From: terry <tg5027@citlink.net>
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 15:25:42 -0400
Message-ID: <20020904185659.32F8D475530@postgresql.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGMEHLCOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>
References: <HKEIIDPFPDBMOMDLIEEGMEHLCOAA.iavor.raytchev@verysmall.org>
>> > >> Hm... In MS Access it is called 'Relations' which sounds kind
>> > >> of correct.
>> >
>> > Actually, the window is called "Relationships", not
>> > "Relations"....
>>
>> Correct. Was lazy to look it up. Does this change something?
Not really, I was just following up on the discussion about the
incorrect use of the term Relations by MS Access. I don't think that
Relationships is a bad tab label - except that it's a bit long for the
current size tabs :).
Access's Relationships are all placed on one canvas, regardless of
whether or not there are several independent diagrams present. If this
model is to be used by pgaccess, it would make just as much sense to
put 'Relationships' into the Database menu instead of a tab, since the
New, Open, and Design actions would not mean anything.
the-$0.02-of-an-old-Access-developer-wishing-the-best-to-pgaccess ...
terry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: tg5027@citlink.net
Subject: Re: the current 'schema' tab - renaming ideas
In-Reply-To: <20020904185659.32F8D475530@postgresql.org>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox