From: Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Large objects names
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 1998 23:53:58 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <199808060353.XAA16595@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
Currently, large objects are stored internally as xinv### and xinx###.
I would like to rename this for 6.4 to be _lobject_### to prevent
namespace collisions, and make them clearer for administrators.
However, this may cause problems for backward compatability for large
object users. As I see there are going to be other new large object
things in 6.4, it may not be an issue.
Is is OK to rename them internally?
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: Large objects names
In-Reply-To: <199808060353.XAA16595@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox