceNested || scan->outerJoin) + break; + + /* state->ordinal--; */ /* skip current outer row, reset counter */ } return true; diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c index a52337b586..780f6520c6 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c @@ -11182,6 +11182,15 @@ get_json_table(TableFunc *tf, deparse_context *context, bool showimplicit) get_json_table_columns(tf, root, context, showimplicit); + if (!root->outerJoin || !root->unionJoin) + { + appendStringInfoChar(buf, ' '); + appendContextKeyword(context, "PLAN DEFAULT", 0, 0, 0); + appendStringInfo(buf, "(%s, %s)", + root->outerJoin ? "OUTER" : "INNER", + root->unionJoin ? "UNION" : "CROSS"); + } + if (jexpr->on_error->btype != JSON_BEHAVIOR_EMPTY) get_json_behavior(jexpr->on_error, context, "ERROR"); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h index 55dbdd8107..0de78dd6ad 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h @@ -1655,6 +1655,18 @@ typedef struct JsonTableColumn int location; /* token location, or -1 if unknown */ } JsonTableColumn; +/* + * JsonTablePlanJoinType - + * flags for JSON_TABLE join types representation + */ +typedef enum JsonTablePlanJoinType +{ + JSTPJ_INNER = 0x01, + JSTPJ_OUTER = 0x02, + JSTPJ_CROSS = 0x04, + JSTPJ_UNION = 0x08, +} JsonTablePlanJoinType; + /* * JsonTable - * untransformed representation of JSON_TABLE @@ -1664,6 +1676,7 @@ typedef struct JsonTable NodeTag type; JsonCommon *common; /* common JSON path syntax fields */ List *columns; /* list of JsonTableColumn */ + JsonTablePlanJoinType join_type; /* DEFAULT PLAN join type */ JsonBehavior *on_error; /* ON ERROR behavior, if specified */ Alias *alias; /* table alias in FROM clause */ bool lateral; /* does it have LATERAL prefix? */ diff --git a/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h b/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h index 57420a572f..1aa3e01048 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h @@ -1476,6 +1476,8 @@ typedef struct JsonTableParentNode NodeTag type; Const *path; /* jsonpath constant */ Node *child; /* nested columns, if any */ + bool outerJoin; /* outer or inner join for nested columns? */ + bool unionJoin; /* union or cross join for nested columns? */ int colMin; /* min column index in the resulting column list */ int colMax; /* max column index in the resulting column list */ bool errorOnError; /* ERROR/EMPTY ON ERROR behavior */ @@ -1490,6 +1492,7 @@ typedef struct JsonTableSiblingNode NodeTag type; Node *larg; /* left join node */ Node *rarg; /* right join node */ + bool cross; /* cross or union join? */ } JsonTableSiblingNode; /* ---------------- diff --git a/src/include/parser/kwlist.h b/src/include/parser/kwlist.h index 15f586d455..6065bbae88 100644 --- a/src/include/parser/kwlist.h +++ b/src/include/parser/kwlist.h @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ PG_KEYWORD("passing", PASSING, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("password", PASSWORD, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("path", PATH, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("placing", PLACING, RESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) +PG_KEYWORD("plan", PLAN, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("plans", PLANS, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("policy", POLICY, UNRESERVED_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) PG_KEYWORD("position", POSITION, COL_NAME_KEYWORD, BARE_LABEL) diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out b/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out index d89c3bef44..0cd8f73c66 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out @@ -1420,6 +1420,124 @@ from 4 | -1 | 2 | (11 rows) +-- default plan (outer, union) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (outer, union) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c +---+----+---+---- + 1 | 1 | | + 2 | 2 | 1 | + 2 | 2 | 2 | + 2 | 2 | 3 | + 2 | 2 | | 10 + 2 | 2 | | + 2 | 2 | | 20 + 3 | 3 | 1 | + 3 | 3 | 2 | + 4 | -1 | 1 | + 4 | -1 | 2 | +(11 rows) + +-- default plan (inner, union) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (inner) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c +---+----+---+---- + 2 | 2 | 1 | + 2 | 2 | 2 | + 2 | 2 | 3 | + 2 | 2 | | 10 + 2 | 2 | | + 2 | 2 | | 20 + 3 | 3 | 1 | + 3 | 3 | 2 | + 4 | -1 | 1 | + 4 | -1 | 2 | +(10 rows) + +-- default plan (inner, cross) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (cross, inner) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c +---+---+---+---- + 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 1 | + 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 2 | + 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 3 | + 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 +(9 rows) + +-- default plan (outer, cross) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (outer, cross) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c +---+----+---+---- + 1 | 1 | | + 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 1 | + 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 2 | + 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 3 | + 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 + 3 | 3 | | + 4 | -1 | | +(12 rows) + -- Should succeed (JSON arguments are passed to root and nested paths) SELECT * FROM diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql index 6614dd6e45..cd97ff7f46 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql @@ -547,6 +547,71 @@ from ) ) jt; +-- default plan (outer, union) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (outer, union) + ) jt; + +-- default plan (inner, union) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (inner) + ) jt; + +-- default plan (inner, cross) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (cross, inner) + ) jt; + +-- default plan (outer, cross) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan default (outer, cross) + ) jt; + + -- Should succeed (JSON arguments are passed to root and nested paths) SELECT * FROM diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index 063d639f65..27cf806043 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -1237,6 +1237,7 @@ JsonTableColumnType JsonTableContext JsonTableJoinState JsonTableParentNode +JsonTablePlanJoinType JsonTableScanState JsonTableSiblingNode JsonTokenType -- 2.25.4 --------------5BB5E3CCDF424A5E7F475161 Content-Type: text/x-patch; charset=UTF-8; name="0004-JSON_TABLE-PLAN-clause-v51.patch" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="0004-JSON_TABLE-PLAN-clause-v51.patch" =46rom d4f4cf355094ec4a9c05f192e15d0f1d3294c1f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 18:18:24 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] JSON_TABLE PLAN clause --- doc/src/sgml/func.sgml | 97 +++- src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c | 26 +- src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c | 2 +- src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c | 19 + src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c | 2 +- src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c | 2 +- src/backend/parser/gram.y | 101 +++- src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c | 322 +++++++++++-- src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c | 57 ++- src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h | 2 + src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h | 31 +- src/include/nodes/primnodes.h | 2 +- src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out | 506 ++++++++++++++++++-- src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql | 355 ++++++++++++-- src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 2 + 15 files changed, 1389 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml index 746f24501a..a660cdf956 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/func.sgml @@ -19205,9 +19205,10 @@ FROM =20 <synopsis> JSON_TABLE ( - <replaceable>context_item</replaceable>, <replaceable>path_expression<= /replaceable> <optional> PASSING { <replaceable>value</replaceable> AS <r= eplaceable>varname</replaceable> } <optional>, ...</optional> </optional>= + <replaceable>context_item</replaceable>, <replaceable>path_expression<= /replaceable> <optional> AS <replaceable>json_path_name</replaceable> </o= ptional> <optional> PASSING { <replaceable>value</replaceable> AS <replac= eable>varname</replaceable> } <optional>, ...</optional> </optional> COLUMNS ( <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_table_column</replacea= ble> <optional>, ...</optional> ) <optional> + PLAN ( <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_table_plan</replaceable= > ) | PLAN DEFAULT ( { INNER | OUTER } <optional> , { CROSS | UNION } </op= tional> | { CROSS | UNION } <optional> , { INNER | OUTER } </op= tional> ) </optional> @@ -19231,6 +19232,16 @@ where <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_tabl= e_column</replaceable> is: | NESTED PATH <replaceable>json_path_specification</replaceable> <opti= onal> AS <replaceable>path_name</replaceable> </optional> COLUMNS ( <replaceable>json_table_column</replaceable> <optional= >, ...</optional> ) | <replaceable>name</replaceable> FOR ORDINALITY +<phrase> +<replaceable>json_table_plan</replaceable> is: +</phrase> + <replaceable>json_path_name</replaceable> <optional> { OUTER | INNER= } <replaceable>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> </optional> + | <replaceable>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> { UNION <replacea= ble>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> } <optional>...</optional> + | <replaceable>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> { CROSS <replacea= ble>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> } <optional>...</optional> +<phrase> +<replaceable>json_table_plan_primary</replaceable> is: +</phrase> + <replaceable>json_path_name</replaceable> | ( <replaceable>json_tabl= e_plan</replaceable> ) =20 </synopsis> =20 @@ -19273,7 +19284,7 @@ where <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_table= _column</replaceable> is: joined to the row that generated them, so you do not have to expli= citly join the constructed view with the original table holding <acronym>JSON= </acronym> data. Optionally, you can specify how to join the columns returned= - by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal> using the <literal>PLAN DEFAULT<= /literal> clause. + by <literal>NESTED PATH</literal> using the <literal>PLAN</literal= > clause. </para> =20 <para> @@ -19458,7 +19469,7 @@ where <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_table= _column</replaceable> is: </para> =20 <para> - You can use the <literal>PLAN DEFAULT</literal> clause to define ho= w + You can use the <literal>PLAN</literal> clause to define how to join the columns returned by <replaceable>NESTED PATH</replaceab= le> clauses. </para> </listitem> @@ -19485,18 +19496,31 @@ where <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_tab= le_column</replaceable> is: =20 <varlistentry> <term> - <literal>PLAN DEFAULT ( <replaceable>option</replaceable> <optional= >, ... </optional> )</literal> + <literal>AS <replaceable>json_path_name</replaceable></literal> </term> <listitem> - <para> - Defines how to join the data returned by <replaceable>NESTED PATH<= /replaceable> - clauses to the constructed view. The <literal>INNER</literal> and - <literal>OUTER</literal> options define the joining plan for paren= t/child - columns, while <literal>UNION</literal> and <literal>CROSS</litera= l> - affect the sibling columns. You can override the default plans for= all - columns at once. - </para> =20 + <para> + The optional <replaceable>json_path_name</replaceable> serves as an= + identifier of the provided <replaceable>json_path_specification</re= placeable>. + The path name must be unique and cannot coincide with column names.= + When using the <literal>PLAN</literal> clause, you must specify the= names + for all the paths, including the row pattern. Each path name can ap= pear in + the <literal>PLAN</literal> clause only once. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>PLAN ( <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_table_plan</r= eplaceable> )</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + + <para> + Defines how to join the data returned by <replaceable>NESTED PATH</= replaceable> + clauses to the constructed view. + </para> <para> To join columns with parent/child relationship, you can use: </para> @@ -19575,6 +19599,23 @@ where <replaceable class=3D"parameter">json_tabl= e_column</replaceable> is: =20 </listitem> </varlistentry> + + <varlistentry> + <term> + <literal>PLAN DEFAULT ( <replaceable>option</replaceable> <optional= >, ... </optional> )</literal> + </term> + <listitem> + <para> + Overrides the default joining plans. The <literal>INNER</literal> = and + <literal>OUTER</literal> options define the joining plan for paren= t/child + columns, while <literal>UNION</literal> and <literal>CROSS</litera= l> + affect the sibling columns. You can override the default plans for= all columns at once. + Even though the path names are not included into the <literal>PLAN= DEFAULT</literal> + clause, they must be provided for all the paths to conform to + the SQL/JSON standard. + </para> + </listitem> + </varlistentry> </variablelist> </sect5> =20 @@ -19606,9 +19647,35 @@ SELECT jt.* FROM </screen> </para> =20 - </sect5> - </sect4> - + <para> + Find a director that has done films in two different genres: +<screen> +SELECT + director1 AS director, title1, kind1, title2, kind2 +FROM + my_films, + JSON_TABLE ( js, '$.favorites' AS favs COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS films1 COLUMNS ( + kind1 text PATH '$.kind', + NESTED PATH '$.films[*]' AS film1 COLUMNS ( + title1 text PATH '$.title', + director1 text PATH '$.director') + ), + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS films2 COLUMNS ( + kind2 text PATH '$.kind', + NESTED PATH '$.films[*]' AS film2 COLUMNS ( + title2 text PATH '$.title', + director2 text PATH '$.director' + ) + ) + ) + PLAN (favs OUTER ((films1 INNER film1) CROSS (films2 INNER film2))) + ) AS jt + WHERE kind1 > kind2 AND director1 =3D director2; +</screen> + </para> + </sect5> + </sect4> </sect3> =20 <sect3 id=3D"functions-sqljson-serializing"> diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.= c index ffa8f7e39b..f3d84485fe 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c @@ -2675,9 +2675,9 @@ _copyJsonTable(const JsonTable *from) =20 COPY_NODE_FIELD(common); COPY_NODE_FIELD(columns); + COPY_NODE_FIELD(plan); COPY_NODE_FIELD(on_error); COPY_NODE_FIELD(alias); - COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(join_type); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(location); =20 return newnode; @@ -2695,6 +2695,7 @@ _copyJsonTableColumn(const JsonTableColumn *from) COPY_STRING_FIELD(name); COPY_NODE_FIELD(typeName); COPY_STRING_FIELD(pathspec); + COPY_STRING_FIELD(pathname); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(format); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(wrapper); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(omit_quotes); @@ -2706,6 +2707,24 @@ _copyJsonTableColumn(const JsonTableColumn *from) return newnode; } =20 +/* + * _copyJsonTablePlan + */ +static JsonTablePlan * +_copyJsonTablePlan(const JsonTablePlan *from) +{ + JsonTablePlan *newnode =3D makeNode(JsonTablePlan); + + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(plan_type); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(join_type); + COPY_STRING_FIELD(pathname); + COPY_NODE_FIELD(plan1); + COPY_NODE_FIELD(plan2); + COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(location); + + return newnode; +} + /* * _copyJsonTableParentNode */ @@ -2715,9 +2734,9 @@ _copyJsonTableParentNode(const JsonTableParentNode = *from) JsonTableParentNode *newnode =3D makeNode(JsonTableParentNode); =20 COPY_NODE_FIELD(path); + COPY_STRING_FIELD(name); COPY_NODE_FIELD(child); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(outerJoin); - COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(unionJoin); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(colMin); COPY_SCALAR_FIELD(colMax); =20 @@ -5822,6 +5841,9 @@ copyObjectImpl(const void *from) case T_JsonTableColumn: retval =3D _copyJsonTableColumn(from); break; + case T_JsonTablePlan: + retval =3D _copyJsonTablePlan(from); + break; case T_JsonTableParentNode: retval =3D _copyJsonTableParentNode(from); break; diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/equalfunc= s.c index 5351be8bb4..123d5062e7 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/equalfuncs.c @@ -151,9 +151,9 @@ static bool _equalJsonTableParentNode(const JsonTableParentNode *a, const JsonTableP= arentNode *b) { COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(path); + COMPARE_STRING_FIELD(name); COMPARE_NODE_FIELD(child); COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(outerJoin); - COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(unionJoin); COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(colMin); COMPARE_SCALAR_FIELD(colMax); =20 diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.= c index ca374dcb29..46d7f61e25 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/makefuncs.c @@ -864,6 +864,25 @@ makeJsonBehavior(JsonBehaviorType type, Node *defaul= t_expr) return behavior; } =20 +/* + * makeJsonTableJoinedPlan - + * creates a joined JsonTablePlan node + */ +Node * +makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JsonTablePlanJoinType type, Node *plan1, Node *p= lan2, + int location) +{ + JsonTablePlan *n =3D makeNode(JsonTablePlan); + + n->plan_type =3D JSTP_JOINED; + n->join_type =3D type; + n->plan1 =3D castNode(JsonTablePlan, plan1); + n->plan2 =3D castNode(JsonTablePlan, plan2); + n->location =3D location; + + return (Node *) n; +} + /* * makeJsonEncoding - * converts JSON encoding name to enum JsonEncoding diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c index 2a18d6ad66..8c0b78d73f 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/outfuncs.c @@ -1871,9 +1871,9 @@ _outJsonTableParentNode(StringInfo str, const JsonT= ableParentNode *node) WRITE_NODE_TYPE("JSONTABPNODE"); =20 WRITE_NODE_FIELD(path); + WRITE_STRING_FIELD(name); WRITE_NODE_FIELD(child); WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(outerJoin); - WRITE_BOOL_FIELD(unionJoin); WRITE_INT_FIELD(colMin); WRITE_INT_FIELD(colMax); } diff --git a/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c b/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.= c index b9f12205b3..d73689ee97 100644 --- a/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c +++ b/src/backend/nodes/readfuncs.c @@ -1505,9 +1505,9 @@ _readJsonTableParentNode(void) READ_LOCALS(JsonTableParentNode); =20 READ_NODE_FIELD(path); + READ_STRING_FIELD(name); READ_NODE_FIELD(child); READ_BOOL_FIELD(outerJoin); - READ_BOOL_FIELD(unionJoin); READ_INT_FIELD(colMin); READ_INT_FIELD(colMax); =20 diff --git a/src/backend/parser/gram.y b/src/backend/parser/gram.y index f9ab89bf99..1ed59f63c8 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/gram.y +++ b/src/backend/parser/gram.y @@ -652,6 +652,18 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, = List *aliases, Node *query); json_table_formatted_column_definition json_table_exists_column_definition json_table_nested_columns + json_table_plan_clause_opt + json_table_specific_plan + json_table_plan + json_table_plan_simple + json_table_plan_parent_child + json_table_plan_outer + json_table_plan_inner + json_table_plan_sibling + json_table_plan_union + json_table_plan_cross + json_table_plan_primary + json_table_default_plan =20 %type <list> json_name_and_value_list json_value_expr_list @@ -667,8 +679,6 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, L= ist *aliases, Node *query); =20 %type <ival> json_encoding json_encoding_clause_opt - json_table_plan_clause_opt - json_table_default_plan json_table_default_plan_choices json_table_default_plan_inner_outer json_table_default_plan_union_cross @@ -15527,7 +15537,7 @@ json_table: JsonTable *n =3D makeNode(JsonTable); n->common =3D (JsonCommon *) $3; n->columns =3D $4; - n->join_type =3D $5; + n->plan =3D (JsonTablePlan *) $5; n->on_error =3D $6; n->location =3D @1; $$ =3D (Node *) n; @@ -15649,12 +15659,15 @@ json_table_formatted_column_definition: ; =20 json_table_nested_columns: - NESTED path_opt Sconst json_table_columns_clause + NESTED path_opt Sconst + json_as_path_name_clause_opt + json_table_columns_clause { JsonTableColumn *n =3D makeNode(JsonTableColumn); n->coltype =3D JTC_NESTED; n->pathspec =3D $3; - n->columns =3D $4; + n->pathname =3D $4; + n->columns =3D $5; n->location =3D @1; $$ =3D (Node *) n; } @@ -15666,12 +15679,84 @@ path_opt: ; =20 json_table_plan_clause_opt: - json_table_default_plan { $$ =3D $1; } - | /* EMPTY */ { $$ =3D JSTPJ_OUTER | JSTPJ_UNION; } + json_table_specific_plan { $$ =3D $1; } + | json_table_default_plan { $$ =3D $1; } + | /* EMPTY */ { $$ =3D NULL; } + ; + +json_table_specific_plan: + PLAN '(' json_table_plan ')' { $$ =3D $3; } + ; + +json_table_plan: + json_table_plan_simple + | json_table_plan_parent_child + | json_table_plan_sibling + ; + +json_table_plan_simple: + json_table_path_name + { + JsonTablePlan *n =3D makeNode(JsonTablePlan); + n->plan_type =3D JSTP_SIMPLE; + n->pathname =3D $1; + n->location =3D @1; + $$ =3D (Node *) n; + } + ; + +json_table_plan_parent_child: + json_table_plan_outer + | json_table_plan_inner + ; + +json_table_plan_outer: + json_table_plan_simple OUTER_P json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_OUTER, $1, $3, @1); } + ; + +json_table_plan_inner: + json_table_plan_simple INNER_P json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_INNER, $1, $3, @1); } + ; + +json_table_plan_sibling: + json_table_plan_union + | json_table_plan_cross + ; + +json_table_plan_union: + json_table_plan_primary UNION json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_UNION, $1, $3, @1); } + | json_table_plan_union UNION json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_UNION, $1, $3, @1); } + ; + +json_table_plan_cross: + json_table_plan_primary CROSS json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_CROSS, $1, $3, @1); } + | json_table_plan_cross CROSS json_table_plan_primary + { $$ =3D makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_CROSS, $1, $3, @1); } + ; + +json_table_plan_primary: + json_table_plan_simple { $$ =3D $1; } + | '(' json_table_plan ')' + { + castNode(JsonTablePlan, $2)->location =3D @1; + $$ =3D $2; + } ; =20 json_table_default_plan: - PLAN DEFAULT '(' json_table_default_plan_choices ')' { $$ =3D $4; } + PLAN DEFAULT '(' json_table_default_plan_choices ')' + { + JsonTablePlan *n =3D makeNode(JsonTablePlan); + n->plan_type =3D JSTP_DEFAULT; + n->join_type =3D $4; + n->location =3D @1; + $$ =3D (Node *) n; + } ; =20 json_table_default_plan_choices: diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c b/src/backend/parser/pa= rse_jsontable.c index 41fe7659de..eae5e699db 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c +++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_jsontable.c @@ -38,12 +38,15 @@ typedef struct JsonTableContext JsonTable *table; /* untransformed node */ TableFunc *tablefunc; /* transformed node */ List *pathNames; /* list of all path and columns names */ + int pathNameId; /* path name id counter */ Oid contextItemTypid; /* type oid of context item (json/jsonb) */ } JsonTableContext; =20 static JsonTableParentNode * transformJsonTableColumns(JsonTableContext = *cxt, + JsonTablePlan *plan, List *columns, char *pathSpec, + char **pathName, int location); =20 static Node * @@ -156,19 +159,154 @@ registerAllJsonTableColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt,= List *columns) JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc)); =20 if (jtc->coltype =3D=3D JTC_NESTED) + { + if (jtc->pathname) + registerJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc->pathname); + registerAllJsonTableColumns(cxt, jtc->columns); + } else + { registerJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc->name); + } + } +} + +/* Generate a new unique JSON_TABLE path name. */ +static char * +generateJsonTablePathName(JsonTableContext *cxt) +{ + char namebuf[32]; + char *name =3D namebuf; + + do + { + snprintf(namebuf, sizeof(namebuf), "json_table_path_%d", + ++cxt->pathNameId); + } while (isJsonTablePathNameDuplicate(cxt, name)); + + name =3D pstrdup(name); + cxt->pathNames =3D lappend(cxt->pathNames, name); + + return name; +} + +/* Collect sibling path names from plan to the specified list. */ +static void +collectSiblingPathsInJsonTablePlan(JsonTablePlan *plan, List **paths) +{ + if (plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_SIMPLE) + *paths =3D lappend(*paths, plan->pathname); + else if (plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_JOINED) + { + if (plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_INNER || + plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_OUTER) + { + Assert(plan->plan1->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_SIMPLE); + *paths =3D lappend(*paths, plan->plan1->pathname); + } + else if (plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_CROSS || + plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_UNION) + { + collectSiblingPathsInJsonTablePlan(plan->plan1, paths); + collectSiblingPathsInJsonTablePlan(plan->plan2, paths); + } + else + elog(ERROR, "invalid JSON_TABLE join type %d", + plan->join_type); + } +} + +/* + * Validate child JSON_TABLE plan by checking that: + * - all nested columns have path names specified + * - all nested columns have corresponding node in the sibling plan + * - plan does not contain duplicate or extra nodes + */ +static void +validateJsonTableChildPlan(ParseState *pstate, JsonTablePlan *plan, + List *columns) +{ + ListCell *lc1; + List *siblings =3D NIL; + int nchildren =3D 0; + + if (plan) + collectSiblingPathsInJsonTablePlan(plan, &siblings); + + foreach(lc1, columns) + { + JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc1)); + + if (jtc->coltype =3D=3D JTC_NESTED) + { + ListCell *lc2; + bool found =3D false; + + if (!jtc->pathname) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("nested JSON_TABLE columns shall contain " + "explicit AS pathname specification if " + "explicit PLAN clause is used"), + parser_errposition(pstate, jtc->location))); + + /* find nested path name in the list of sibling path names */ + foreach(lc2, siblings) + { + if ((found =3D !strcmp(jtc->pathname, lfirst(lc2)))) + break; + } + + if (!found) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE plan"), + errdetail("plan node for nested path %s " + "was not found in plan", jtc->pathname), + parser_errposition(pstate, jtc->location))); + + nchildren++; + } } + + if (list_length(siblings) > nchildren) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE plan"), + errdetail("plan node contains some extra or " + "duplicate sibling nodes"), + parser_errposition(pstate, plan ? plan->location : -1))); +} + +static JsonTableColumn * +findNestedJsonTableColumn(List *columns, const char *pathname) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + foreach(lc, columns) + { + JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc)); + + if (jtc->coltype =3D=3D JTC_NESTED && + jtc->pathname && + !strcmp(jtc->pathname, pathname)) + return jtc; + } + + return NULL; } =20 static Node * -transformNestedJsonTableColumn(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTableColumn *j= tc) +transformNestedJsonTableColumn(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTableColumn *j= tc, + JsonTablePlan *plan) { JsonTableParentNode *node; + char *pathname =3D jtc->pathname; =20 - node =3D transformJsonTableColumns(cxt, jtc->columns, jtc->pathspec, - jtc->location); + node =3D transformJsonTableColumns(cxt, plan, jtc->columns, jtc->pathsp= ec, + &pathname, jtc->location); + node->name =3D pstrdup(pathname); =20 return (Node *) node; } @@ -186,34 +324,78 @@ makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(bool cross, Node *lnode, N= ode *rnode) } =20 /* - * Recursively transform child (nested) JSON_TABLE columns. + * Recursively transform child JSON_TABLE plan. * - * Child columns are transformed into a binary tree of union/cross-joine= d - * JsonTableSiblingNodes. + * Default plan is transformed into a cross/union join of its nested col= umns. + * Simple and outer/inner plans are transformed into a JsonTableParentNo= de by + * finding and transforming corresponding nested column. + * Sibling plans are recursively transformed into a JsonTableSiblingNode= =2E */ static Node * -transformJsonTableChildColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, List *columns) +transformJsonTableChildPlan(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTablePlan *plan, + List *columns) { - Node *res =3D NULL; - ListCell *lc; - bool cross =3D cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_CROSS; + JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D NULL; =20 - /* transform all nested columns into union/cros join */ - foreach(lc, columns) + if (!plan || plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_DEFAULT) { - JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc)); - Node *node; + /* unspecified or default plan */ + Node *res =3D NULL; + ListCell *lc; + bool cross =3D plan && (plan->join_type & JSTPJ_CROSS); =20 - if (jtc->coltype !=3D JTC_NESTED) - continue; + /* transform all nested columns into cross/union join */ + foreach(lc, columns) + { + JsonTableColumn *jtc =3D castNode(JsonTableColumn, lfirst(lc)); + Node *node; =20 - node =3D transformNestedJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc); + if (jtc->coltype !=3D JTC_NESTED) + continue; + + node =3D transformNestedJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc, plan); + + /* join transformed node with previous sibling nodes */ + res =3D res ? makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(cross, res, node) : node; + } =20 - /* join transformed node with previous sibling nodes */ - res =3D res ? makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(cross, res, node) : node; + return res; + } + else if (plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_SIMPLE) + { + jtc =3D findNestedJsonTableColumn(columns, plan->pathname); } + else if (plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_JOINED) + { + if (plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_INNER || + plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_OUTER) + { + Assert(plan->plan1->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_SIMPLE); + jtc =3D findNestedJsonTableColumn(columns, plan->plan1->pathname); + } + else + { + Node *node1 =3D + transformJsonTableChildPlan(cxt, plan->plan1, columns); + Node *node2 =3D + transformJsonTableChildPlan(cxt, plan->plan2, columns); + + return makeJsonTableSiblingJoin(plan->join_type =3D=3D JSTPJ_CROSS, + node1, node2); + } + } + else + elog(ERROR, "invalid JSON_TABLE plan type %d", plan->plan_type); =20 - return res; + if (!jtc) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE plan"), + errdetail("path name was %s not found in nested columns list", + plan->pathname), + parser_errposition(cxt->pstate, plan->location))); + + return transformNestedJsonTableColumn(cxt, jtc, plan); } =20 /* Check whether type is json/jsonb, array, or record. */ @@ -377,19 +559,80 @@ makeParentJsonTableNode(JsonTableContext *cxt, char= *pathSpec, List *columns) } =20 static JsonTableParentNode * -transformJsonTableColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, List *columns, char *pa= thSpec, +transformJsonTableColumns(JsonTableContext *cxt, JsonTablePlan *plan, + List *columns, char *pathSpec, char **pathName, int location) { JsonTableParentNode *node; + JsonTablePlan *childPlan; + bool defaultPlan =3D !plan || plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_DEFAULT; + + if (!*pathName) + { + if (cxt->table->plan) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE expression"), + errdetail("JSON_TABLE columns shall contain " + "explicit AS pathname specification if " + "explicit PLAN clause is used"), + parser_errposition(cxt->pstate, location))); + + *pathName =3D generateJsonTablePathName(cxt); + } + + if (defaultPlan) + childPlan =3D plan; + else + { + /* validate parent and child plans */ + JsonTablePlan *parentPlan; + + if (plan->plan_type =3D=3D JSTP_JOINED) + { + if (plan->join_type !=3D JSTPJ_INNER && + plan->join_type !=3D JSTPJ_OUTER) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE plan"), + errdetail("expected INNER or OUTER JSON_TABLE plan node"), + parser_errposition(cxt->pstate, plan->location))); + + parentPlan =3D plan->plan1; + childPlan =3D plan->plan2; + + Assert(parentPlan->plan_type !=3D JSTP_JOINED); + Assert(parentPlan->pathname); + } + else + { + parentPlan =3D plan; + childPlan =3D NULL; + } + + if (strcmp(parentPlan->pathname, *pathName)) + ereport(ERROR, + (errcode(ERRCODE_SYNTAX_ERROR), + errmsg("invalid JSON_TABLE plan"), + errdetail("path name mismatch: expected %s but %s is given", + *pathName, parentPlan->pathname), + parser_errposition(cxt->pstate, plan->location))); + + validateJsonTableChildPlan(cxt->pstate, childPlan, columns); + } =20 /* transform only non-nested columns */ node =3D makeParentJsonTableNode(cxt, pathSpec, columns); + node->name =3D pstrdup(*pathName); =20 - /* transform recursively nested columns */ - node->child =3D transformJsonTableChildColumns(cxt, columns); - - node->outerJoin =3D cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_OUTER; - node->unionJoin =3D cxt->table->join_type & JSTPJ_UNION; + if (childPlan || defaultPlan) + { + /* transform recursively nested columns */ + node->child =3D transformJsonTableChildPlan(cxt, childPlan, columns); + if (node->child) + node->outerJoin =3D !plan || (plan->join_type & JSTPJ_OUTER); + /* else: default plan case, no children found */ + } =20 return node; } @@ -407,7 +650,9 @@ transformJsonTable(ParseState *pstate, JsonTable *jt)= JsonTableContext cxt; TableFunc *tf =3D makeNode(TableFunc); JsonFuncExpr *jfe =3D makeNode(JsonFuncExpr); + JsonTablePlan *plan =3D jt->plan; JsonCommon *jscommon; + char *rootPathName =3D jt->common->pathname; char *rootPath; bool is_lateral; =20 @@ -415,9 +660,31 @@ transformJsonTable(ParseState *pstate, JsonTable *jt= ) cxt.table =3D jt; cxt.tablefunc =3D tf; cxt.pathNames =3D NIL; + cxt.pathNameId =3D 0; + + if (rootPathName) + registerJsonTableColumn(&cxt, rootPathName); =20 registerAllJsonTableColumns(&cxt, jt->columns); =20 +#if 0 /* XXX it' unclear from the standard whether root path name is man= datory or not */ + if (plan && plan->plan_type !=3D JSTP_DEFAULT && !rootPathName) + { + /* Assign root path name and create corresponding plan node */ + JsonTablePlan *rootNode =3D makeNode(JsonTablePlan); + JsonTablePlan *rootPlan =3D (JsonTablePlan *) + makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JSTPJ_OUTER, (Node *) rootNode, + (Node *) plan, jt->location); + + rootPathName =3D generateJsonTablePathName(&cxt); + + rootNode->plan_type =3D JSTP_SIMPLE; + rootNode->pathname =3D rootPathName; + + plan =3D rootPlan; + } +#endif + jscommon =3D copyObject(jt->common); jscommon->pathspec =3D makeStringConst(pstrdup("$"), -1); =20 @@ -453,7 +720,8 @@ transformJsonTable(ParseState *pstate, JsonTable *jt)= =20 rootPath =3D castNode(A_Const, jt->common->pathspec)->val.sval.val; =20 - tf->plan =3D (Node *) transformJsonTableColumns(&cxt, jt->columns, root= Path, + tf->plan =3D (Node *) transformJsonTableColumns(&cxt, plan, jt->columns= , + rootPath, &rootPathName, jt->common->location); =20 tf->ordinalitycol =3D -1; /* undefine ordinality column number */ diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c b/src/backend/utils/adt/ru= leutils.c index 780f6520c6..e19749d12a 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/ruleutils.c @@ -11019,10 +11019,54 @@ get_json_table_nested_columns(TableFunc *tf, No= de *node, appendStringInfoChar(context->buf, ' '); appendContextKeyword(context, "NESTED PATH ", 0, 0, 0); get_const_expr(n->path, context, -1); + appendStringInfo(context->buf, " AS %s", quote_identifier(n->name)); get_json_table_columns(tf, n, context, showimplicit); } } =20 +/* + * get_json_table_plan - Parse back a JSON_TABLE plan + */ +static void +get_json_table_plan(TableFunc *tf, Node *node, deparse_context *context,= + bool parenthesize) +{ + if (parenthesize) + appendStringInfoChar(context->buf, '('); + + if (IsA(node, JsonTableSiblingNode)) + { + JsonTableSiblingNode *n =3D (JsonTableSiblingNode *) node; + + get_json_table_plan(tf, n->larg, context, + IsA(n->larg, JsonTableSiblingNode) || + castNode(JsonTableParentNode, n->larg)->child); + + appendStringInfoString(context->buf, n->cross ? " CROSS " : " UNION ")= ; + + get_json_table_plan(tf, n->rarg, context, + IsA(n->rarg, JsonTableSiblingNode) || + castNode(JsonTableParentNode, n->rarg)->child); + } + else + { + JsonTableParentNode *n =3D castNode(JsonTableParentNode, node); + + appendStringInfoString(context->buf, quote_identifier(n->name)); + + if (n->child) + { + appendStringInfoString(context->buf, + n->outerJoin ? " OUTER " : " INNER "); + get_json_table_plan(tf, n->child, context, + IsA(n->child, JsonTableSiblingNode)); + } + } + + if (parenthesize) + appendStringInfoChar(context->buf, ')'); +} + /* * get_json_table_columns - Parse back JSON_TABLE columns */ @@ -11151,6 +11195,8 @@ get_json_table(TableFunc *tf, deparse_context *co= ntext, bool showimplicit) =20 get_const_expr(root->path, context, -1); =20 + appendStringInfo(buf, " AS %s", quote_identifier(root->name)); + if (jexpr->passing_values) { ListCell *lc1, *lc2; @@ -11182,14 +11228,9 @@ get_json_table(TableFunc *tf, deparse_context *c= ontext, bool showimplicit) =20 get_json_table_columns(tf, root, context, showimplicit); =20 - if (!root->outerJoin || !root->unionJoin) - { - appendStringInfoChar(buf, ' '); - appendContextKeyword(context, "PLAN DEFAULT", 0, 0, 0); - appendStringInfo(buf, "(%s, %s)", - root->outerJoin ? "OUTER" : "INNER", - root->unionJoin ? "UNION" : "CROSS"); - } + appendStringInfoChar(buf, ' '); + appendContextKeyword(context, "PLAN ", 0, 0, 0); + get_json_table_plan(tf, (Node *) root, context, true); =20 if (jexpr->on_error->btype !=3D JSON_BEHAVIOR_EMPTY) get_json_behavior(jexpr->on_error, context, "ERROR"); diff --git a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.= h index 3f55d4b7fb..405547bad6 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/makefuncs.h @@ -110,6 +110,8 @@ extern JsonFormat *makeJsonFormat(JsonFormatType type= , JsonEncoding encoding, int location); extern JsonValueExpr *makeJsonValueExpr(Expr *expr, JsonFormat *format);= extern JsonBehavior *makeJsonBehavior(JsonBehaviorType type, Node *expr)= ; +extern Node *makeJsonTableJoinedPlan(JsonTablePlanJoinType type, + Node *plan1, Node *plan2, int location); extern Node *makeJsonKeyValue(Node *key, Node *value); extern Node *makeJsonIsPredicate(Node *expr, JsonFormat *format, JsonValueType vtype, bool unique_keys, diff --git a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h b/src/include/nodes/parsenode= s.h index 0de78dd6ad..d5f7dbcaa9 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h @@ -1646,6 +1646,7 @@ typedef struct JsonTableColumn char *name; /* column name */ TypeName *typeName; /* column type name */ JsonPathSpec pathspec; /* path specification, if any */ + char *pathname; /* path name, if any */ JsonFormat *format; /* JSON format clause, if specified */ JsonWrapper wrapper; /* WRAPPER behavior for formatted columns */ bool omit_quotes; /* omit or keep quotes on scalar strings? */ @@ -1655,6 +1656,17 @@ typedef struct JsonTableColumn int location; /* token location, or -1 if unknown */ } JsonTableColumn; =20 +/* + * JsonTablePlanType - + * flags for JSON_TABLE plan node types representation + */ +typedef enum JsonTablePlanType +{ + JSTP_DEFAULT, + JSTP_SIMPLE, + JSTP_JOINED, +} JsonTablePlanType; + /* * JsonTablePlanJoinType - * flags for JSON_TABLE join types representation @@ -1667,6 +1679,23 @@ typedef enum JsonTablePlanJoinType JSTPJ_UNION =3D 0x08, } JsonTablePlanJoinType; =20 +typedef struct JsonTablePlan JsonTablePlan; + +/* + * JsonTablePlan - + * untransformed representation of JSON_TABLE plan node + */ +struct JsonTablePlan +{ + NodeTag type; + JsonTablePlanType plan_type; /* plan type */ + JsonTablePlanJoinType join_type; /* join type (for joined plan only) */= + JsonTablePlan *plan1; /* first joined plan */ + JsonTablePlan *plan2; /* second joined plan */ + char *pathname; /* path name (for simple plan only) */ + int location; /* token location, or -1 if unknown */ +}; + /* * JsonTable - * untransformed representation of JSON_TABLE @@ -1676,7 +1705,7 @@ typedef struct JsonTable NodeTag type; JsonCommon *common; /* common JSON path syntax fields */ List *columns; /* list of JsonTableColumn */ - JsonTablePlanJoinType join_type; /* DEFAULT PLAN join type */ + JsonTablePlan *plan; /* join plan, if specified */ JsonBehavior *on_error; /* ON ERROR behavior, if specified */ Alias *alias; /* table alias in FROM clause */ bool lateral; /* does it have LATERAL prefix? */ diff --git a/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h b/src/include/nodes/primnodes.= h index 1aa3e01048..7884578cec 100644 --- a/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h +++ b/src/include/nodes/primnodes.h @@ -1475,9 +1475,9 @@ typedef struct JsonTableParentNode { NodeTag type; Const *path; /* jsonpath constant */ + char *name; /* path name */ Node *child; /* nested columns, if any */ bool outerJoin; /* outer or inner join for nested columns? */ - bool unionJoin; /* union or cross join for nested columns? */ int colMin; /* min column index in the resulting column list */ int colMax; /* max column index in the resulting column list */ bool errorOnError; /* ERROR/EMPTY ON ERROR behavior */ diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out b/src/test/regre= ss/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out index 0cd8f73c66..81f94e3c91 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/jsonb_sqljson.out @@ -1136,18 +1136,18 @@ SELECT * FROM ia int[] PATH '$', ta text[] PATH '$', jba jsonb[] PATH '$', - NESTED PATH '$[1]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[1]' AS p1 COLUMNS ( a1 int, - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p1 1" COLUMNS ( a11 text ), b1 text ), - NESTED PATH '$[2]' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[2]' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p2:1" COLUMNS ( a21 text ), - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p22 COLUMNS ( a22 text ) ) @@ -1187,7 +1187,7 @@ CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW public.jsonb_table_view AS "json_table".a21, "json_table".a22 FROM JSON_TABLE( - 'null'::jsonb, '$[*]' + 'null'::jsonb, '$[*]' AS json_table_path_1 PASSING 1 + 2 AS a, '"foo"'::json AS "b c" @@ -1218,34 +1218,35 @@ CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW public.jsonb_table_view AS= ia integer[] PATH '$', ta text[] PATH '$', jba jsonb[] PATH '$', - NESTED PATH '$[1]' + NESTED PATH '$[1]' AS p1 COLUMNS ( a1 integer PATH '$."a1"', b1 text PATH '$."b1"', - NESTED PATH '$[*]' + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p1 1" COLUMNS ( a11 text PATH '$."a11"' ) ), - NESTED PATH '$[2]' + NESTED PATH '$[2]' AS p2 COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$[*]' + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p2:1" COLUMNS ( a21 text PATH '$."a21"' ), - NESTED PATH '$[*]' + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p22 COLUMNS ( a22 text PATH '$."a22"' ) ) ) + PLAN (json_table_path_1 OUTER ((p1 OUTER "p1 1") UNION (p2 O= UTER ("p2:1" UNION p22)))) ) EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF, VERBOSE) SELECT * FROM jsonb_table_view; - = = = = = = = QUERY P= LAN = = = = = = = =20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------- + = = = = = = = = QUERY P= LAN = = = = = = = = =20 +------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------------------------------------------------------------- Table Function Scan on "json_table" Output: "json_table".id, "json_table".id2, "json_table"."int", "json_= table".text, "json_table"."char(4)", "json_table".bool, "json_table"."num= eric", "json_table".domain, "json_table".js, "json_table".jb, "json_table= ".jst, "json_table".jsc, "json_table".jsv, "json_table".jsb, "json_table"= =2Ejsbq, "json_table".aaa, "json_table".aaa1, "json_table".exists1, "json= _table".exists2, "json_table".exists3, "json_table".js2, "json_table".jsb= 2w, "json_table".jsb2q, "json_table".ia, "json_table".ta, "json_table".jb= a, "json_table".a1, "json_table".b1, "json_table".a11, "json_table".a21, = "json_table".a22 - Table Function Call: JSON_TABLE('null'::jsonb, '$[*]' PASSING 3 AS a,= '"foo"'::jsonb AS "b c" COLUMNS (id FOR ORDINALITY, id2 FOR ORDINALITY, = "int" integer PATH '$', text text PATH '$', "char(4)" character(4) PATH '= $', bool boolean PATH '$', "numeric" numeric PATH '$', domain jsonb_test_= domain PATH '$', js json PATH '$', jb jsonb PATH '$', jst text FORMAT JSO= N PATH '$', jsc character(4) FORMAT JSON PATH '$', jsv character varying(= 4) FORMAT JSON PATH '$', jsb jsonb PATH '$', jsbq jsonb PATH '$' OMIT QUO= TES, aaa integer PATH '$."aaa"', aaa1 integer PATH '$."aaa"', exists1 boo= lean EXISTS PATH '$."aaa"', exists2 integer EXISTS PATH '$."aaa"' TRUE ON= ERROR, exists3 text EXISTS PATH 'strict $."aaa"' UNKNOWN ON ERROR, js2 j= son PATH '$', jsb2w jsonb PATH '$' WITH UNCONDITIONAL WRAPPER, jsb2q json= b PATH '$' OMIT QUOTES, ia integer[] PATH '$', ta text[] PATH '$', jba js= onb[] PATH '$', NESTED PATH '$[1]' COLUMNS (a1 integer PATH '$."a1"', b1 = text PATH '$."b1"', NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS (a11 text PATH '$."a11"'))= , NESTED PATH '$[2]' COLUMNS ( NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS (a21 text PATH = '$."a21"'), NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS (a22 text PATH '$."a22"')))) + Table Function Call: JSON_TABLE('null'::jsonb, '$[*]' AS json_table_p= ath_1 PASSING 3 AS a, '"foo"'::jsonb AS "b c" COLUMNS (id FOR ORDINALITY,= id2 FOR ORDINALITY, "int" integer PATH '$', text text PATH '$', "char(4)= " character(4) PATH '$', bool boolean PATH '$', "numeric" numeric PATH '$= ', domain jsonb_test_domain PATH '$', js json PATH '$', jb jsonb PATH '$'= , jst text FORMAT JSON PATH '$', jsc character(4) FORMAT JSON PATH '$', j= sv character varying(4) FORMAT JSON PATH '$', jsb jsonb PATH '$', jsbq js= onb PATH '$' OMIT QUOTES, aaa integer PATH '$."aaa"', aaa1 integer PATH '= $."aaa"', exists1 boolean EXISTS PATH '$."aaa"', exists2 integer EXISTS P= ATH '$."aaa"' TRUE ON ERROR, exists3 text EXISTS PATH 'strict $."aaa"' UN= KNOWN ON ERROR, js2 json PATH '$', jsb2w jsonb PATH '$' WITH UNCONDITIONA= L WRAPPER, jsb2q jsonb PATH '$' OMIT QUOTES, ia integer[] PATH '$', ta te= xt[] PATH '$', jba jsonb[] PATH '$', NESTED PATH '$[1]' AS p1 COLUMNS (a1= integer PATH '$."a1"', b1 text PATH '$."b1"', NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p1 = 1" COLUMNS (a11 text PATH '$."a11"')), NESTED PATH '$[2]' AS p2 COLUMNS (= NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p2:1" COLUMNS (a21 text PATH '$."a21"'), NESTED P= ATH '$[*]' AS p22 COLUMNS (a22 text PATH '$."a22"'))) PLAN (json_table_pa= th_1 OUTER ((p1 OUTER "p1 1") UNION (p2 OUTER ("p2:1" UNION p22))))) (3 rows) =20 DROP VIEW jsonb_table_view; @@ -1337,13 +1338,49 @@ ERROR: cannot cast type boolean to jsonb LINE 1: ...ELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE(jsonb '"a"', '$' COLUMNS (a jsonb EX.= =2E. ^ -- JSON_TABLE: nested paths and plans +-- Should fail (JSON_TABLE columns shall contain explicit AS path +-- specifications if explicit PLAN clause is used) +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' -- AS <path name> required here + COLUMNS ( + foo int PATH '$' + ) + PLAN DEFAULT (UNION) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE expression +LINE 2: jsonb '[]', '$'=20 + ^ +DETAIL: JSON_TABLE columns shall contain explicit AS pathname specifica= tion if explicit PLAN clause is used +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' AS path1 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' COLUMNS ( -- AS <path name> required here + foo int PATH '$' + ) + ) + PLAN DEFAULT (UNION) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE expression +LINE 4: NESTED PATH '$' COLUMNS (=20 + ^ +DETAIL: JSON_TABLE columns shall contain explicit AS pathname specifica= tion if explicit PLAN clause is used -- Should fail (column names anf path names shall be distinct) SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( - jsonb '[]', '$' + jsonb '[]', '$' AS a COLUMNS ( - a int, - b text, - a jsonb + a int + ) +) jt; +ERROR: duplicate JSON_TABLE column name: a +HINT: JSON_TABLE path names and column names shall be distinct from one= another +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' AS a + COLUMNS ( + b int, + NESTED PATH '$' AS a + COLUMNS ( + c int + ) ) ) jt; ERROR: duplicate JSON_TABLE column name: a @@ -1352,10 +1389,9 @@ SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( jsonb '[]', '$' COLUMNS ( b int, - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS b COLUMNS ( - c int, - b text + c int ) ) ) jt; @@ -1364,22 +1400,209 @@ HINT: JSON_TABLE path names and column names sh= all be distinct from one another SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( jsonb '[]', '$' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS a COLUMNS ( b int ), NESTED PATH '$' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS a COLUMNS ( - c int, - b text + c int ) ) ) ) jt; -ERROR: duplicate JSON_TABLE column name: b +ERROR: duplicate JSON_TABLE column name: a HINT: JSON_TABLE path names and column names shall be distinct from one= another +-- JSON_TABLE: plan validation +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p1) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 12: PLAN (p1) + ^ +DETAIL: path name mismatch: expected p0 but p1 is given +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 4: NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p1 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER p3) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 4: NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p1 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 UNION p1 UNION p11) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 12: PLAN (p0 UNION p1 UNION p11) + ^ +DETAIL: expected INNER or OUTER JSON_TABLE plan node +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER (p1 CROSS p13)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 8: NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p2 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER (p1 CROSS p2)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 5: NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p11 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 UNION p11) CROSS p2)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 12: PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 UNION p11) CROSS p2)) + ^ +DETAIL: plan node contains some extra or duplicate sibling nodes +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER p11) CROSS p2)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 6: NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p12 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS p2)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE plan +LINE 9: NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ^ +DETAIL: plan node for nested path p21 was not found in plan +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', 'strict $[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS (p2 INNER p21))) +) jt; + bar | foo | baz=20 +-----+-----+----- +(0 rows) + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', 'strict $[*]' -- without root path name + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS (p2 INNER p21)) +) jt; +ERROR: invalid JSON_TABLE expression +LINE 2: jsonb 'null', 'strict $[*]'=20 + ^ +DETAIL: JSON_TABLE columns shall contain explicit AS pathname specifica= tion if explicit PLAN clause is used -- JSON_TABLE: plan execution CREATE TEMP TABLE jsonb_table_test (js jsonb); INSERT INTO jsonb_table_test @@ -1397,12 +1620,12 @@ select from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) ) jt; n | a | b | c =20 @@ -1426,12 +1649,12 @@ select from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (outer, union) ) jt; @@ -1450,18 +1673,78 @@ from 4 | -1 | 2 | =20 (11 rows) =20 +-- specific plan (p outer (pb union pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pb union pc)) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c =20 +---+----+---+---- + 1 | 1 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | 1 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | =20 + 2 | 2 | | 10 + 2 | 2 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | | 20 + 3 | 3 | 1 | =20 + 3 | 3 | 2 | =20 + 4 | -1 | 1 | =20 + 4 | -1 | 2 | =20 +(11 rows) + +-- specific plan (p outer (pc union pb)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pc union pb)) + ) jt; + n | a | c | b=20 +---+----+----+--- + 1 | 1 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | 10 | =20 + 2 | 2 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | 20 | =20 + 2 | 2 | | 1 + 2 | 2 | | 2 + 2 | 2 | | 3 + 3 | 3 | | 1 + 3 | 3 | | 2 + 4 | -1 | | 1 + 4 | -1 | | 2 +(11 rows) + -- default plan (inner, union) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (inner) ) jt; @@ -1479,18 +1762,47 @@ from 4 | -1 | 2 | =20 (10 rows) =20 +-- specific plan (p inner (pb union pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p inner (pb union pc)) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c =20 +---+----+---+---- + 2 | 2 | 1 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | =20 + 2 | 2 | | 10 + 2 | 2 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | | 20 + 3 | 3 | 1 | =20 + 3 | 3 | 2 | =20 + 4 | -1 | 1 | =20 + 4 | -1 | 2 | =20 +(10 rows) + -- default plan (inner, cross) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (cross, inner) ) jt; @@ -1507,18 +1819,46 @@ from 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 (9 rows) =20 +-- specific plan (p inner (pb cross pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p inner (pb cross pc)) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c =20 +---+---+---+---- + 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 1 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 2 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 3 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 +(9 rows) + -- default plan (outer, cross) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (outer, cross) ) jt; @@ -1538,6 +1878,90 @@ from 4 | -1 | | =20 (12 rows) =20 +-- specific plan (p outer (pb cross pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pb cross pc)) + ) jt; + n | a | b | c =20 +---+----+---+---- + 1 | 1 | | =20 + 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 1 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 1 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 2 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 2 | 20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 10 + 2 | 2 | 3 | =20 + 2 | 2 | 3 | 20 + 3 | 3 | | =20 + 4 | -1 | | =20 +(12 rows) + +select + jt.*, b1 + 100 as b +from + json_table (jsonb + '[ + {"a": 1, "b": [[1, 10], [2], [3, 30, 300]], "c": [1, null, 2]}, + {"a": 2, "b": [10, 20], "c": [1, null, 2]}, + {"x": "3", "b": [11, 22, 33, 44]} + ]', + '$[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on error, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( + b text format json path '$', + nested path 'strict $[*]' as pb1 columns ( + b1 int path '$' + ) + ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( + c text format json path '$', + nested path 'strict $[*]' as pc1 columns ( + c1 int path '$' + ) + ) + ) + --plan default(outer, cross) + plan(p outer ((pb inner pb1) cross (pc outer pc1))) + ) jt; + n | a | b | b1 | c | c1 | b =20 +---+---+--------------+-----+------+----+----- + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 1 | 1 | | 101 + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 1 | null | | 101 + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 1 | 2 | | 101 + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 10 | 1 | | 110 + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 10 | null | | 110 + 1 | 1 | [1, 10] | 10 | 2 | | 110 + 1 | 1 | [2] | 2 | 1 | | 102 + 1 | 1 | [2] | 2 | null | | 102 + 1 | 1 | [2] | 2 | 2 | | 102 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 3 | 1 | | 103 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 3 | null | | 103 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 3 | 2 | | 103 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 30 | 1 | | 130 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 30 | null | | 130 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 30 | 2 | | 130 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 300 | 1 | | 400 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 300 | null | | 400 + 1 | 1 | [3, 30, 300] | 300 | 2 | | 400 + 2 | 2 | | | | | =20 + 3 | | | | | | =20 +(20 rows) + -- Should succeed (JSON arguments are passed to root and nested paths) SELECT * FROM diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql b/src/test/regress/sq= l/jsonb_sqljson.sql index cd97ff7f46..be2d65b3ff 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/jsonb_sqljson.sql @@ -414,18 +414,18 @@ SELECT * FROM ta text[] PATH '$', jba jsonb[] PATH '$', =20 - NESTED PATH '$[1]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[1]' AS p1 COLUMNS ( a1 int, - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p1 1" COLUMNS ( a11 text ), b1 text ), - NESTED PATH '$[2]' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[2]' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS "p2:1" COLUMNS ( a21 text ), - NESTED PATH '$[*]' COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$[*]' AS p22 COLUMNS ( a22 text ) ) @@ -478,13 +478,42 @@ SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE(jsonb '"a"', '$' COLUMNS (= a jsonb EXISTS PATH '$.a')); =20 -- JSON_TABLE: nested paths and plans =20 +-- Should fail (JSON_TABLE columns shall contain explicit AS path +-- specifications if explicit PLAN clause is used) +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' -- AS <path name> required here + COLUMNS ( + foo int PATH '$' + ) + PLAN DEFAULT (UNION) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' AS path1 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' COLUMNS ( -- AS <path name> required here + foo int PATH '$' + ) + ) + PLAN DEFAULT (UNION) +) jt; + -- Should fail (column names anf path names shall be distinct) SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( - jsonb '[]', '$' + jsonb '[]', '$' AS a + COLUMNS ( + a int + ) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb '[]', '$' AS a COLUMNS ( - a int, - b text, - a jsonb + b int, + NESTED PATH '$' AS a + COLUMNS ( + c int + ) ) ) jt; =20 @@ -492,10 +521,9 @@ SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( jsonb '[]', '$' COLUMNS ( b int, - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS b COLUMNS ( - c int, - b text + c int ) ) ) jt; @@ -503,21 +531,176 @@ SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( jsonb '[]', '$' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS a COLUMNS ( b int ), NESTED PATH '$' COLUMNS ( - NESTED PATH '$' + NESTED PATH '$' AS a COLUMNS ( - c int, - b text + c int ) ) ) ) jt; =20 +-- JSON_TABLE: plan validation + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p1) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER p3) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 UNION p1 UNION p11) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER (p1 CROSS p13)) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER (p1 CROSS p2)) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 UNION p11) CROSS p2)) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER p11) CROSS p2)) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', '$[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS p2)) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', 'strict $[*]' AS p0 + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN (p0 OUTER ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS (p2 INNER p21))) +) jt; + +SELECT * FROM JSON_TABLE( + jsonb 'null', 'strict $[*]' -- without root path name + COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p1 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p11 COLUMNS ( foo int ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p12 COLUMNS ( bar int ) + ), + NESTED PATH '$' AS p2 COLUMNS ( + NESTED PATH '$' AS p21 COLUMNS ( baz int ) + ) + ) + PLAN ((p1 INNER (p12 CROSS p11)) CROSS (p2 INNER p21)) +) jt; + -- JSON_TABLE: plan execution =20 CREATE TEMP TABLE jsonb_table_test (js jsonb); @@ -538,12 +721,12 @@ select from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) ) jt; =20 @@ -553,64 +736,174 @@ select from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (outer, union) ) jt; =20 +-- specific plan (p outer (pb union pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pb union pc)) + ) jt; + +-- specific plan (p outer (pc union pb)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pc union pb)) + ) jt; + -- default plan (inner, union) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (inner) ) jt; =20 +-- specific plan (p inner (pb union pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p inner (pb union pc)) + ) jt; + -- default plan (inner, cross) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (cross, inner) ) jt; =20 +-- specific plan (p inner (pb cross pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p inner (pb cross pc)) + ) jt; + -- default plan (outer, cross) select jt.* from jsonb_table_test jtt, json_table ( - jtt.js,'strict $[*]' + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p columns ( n for ordinality, a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, - nested path 'strict $.b[*]' columns ( b int path '$' ), - nested path 'strict $.c[*]' columns ( c int path '$' ) + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) ) plan default (outer, cross) ) jt; =20 +-- specific plan (p outer (pb cross pc)) +select + jt.* +from + jsonb_table_test jtt, + json_table ( + jtt.js,'strict $[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on empty, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( b int path '$' ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( c int path '$' ) + ) + plan (p outer (pb cross pc)) + ) jt; + + +select + jt.*, b1 + 100 as b +from + json_table (jsonb + '[ + {"a": 1, "b": [[1, 10], [2], [3, 30, 300]], "c": [1, null, 2]}, + {"a": 2, "b": [10, 20], "c": [1, null, 2]}, + {"x": "3", "b": [11, 22, 33, 44]} + ]', + '$[*]' as p + columns ( + n for ordinality, + a int path 'lax $.a' default -1 on error, + nested path 'strict $.b[*]' as pb columns ( + b text format json path '$', + nested path 'strict $[*]' as pb1 columns ( + b1 int path '$' + ) + ), + nested path 'strict $.c[*]' as pc columns ( + c text format json path '$', + nested path 'strict $[*]' as pc1 columns ( + c1 int path '$' + ) + ) + ) + --plan default(outer, cross) + plan(p outer ((pb inner pb1) cross (pc outer pc1))) + ) jt; =20 -- Should succeed (JSON arguments are passed to root and nested paths) SELECT * diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typede= fs.list index 27cf806043..38cb738c1a 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -1237,7 +1237,9 @@ JsonTableColumnType JsonTableContext JsonTableJoinState JsonTableParentNode +JsonTablePlan JsonTablePlanJoinType +JsonTablePlanType JsonTableScanState JsonTableSiblingNode JsonTokenType --=20 2.25.4 --------------5BB5E3CCDF424A5E7F475161-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. @ 2026-04-20 07:20 Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 0 siblings, 0 replies; 402+ messages in thread From: Antonin Houska @ 2026-04-20 07:20 UTC (permalink / raw) Although REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses replication slots, there is no concern that the slot will leak data of other users because the MAINTAIN privilege on the table is required anyway. The REPLICATION attribute is also not needed to prevent REPACK from stealing slots from logical replication, since commit e76d8c749c introduces a limit on the maximum number of slots used by REPACK. --- src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c index b17edd771e2..e4a4860805b 100644 --- a/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c +++ b/src/backend/commands/repack_worker.c @@ -214,7 +214,6 @@ repack_setup_logical_decoding(Oid relid) /* * Make sure we can use logical decoding. */ - CheckSlotPermissions(); CheckLogicalDecodingRequirements(true); /* -- 2.47.3 --=-=-=-- ^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 402+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-20 07:20 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 402+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-04-02 06:02 [PATCH] Asymmetric partitionwise join. Andrey Lepikhov <a.lepikhov@postgrespro.ru> 2021-09-13 22:03 [PATCH 3/4] JSON_TABLE PLAN DEFAULT clause Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at> 2026-04-20 07:20 [PATCH] Do not check the REPLICATION attribute when running REPACK. Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox