pg.ddx.io pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org mailing list archive
help / color / mirror / Atom feedlibpq++ and libpqxx removed
6+ messages / 3 participants
[nested] [flat]
* libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 00:21 Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2002-08-22 00:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: pgsql-interfaces; +Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
(ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
let me know if there are any problems ...
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 01:58 Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
parent: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne @ 2002-08-22 01:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>; pgsql-interfaces; +Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
Chris
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
>
>
>
> they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
>
> let me know if there are any problems ...
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 01:59 Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
parent: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2002-08-22 01:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org, Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on
the current one until the new portal is in place ...
Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side?
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
> home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
>
> Chris
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
> >
> >
> >
> > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
> >
> > let me know if there are any problems ...
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> >
> > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> >
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 02:24 Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
parent: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vince Vielhaber @ 2002-08-22 02:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>; +Cc: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>; pgsql-interfaces; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should have such on
> the current one until the new portal is in place ...
>
> Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the left side?
Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup
has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
trying to tell you that for months.
>
> On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
>
> > Can we perhaps have very prominent linking to gborg from the postgresql.org
> > home page? Especially now that there's libpq++ and stuff on there?
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org
> > > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier
> > > Sent: Thursday, 22 August 2002 8:21 AM
> > > To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
> > > Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > > Subject: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > they are no longer on the central repository, but are on GBorg ... I've
> > > made the appropriate chagnes to configure and Makefiles to reflect the
> > > fact that libpq++ is no longer part of the central distribution, *but* I
> > > used 'cvs remove' to remove the files themselves, so that the old branches
> > > (ie. if we do a v7.2.2, we need it) still have access to the code ...
> > >
> > > let me know if there are any problems ...
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > > TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> > >
> > > http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
Vince.
--
==========================================================================
Vince Vielhaber -- KA8CSH email: vev@michvhf.com http://www.pop4.net
56K Nationwide Dialup from $16.00/mo at Pop4 Networking
http://www.camping-usa.com http://www.cloudninegifts.com
http://www.meanstreamradio.com http://www.unknown-artists.com
==========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 02:28 Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
parent: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne @ 2002-08-22 02:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>; Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>; +Cc: pgsql-interfaces; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed in such a way
as to not use image links at all. From all my experience in doing
websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea.
Chris
> > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should
> have such on
> > the current one until the new portal is in place ...
> >
> > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the
> left side?
>
> Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup
> has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
> The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
> trying to tell you that for months.
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ and libpqxx removed
@ 2002-08-22 02:36 Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
parent: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Marc G. Fournier @ 2002-08-22 02:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>; +Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>; pgsql-interfaces; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> Where can we see the new portal? Maybe it should be designed in such a way
> as to not use image links at all. From all my experience in doing
> websites - that'd be a _really_ good idea.
I don't believe we are using image links on the new portal ...
>
> Chris
>
> > > There will be on the new portal, but you are right, we should
> > have such on
> > > the current one until the new portal is in place ...
> > >
> > > Vince, can you add a link to it off the menus themselves on the
> > left side?
> >
> > Sure. Make me a button that matches the rest. That's what the holdup
> > has been for any changes. That's why I've been soliciting new designs.
> > The new portal isn't going to help in this regard either, I've been
> > trying to tell you that for months.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [nested|flat] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-08-22 02:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox mbox.gz follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-08-22 00:21 libpq++ and libpqxx removed Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
2002-08-22 01:58 ` Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
2002-08-22 01:59 ` Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
2002-08-22 02:24 ` Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>
2002-08-22 02:28 ` Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
2002-08-22 02:36 ` Marc G. Fournier <scrappy@hub.org>
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox