From: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
To: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 11:28:09 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEBGKFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> > Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> > Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> > cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> > across transactions.
> >
> > Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.
>
> I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
> for cursor related operations if there's no objection.
Are you suggesting removing FETCH LAST _and_ MOVE LAST?. I think MOVE
LAST works well.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, Inoue@tpf.co.jp, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
In-Reply-To: <200301121628.h0CGS9T17109@candle.pha.pa.us>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox