From: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
To: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 01:12:19 +0900
Message-ID: <EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEBGKFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E1CEA18.18E921A0@tpf.co.jp>
> Honestly I'm not so enthusiastic about scrollable cursors.
> Even though PostgreSQL provides an efficient scrollable
> cursor, I would use it little unless it could survive
> across transactions.
>
> Anyway it's too bad that FETCH LAST means FETCH ALL.
I would remove LAST, RELATIVE and SCROLL keywords
for cursor related operations if there's no objection.
regards,
Hiroshi Inoue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: Inoue@tpf.co.jp, tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us, pgman@candle.pha.pa.us, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: MOVE LAST: why?
In-Reply-To: <EKEJJICOHDIEMGPNIFIJKEBGKFAA.Inoue@tpf.co.jp>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox