From: Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:18:24 +0100
Message-ID: <00022218230105.10757@taubnessel.pcp.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C23C@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
References: <1B3D5E532D18D311861A00600865478C70C23C@exchange1.nt.maidstone.gov.uk>
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
>
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
Will those changes be in 7.0 final or is the "feature freeze" already
in effect? If you want, I'd be delighted to test pre-releases of your 7.0
driver.
BTW, did you read my other mail about BINARY field types? Any chance
that 7.0 could help me with that problem? For example, the LO type could be
reported as BINARY...
Regards,
Hakan
--
Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com
ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: hakan42@gmx.de, petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
In-Reply-To: <00022218230105.10757@taubnessel.pcp.local>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox