From: Philip Yarra <philip@utiba.com>
To: AgentM <agentm@cmu.edu>
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:10:03 +1000
Message-ID: <200306271210.03464.philip@utiba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D2560318-A842-11D7-860B-0030657192DA@cmu.edu>
References: <D2560318-A842-11D7-860B-0030657192DA@cmu.edu>
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:58 am, AgentM wrote:
> According to POSIX 1003.1c-1995, no such mutex-altering function exists.
Thanks for the info - useful to know.
> lock the mutex- potentially again). Either that or the recursive locks
> can be eliminated.
Avoiding recursive locks is my preference - the only two I have found ought to
be easy to avoid.
> Just for the record, OS X, Solaris 5.8, FreeBSD 4.8, and LinuxThreads
> support the UNIX98 version, so perhaps this isn't so important after
> all.
Add Tru64 (aka OSF1, aka DEC Unix) to that list. Just checked it.
Regards, Philip.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Reply to all the recipients using the --to and --cc options:
reply via email
To: pgsql-interfaces@postgresql.org
Cc: philip@utiba.com, agentm@cmu.edu, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: ECPG thread success (kind of) on Linux
In-Reply-To: <200306271210.03464.philip@utiba.com>
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
This inbox is served by DDX for PostgreSQL; see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox