pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedLast best version of the JDBC Driver?
5+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
@ 2000-02-22 13:27 Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hakan Tandogan @ 2000-02-22 13:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces
Hi,
Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the last
best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was about to
be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the CVS
archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15. September.
Just curious,
Hakan
--
Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com
ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
@ 2000-02-22 16:39 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-22 17:18 ` RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
2000-02-23 16:12 ` Re: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-22 16:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Hakan Tandogan' <hakan42@gmx.de>; pgsql-interfaces
The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
included into CVS.
PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.
Peter
--
Peter Mount
Enterprise Support
Maidstone Borough Council
Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
-----Original Message-----
From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42@gmx.de]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Hi,
Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
last
best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
about to
be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
CVS
archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.
September.
Just curious,
Hakan
--
Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com
ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
************
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
2000-02-22 16:39 RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-22 17:18 ` Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Hakan Tandogan @ 2000-02-22 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; pgsql-interfaces
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
>
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
Will those changes be in 7.0 final or is the "feature freeze" already
in effect? If you want, I'd be delighted to test pre-releases of your 7.0
driver.
BTW, did you read my other mail about BINARY field types? Any chance
that 7.0 could help me with that problem? For example, the LO type could be
reported as BINARY...
Regards,
Hakan
--
Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com
ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
2000-02-22 16:39 RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
@ 2000-02-23 16:12 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joe Shevland @ 2000-02-23 16:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Hakan Tandogan' <hakan42@gmx.de>; pgsql-interfaces
Peter,
Would you like some help on this :) ? Seems
you're fighting a battle alone when theres
no need... I can provide CVS etc. and binary
downloads, if you say the word... the only
problem is that it would be a .com.au domain
name, but I'd make sure I'm not complicit in
any advertising etc... Also :P I'm dying
to get my hands on 7.0 :)
Cheers
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Hakan Tandogan'" <hakan42@gmx.de>; <pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
>
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
>
> PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
> last
> best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
> about to
> be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
> CVS
> archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.
> September.
>
>
> Just curious,
> Hakan
>
> --
> Hakan Tandogan hakan@iconsult.com
>
> ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
> Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
>
> ************
>
> ************
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
@ 2000-02-23 09:11 Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Peter Mount @ 2000-02-23 09:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Joe Shevland' <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>; Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>; 'Hakan Tandogan' <hakan42@gmx.de>; pgsql-interfaces
Joe, the CVS is at postgresql.org already :-)
Actually, I'm going to try to get some time of work next week (I need
the break), so if I can, I'm going to hit it with a vengence. Most of
what I have here is done, it just needs tidying up and testing.
Thanks for the offer however.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Joe Shevland [mailto:shevlandj@kpi.com.au]
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2000 4:12 PM
To: Peter Mount; 'Hakan Tandogan'; pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Peter,
Would you like some help on this :) ? Seems
you're fighting a battle alone when theres
no need... I can provide CVS etc. and binary
downloads, if you say the word... the only
problem is that it would be a .com.au domain
name, but I'd make sure I'm not complicit in
any advertising etc... Also :P I'm dying
to get my hands on 7.0 :)
Cheers
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Mount" <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
To: "'Hakan Tandogan'" <hakan42@gmx.de>;
<pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 8:39 AM
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
>
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other
nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
>
> PS: The org.postgresql change has been done, but not fully tested.
>
> Peter
>
> --
> Peter Mount
> Enterprise Support
> Maidstone Borough Council
> Any views stated are my own, and not those of Maidstone Borough
Council.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hakan Tandogan [mailto:hakan42@gmx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2000 1:28 PM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
> Subject: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Is the version of the JDBC driver I'm getting via CVS really the
> last
> best one? I remember reading on the hackers list that the driver was
> about to
> be repackaged to "org.postgresql", but I don't see this change in the
> CVS
> archive. In fact, the last timestamp change I'm seeing is from 15.
> September.
>
>
> Just curious,
> Hakan
>
> --
> Hakan Tandogan
hakan@iconsult.com
>
> ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
> Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen Fax.:
+49-9131-9047-77
>
> "Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"
>
> ************
>
> ************
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-23 16:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-22 13:27 Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
2000-02-22 16:39 RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
2000-02-22 17:18 ` Hakan Tandogan <hakan42@gmx.de>
2000-02-23 16:12 ` Joe Shevland <shevlandj@kpi.com.au>
2000-02-23 09:11 RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox