From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:23:06 -0400
Message-ID: <11010.1238030586@sss.pgh.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com>
References: <200807081502.58572.peter_e@gmx.net>
<20090325215034.GA3137@alvh.no-ip.org>
<18071eea0903251747x650baa68hd7800958be301985@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas Adam <thomas.adam22@gmail.com> writes:
> I find it amusing that "low traffic" implies some level of
> irrelevancy. What a load of tosh. This list has a purpose, it
> *serves* that purpose, and does so well.
Not counting this thread itself, since January 1 this list has had
22 posts, all but five of which were demonstrably off-topic (assuming
that that Javascript thread in January should have been on pgsql-jdbc).
Of the five, three were a single thread about ECPG, and the other two
were questions that went unanswered. So in other words, there's been
*one* effective, on-topic exchange in three months here, and a much
larger volume of stuff that should have gone somewhere else.
The list looks pretty moribund to me :-(.
regards, tom lane
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, thomas.adam22@gmail.com, alvherre@commandprompt.com, peter_e@gmx.net
Subject: Re: this mailing list is proposed to be retired
In-Reply-To: <11010.1238030586@sss.pgh.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox