From: J. T. Vermeulen <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: J. T. Vermeulen <jtv@cistron-office.nl>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: libpq++: combined patches based on 7.1b5
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:30:46 +0100
Message-ID: <20010312183045.T686@cistron.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <28065.984417520@sss.pgh.pa.us>
References: <20010312173756.S686@cistron.nl>
<28065.984417520@sss.pgh.pa.us>
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Yes. It's too late in the 7.1 cycle for anything except bug fixes,
> though (and even there, probably only critical fixes...)
I'm aware of that side--right now my worry is more whether 7.2 might be too
early.
Jeroen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: jtv@cistron-office.nl, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us
Subject: Re: libpq++: combined patches based on 7.1b5
In-Reply-To: <20010312183045.T686@cistron.nl>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox