pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedBeta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
3+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
@ 2003-03-10 23:36 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2003-03-11 00:30 ` Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
2003-03-11 02:43 ` Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Lane @ 2003-03-10 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; +Cc: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> So, what should we do? Should we go another month or two and just wait
> until we have enough must-have features? While not waiting on specific
> features, it _is_ waiting for something to warrant a release. I guess
> the big question is whether we release on a scheduled-basis or a
> enough-features-basis.
"Enough features" is such a judgment call that no one can predict what
the schedule will be, if that's part of the decision.
I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
without good concrete arguments for doing so.
regards, tom lane
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
2003-03-10 23:36 Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2003-03-11 00:30 ` Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Joe Conway @ 2003-03-11 00:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Enough features" is such a judgment call that no one can predict what
> the schedule will be, if that's part of the decision.
>
> I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
> you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
> port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
> stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
> without good concrete arguments for doing so.
>
FWIW, if we're voting, I'd say:
1. on "firm date" vs "when feature x is ready": I vote "firm date" -- I
know that last August the firm beta start date motivated me to get some
things done that I would have dragged out without the scheduled cutoff.
2. June 1 beta cutoff sounds about right.
Joe
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign)
2003-03-10 23:36 Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
@ 2003-03-11 02:43 ` Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne @ 2003-03-11 02:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>; Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>; +Cc: Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> I had been leaning to May 1 beta, but am happy to switch to June 1 if
> you feel that makes an improvement in the odds of completing the Windows
> port. (I think it will also improve the odds of finishing this protocol
> stuff I've taken on...) I don't want to see it pushed further than that
> without good concrete arguments for doing so.
There really is no rush...
I'm well-versed in PostgreSQL, and even I haven't upgraded some of our
production servers to even 7.3 yet (thanks to pg_dump dependency
nightmare)..
BTW, so no-one conflicts, I'm doing up pg_get_triggerdef(oid) at the moment.
Once that's done, I'll be able to submit a redone psql \d output that
includes the trigger definition.
Cheers,
Chris
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-11 02:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-10 23:36 Beta Schedule (was Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign) Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
2003-03-11 00:30 ` Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>
2003-03-11 02:43 ` Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox