agora inbox for [email protected]  

help / color / mirror / Atom feed

[PATCH v16 7/8] Row pattern recognition patch (tests).
128+ messages / 2 participants
[nested] [flat]

* [PATCH v16 7/8] Row pattern recognition patch (tests).
@ 2024-04-12 06:49  Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Tatsuo Ishii @ 2024-04-12 06:49 UTC (permalink / raw)

---
 src/test/regress/expected/rpr.out  | 821 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 src/test/regress/parallel_schedule |   2 +-
 src/test/regress/sql/rpr.sql       | 392 ++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 1214 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 src/test/regress/expected/rpr.out
 create mode 100644 src/test/regress/sql/rpr.sql

diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/rpr.out b/src/test/regress/expected/rpr.out
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e8998ebf45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/regress/expected/rpr.out
@@ -0,0 +1,821 @@
+--
+-- Test for row pattern definition clause
+--
+CREATE TEMP TABLE stock (
+       company TEXT,
+       tdate DATE,
+       price INTEGER
+);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-01', 100);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-02', 200);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-03', 150);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-04', 140);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-05', 150);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-06', 90);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-07', 110);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-08', 130);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-09', 120);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-10', 130);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-01', 50);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-02', 2000);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-03', 1500);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-04', 1400);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-05', 1500);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-06', 60);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-07', 1100);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-08', 1300);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-09', 1200);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-10', 1300);
+SELECT * FROM stock;
+ company  |   tdate    | price 
+----------+------------+-------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300
+(20 rows)
+
+-- basic test using PREV
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | nth_second 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140 | 07-02-2023
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        120 | 07-07-2023
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400 | 07-02-2023
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1200 | 07-07-2023
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- basic test using PREV. UP appears twice
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+ UP+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | nth_second 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        150 | 07-02-2023
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        130 | 07-07-2023
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1500 | 07-02-2023
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1300 | 07-07-2023
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- basic test using PREV. Use '*'
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP* DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | nth_second 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140 | 07-02-2023
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |         150 |         90 | 07-06-2023
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |         110 |        120 | 07-08-2023
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400 | 07-02-2023
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |        1500 |         60 | 07-06-2023
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |        1100 |       1200 | 07-08-2023
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- basic test with none greedy pattern
+SELECT company, tdate, price, count(*) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A A A)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price >= 140 AND price <= 150
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | count 
+----------+------------+-------+-------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |     0
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |     0
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |     3
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |      
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |      
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |     0
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |     0
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |     0
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |     0
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |     0
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |     0
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |     0
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |     0
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |     0
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |     0
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |     0
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |     0
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |     0
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |     0
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |     0
+(20 rows)
+
+-- last_value() should remain consistent
+SELECT company, tdate, price, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |        140
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |           
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |        120
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |           
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |       1400
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |           
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |       1200
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |           
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- omit "START" in DEFINE but it is ok because "START AS TRUE" is
+-- implicitly defined. per spec.
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | nth_second 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140 | 07-02-2023
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        120 | 07-07-2023
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            | 
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400 | 07-02-2023
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1200 | 07-07-2023
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            | 
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- the first row start with less than or equal to 100
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  LOWPRICE AS price <= 100,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        120
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1200
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- second row raises 120%
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  LOWPRICE AS price <= 100,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price) * 1.2,
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- using NEXT
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UPDOWN)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UPDOWN AS price > PREV(price) AND price > NEXT(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        200
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |         140 |        150
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |         110 |        130
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       2000
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |        1400 |       1500
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |        1100 |       1300
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UPDOWN)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UPDOWN AS price > PREV(price) AND price > NEXT(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        200
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |         140 |        150
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |         110 |        130
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       2000
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |        1400 |       1500
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |        1100 |       1300
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- match everything
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS TRUE
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        130
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |           
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1300
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |           
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |           
+(20 rows)
+
+-- backtracking with reclassification of rows
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+ B+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price > 100,
+  B AS price > 100
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 | 07-02-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 | 07-07-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 | 07-02-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 | 07-07-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- backtracking with reclassification of rows
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+ B+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price > 100,
+  B AS price > 100
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 | 07-02-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 | 07-03-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 | 07-04-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             | 
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 | 07-07-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 | 07-08-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 | 07-09-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 | 07-02-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 | 07-03-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 | 07-04-2023  | 07-05-2023
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             | 
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 | 07-07-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 | 07-08-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 | 07-09-2023  | 07-10-2023
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             | 
+(20 rows)
+
+-- ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND offset FOLLOWING
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w,
+ count(*) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND 2 FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | count 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+-------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 | 07-01-2023  | 07-03-2023 |     3
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 | 07-04-2023  | 07-06-2023 |     3
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 | 07-07-2023  | 07-09-2023 |     3
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            |      
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            |     0
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 | 07-01-2023  | 07-03-2023 |     3
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 | 07-04-2023  | 07-06-2023 |     3
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 | 07-07-2023  | 07-09-2023 |     3
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            |      
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            |     0
+(20 rows)
+
+--
+-- Aggregates
+--
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price,
+ first_value(price) OVER w,
+ last_value(price) OVER w,
+ max(price) OVER w,
+ min(price) OVER w,
+ sum(price) OVER w,
+ avg(price) OVER w,
+ count(price) OVER w
+FROM stock
+WINDOW w AS (
+PARTITION BY company
+ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+INITIAL
+PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+DEFINE
+START AS TRUE,
+UP AS price > PREV(price),
+DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | max  | min | sum  |          avg          | count 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------+-----+------+-----------------------+-------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140 |  200 | 100 |  590 |  147.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        120 |  130 |  90 |  450 |  112.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400 | 2000 |  50 | 4950 | 1237.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1200 | 1300 |  60 | 3660 |  915.0000000000000000 |     4
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |      
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            |      |     |      |                       |     0
+(20 rows)
+
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price,
+ first_value(price) OVER w,
+ last_value(price) OVER w,
+ max(price) OVER w,
+ min(price) OVER w,
+ sum(price) OVER w,
+ avg(price) OVER w,
+ count(price) OVER w
+FROM stock
+WINDOW w AS (
+PARTITION BY company
+ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+INITIAL
+PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+DEFINE
+START AS TRUE,
+UP AS price > PREV(price),
+DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ company  |   tdate    | price | first_value | last_value | max  | min  | sum  |          avg          | count 
+----------+------------+-------+-------------+------------+------+------+------+-----------------------+-------
+ company1 | 07-01-2023 |   100 |         100 |        140 |  200 |  100 |  590 |  147.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company1 | 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-04-2023 |   140 |         140 |         90 |  150 |   90 |  380 |  126.6666666666666667 |     3
+ company1 | 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-06-2023 |    90 |          90 |        120 |  130 |   90 |  450 |  112.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company1 | 07-07-2023 |   110 |         110 |        120 |  130 |  110 |  360 |  120.0000000000000000 |     3
+ company1 | 07-08-2023 |   130 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-09-2023 |   120 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company1 | 07-10-2023 |   130 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-01-2023 |    50 |          50 |       1400 | 2000 |   50 | 4950 | 1237.5000000000000000 |     4
+ company2 | 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-04-2023 |  1400 |        1400 |         60 | 1500 |   60 | 2960 |  986.6666666666666667 |     3
+ company2 | 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-06-2023 |    60 |          60 |       1200 | 1300 |   60 | 3660 |  915.0000000000000000 |     4
+ company2 | 07-07-2023 |  1100 |        1100 |       1200 | 1300 | 1100 | 3600 | 1200.0000000000000000 |     3
+ company2 | 07-08-2023 |  1300 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-09-2023 |  1200 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+ company2 | 07-10-2023 |  1300 |             |            |      |      |      |                       |     0
+(20 rows)
+
+-- JOIN case
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t1 (i int, v1 int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t2 (j int, v2 int);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,10);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,11);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,12);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,10);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,11);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,12);
+SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.v1 <= 11 AND t2.v2 <= 11;
+ i | v1 | j | v2 
+---+----+---+----
+ 1 | 10 | 2 | 10
+ 1 | 10 | 2 | 11
+ 1 | 11 | 2 | 10
+ 1 | 11 | 2 | 11
+(4 rows)
+
+SELECT *, count(*) OVER w FROM t1, t2
+WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY t1.i
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A)
+ DEFINE
+ A AS v1 <= 11 AND v2 <= 11
+);
+ i | v1 | j | v2 | count 
+---+----+---+----+-------
+ 1 | 10 | 2 | 10 |     1
+ 1 | 10 | 2 | 11 |     1
+ 1 | 10 | 2 | 12 |     0
+ 1 | 11 | 2 | 10 |     1
+ 1 | 11 | 2 | 11 |     1
+ 1 | 11 | 2 | 12 |     0
+ 1 | 12 | 2 | 10 |     0
+ 1 | 12 | 2 | 11 |     0
+ 1 | 12 | 2 | 12 |     0
+(9 rows)
+
+-- WITH case
+WITH wstock AS (
+  SELECT * FROM stock WHERE tdate < '2023-07-08'
+)
+SELECT tdate, price,
+first_value(tdate) OVER w,
+count(*) OVER w
+ FROM wstock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+   tdate    | price | first_value | count 
+------------+-------+-------------+-------
+ 07-01-2023 |   100 | 07-01-2023  |     4
+ 07-02-2023 |   200 |             |      
+ 07-03-2023 |   150 |             |      
+ 07-04-2023 |   140 |             |      
+ 07-05-2023 |   150 |             |     0
+ 07-06-2023 |    90 |             |     0
+ 07-07-2023 |   110 |             |     0
+ 07-01-2023 |    50 | 07-01-2023  |     4
+ 07-02-2023 |  2000 |             |      
+ 07-03-2023 |  1500 |             |      
+ 07-04-2023 |  1400 |             |      
+ 07-05-2023 |  1500 |             |     0
+ 07-06-2023 |    60 |             |     0
+ 07-07-2023 |  1100 |             |     0
+(14 rows)
+
+--
+-- Error cases
+--
+-- row pattern definition variable name must not appear more than once
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price),
+  UP AS price > PREV(price)
+);
+ERROR:  syntax error at or near "ORDER"
+LINE 6:  ORDER BY tdate
+         ^
+-- pattern variable name must appear in DEFINE
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+ END)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ERROR:  syntax error at or near "END"
+LINE 8:  PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+ END)
+                                  ^
+-- FRAME must start at current row when row patttern recognition is used
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ERROR:  FRAME must start at current row when row patttern recognition is used
+-- SEEK is not supported
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ SEEK
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+ERROR:  SEEK is not supported
+LINE 8:  SEEK
+         ^
+HINT:  Use INITIAL.
diff --git a/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule b/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
index 675c567617..0ca2713c3d 100644
--- a/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
+++ b/src/test/regress/parallel_schedule
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ test: publication subscription
 # Another group of parallel tests
 # select_views depends on create_view
 # ----------
-test: select_views portals_p2 foreign_key cluster dependency guc bitmapops combocid tsearch tsdicts foreign_data window xmlmap functional_deps advisory_lock indirect_toast equivclass
+test: select_views portals_p2 foreign_key cluster dependency guc bitmapops combocid tsearch tsdicts foreign_data window xmlmap functional_deps advisory_lock indirect_toast equivclass rpr
 
 # ----------
 # Another group of parallel tests (JSON related)
diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/rpr.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/rpr.sql
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0a69cc0e11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/regress/sql/rpr.sql
@@ -0,0 +1,392 @@
+--
+-- Test for row pattern definition clause
+--
+
+CREATE TEMP TABLE stock (
+       company TEXT,
+       tdate DATE,
+       price INTEGER
+);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-01', 100);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-02', 200);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-03', 150);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-04', 140);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-05', 150);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-06', 90);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-07', 110);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-08', 130);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-09', 120);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company1', '2023-07-10', 130);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-01', 50);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-02', 2000);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-03', 1500);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-04', 1400);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-05', 1500);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-06', 60);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-07', 1100);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-08', 1300);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-09', 1200);
+INSERT INTO stock VALUES ('company2', '2023-07-10', 1300);
+
+SELECT * FROM stock;
+
+-- basic test using PREV
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- basic test using PREV. UP appears twice
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+ UP+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- basic test using PREV. Use '*'
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP* DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- basic test with none greedy pattern
+SELECT company, tdate, price, count(*) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A A A)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price >= 140 AND price <= 150
+);
+
+-- last_value() should remain consistent
+SELECT company, tdate, price, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- omit "START" in DEFINE but it is ok because "START AS TRUE" is
+-- implicitly defined. per spec.
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w,
+ nth_value(tdate, 2) OVER w AS nth_second
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- the first row start with less than or equal to 100
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  LOWPRICE AS price <= 100,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- second row raises 120%
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (LOWPRICE UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  LOWPRICE AS price <= 100,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price) * 1.2,
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- using NEXT
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UPDOWN)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UPDOWN AS price > PREV(price) AND price > NEXT(price)
+);
+
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UPDOWN)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UPDOWN AS price > PREV(price) AND price > NEXT(price)
+);
+
+-- match everything
+
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS TRUE
+);
+
+-- backtracking with reclassification of rows
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+ B+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price > 100,
+  B AS price > 100
+);
+
+-- backtracking with reclassification of rows
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A+ B+)
+ DEFINE
+  A AS price > 100,
+  B AS price > 100
+);
+
+-- ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND offset FOLLOWING
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(tdate) OVER w, last_value(tdate) OVER w,
+ count(*) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND 2 FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+--
+-- Aggregates
+--
+
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price,
+ first_value(price) OVER w,
+ last_value(price) OVER w,
+ max(price) OVER w,
+ min(price) OVER w,
+ sum(price) OVER w,
+ avg(price) OVER w,
+ count(price) OVER w
+FROM stock
+WINDOW w AS (
+PARTITION BY company
+ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+AFTER MATCH SKIP PAST LAST ROW
+INITIAL
+PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+DEFINE
+START AS TRUE,
+UP AS price > PREV(price),
+DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- using AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+SELECT company, tdate, price,
+ first_value(price) OVER w,
+ last_value(price) OVER w,
+ max(price) OVER w,
+ min(price) OVER w,
+ sum(price) OVER w,
+ avg(price) OVER w,
+ count(price) OVER w
+FROM stock
+WINDOW w AS (
+PARTITION BY company
+ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+INITIAL
+PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+DEFINE
+START AS TRUE,
+UP AS price > PREV(price),
+DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- JOIN case
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t1 (i int, v1 int);
+CREATE TEMP TABLE t2 (j int, v2 int);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,10);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,11);
+INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1,12);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,10);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,11);
+INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2,12);
+
+SELECT * FROM t1, t2 WHERE t1.v1 <= 11 AND t2.v2 <= 11;
+
+SELECT *, count(*) OVER w FROM t1, t2
+WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY t1.i
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (A)
+ DEFINE
+ A AS v1 <= 11 AND v2 <= 11
+);
+
+-- WITH case
+WITH wstock AS (
+  SELECT * FROM stock WHERE tdate < '2023-07-08'
+)
+SELECT tdate, price,
+first_value(tdate) OVER w,
+count(*) OVER w
+ FROM wstock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+--
+-- Error cases
+--
+
+-- row pattern definition variable name must not appear more than once
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price),
+  UP AS price > PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- pattern variable name must appear in DEFINE
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+ END)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- FRAME must start at current row when row patttern recognition is used
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN UNBOUNDED PRECEDING AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ INITIAL
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
+
+-- SEEK is not supported
+SELECT company, tdate, price, first_value(price) OVER w, last_value(price) OVER w
+ FROM stock
+ WINDOW w AS (
+ PARTITION BY company
+ ORDER BY tdate
+ ROWS BETWEEN CURRENT ROW AND UNBOUNDED FOLLOWING
+ AFTER MATCH SKIP TO NEXT ROW
+ SEEK
+ PATTERN (START UP+ DOWN+)
+ DEFINE
+  START AS TRUE,
+  UP AS price > PREV(price),
+  DOWN AS price < PREV(price)
+);
-- 
2.25.1


----Next_Part(Fri_Apr_12_16_09_08_2024_262)--
Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline;
 filename="v16-0008-Allow-to-print-raw-parse-tree.patch"



^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush'
@ 2026-04-07 13:11  Andres Freund <[email protected]>
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 128+ messages in thread

From: Andres Freund @ 2026-04-07 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)

The investigation into the negative test performance impact of 7e8aeb9e483
lead to discovering that there are a few issues with WAIT FOR.

This commit is just a minimal fix to prevent hangs in standby_flush mode, due
to WAIT FOR ... 'standby_flush' seeing a 0 LSN if a newly started walreceiver
does not receive any writes, because the stanby is already caught up.

There are several other issues and this is isn't necessarily the best fix. But
this way we get the hangs out of the way.

Reported-by: Tom Lane <[email protected]>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/zqbppucpmkeqecfy4s5kscnru4tbk6khp3ozqz6ad2zijz354k@w4bdf4z3wqoz
---
 src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c      | 2 --
 src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c | 1 +
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
index a437273cf9a..09fde92bfd7 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiver.c
@@ -242,8 +242,6 @@ WalReceiverMain(const void *startup_data, size_t startup_data_len)
 
 	SpinLockRelease(&walrcv->mutex);
 
-	pg_atomic_write_u64(&WalRcv->writtenUpto, 0);
-
 	/* Arrange to clean up at walreceiver exit */
 	on_shmem_exit(WalRcvDie, PointerGetDatum(&startpointTLI));
 
diff --git a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
index 4e03e721872..bd5d47be964 100644
--- a/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
+++ b/src/backend/replication/walreceiverfuncs.c
@@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ RequestXLogStreaming(TimeLineID tli, XLogRecPtr recptr, const char *conninfo,
 		walrcv->flushedUpto = recptr;
 		walrcv->receivedTLI = tli;
 		walrcv->latestChunkStart = recptr;
+		pg_atomic_write_u64(&walrcv->writtenUpto, recptr);
 	}
 	walrcv->receiveStart = recptr;
 	walrcv->receiveStartTLI = tli;
-- 
2.53.0.1.gb2826b52eb


--ags3ltqh73mz7p2n--





^ permalink  raw  reply  [nested|flat] 128+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-04-07 13:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 128+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-12 06:49 [PATCH v16 7/8] Row pattern recognition patch (tests). Tatsuo Ishii <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>
2026-04-07 13:11 [PATCH v1] Minimal fix for WAIT FOR ... MODE 'standby_flush' Andres Freund <[email protected]>

This inbox is served by agora; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox