From: Taral <taral@cyberjunkie.com>
To: Aleksey Demakov <avd@gcom.ru>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ORB API
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1998 09:29:46 -0600
Message-ID: <000601be1175$f0ed9360$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d86onrst.fsf@avd.garsib.ru>
> I believe that ORBit is the best candidate, though it's not yet
> complete and its ability to interoperate with other implementations
> is to be proven. But unlike others it doesn't require egcs or
> OS thread support (omniORB). It is intended for real work, not
> for education (mico). It is in active development wich we can
> join to.
But does it fully support the basic CORBA 2.2 API *right now*? The point of
using mico was that we can easily switch ORBs later on since the 2.2 API is
so specific.
Example:
omniORB does not use the 2.2 perform_work()/run() functions, but instead has
an extension to the impl_is_ready() function. Although their implementation
is valid under 2.0, it is *not* valid under 2.2.
Taral
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: taral@cyberjunkie.com, avd@gcom.ru
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] ORB API
In-Reply-To: <000601be1175$f0ed9360$8a14f7d0@taral.dobiecenter.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox