From: Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>
To: maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
Cc: lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu
Cc: ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 1999 10:56:30 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <199910111656.KAA17620@biology.nmsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us>
References: <199910111543.LAA29508@candle.pha.pa.us>
> I hope we don't have a consensus on this. Long commands with
> underscores in them are certainly another sign of the coming
> apocalypse ;)
But if we keep symlinks to the existing names, is that OK?
Isn't the point to avoid naming conflicts. Symlinks won't help that,
surely.
I agree; underscores are a pain. If you must go this direction, I
suggest hyphens (-).
Cheers,
Brook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: brook@biology.nmsu.edu, maillist@candle.pha.pa.us, lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu, ser@perio.unlp.edu.ar, pgsql-hackers@postgreSQL.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)
In-Reply-To: <199910111656.KAA17620@biology.nmsu.edu>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox